Mike68 Posted June 6, 2019 Posted June 6, 2019 After the 2.5.5 update the trees has changed. The branches look much worse than in 2.5.4. I liked the trees very, very much in 2.5.4. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
lancerr Posted June 6, 2019 Posted June 6, 2019 To each their own but the trees look far more detailed and realistic in the second pic you posted. Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
dpj463 Posted June 6, 2019 Posted June 6, 2019 Me too! 2.5.5 trees look better to me. Gigabyte Z390 mobo, i9-9900K, 32gb ram, GTX 2080 ti, Evo 970 nvme 1tb, 2 DSD button box OSW panels, Oculus Rift CV1, Odyssey Plus, Valve Index, Rift S, HP Reverb, 2 SimRacingStudio wind sim fans, MFG Crosswind pedals, Warthog hotas w 50mm extension, Simlab GT1 EVOcockpit, Gametrix Jet Seat, SFX-100 3DOF motion, 8 transducers, 2 Cougar MFD's DCS World, Simshaker for Aviators, sound module Modules: P51, F/18, All Rotor craft, F14, F16, FC3 Super Carrier
BuzzU Posted June 6, 2019 Posted June 6, 2019 I agree. The new trees look distorted. Real trees don't grow like that. Buzz
Wali763 Posted June 6, 2019 Posted June 6, 2019 Also prefer 2.5.5 trees.... Did they put those trees also into Normandy? Or has this to be done by the map-developer? Normandy looks stunning, but those trees just shimmer and shimmer.........
Mike68 Posted June 6, 2019 Author Posted June 6, 2019 I'm using a 27 inch monitor, and the depth perception of the trees was much better in 2.5.4. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
ED Team NineLine Posted June 6, 2019 ED Team Posted June 6, 2019 We think the trees look better, as well they perform better. 1 Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug**
Mustang Posted June 6, 2019 Posted June 6, 2019 I see some strange dark patches in the forest (see in screenshot the trees towards the back) which disappear as you move close, anyone else seeing that?
BuzzU Posted June 6, 2019 Posted June 6, 2019 I'll give one example. Look at the tops of the trees. Trees don't grow that way. They grow straight like the old trees. There are many more examples. However, better performance is welcome. Buzz
rrohde Posted June 6, 2019 Posted June 6, 2019 We think the trees look better, as well they perform better. Is that all still based on SpeedTree tech, or something new and different? PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | MSI Suprim GeForce 3090 TI | ASUS Prime X570-P | 128GB DDR4 3600 RAM | 2TB Samsung 870 EVO SSD | Win10 Pro 64bit Gear: HP Reverb G2 | JetPad FSE | VKB Gunfighter Pro Mk.III w/ MCG Ultimate VKBcontrollers.com
Mad Dog 7.62 Posted June 6, 2019 Posted June 6, 2019 The old saying about not being able to see the forest for the trees is brought to mind here. This is a flight sim, not a forest sim. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Gigabyte GA97XSLI Core i7 4790 @ 4.0 Ghz MSI GTX 1080ti 32 Mb RAM DDR3-2133 512GB SSD for DCS HP Reverb VR HMD Thrustmaster Warthog & MFG Crosswind
sea2sky Posted June 6, 2019 Posted June 6, 2019 The trees in Caucasus have always been wrong no matter what. They are unrealistically tall/big especially for that region. Anybody who ever been there (incl my self) can tell that. Why it matters - it breaks immersion giving a wrong perception of altitude. i5-9600K@4.8GHz ★ 32Gb DDR4 ★ rtx5070ti ★ Quest Pro ★ Warthog on Virpil base
ED Team NineLine Posted June 6, 2019 ED Team Posted June 6, 2019 Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug**
grafspee Posted June 6, 2019 Posted June 6, 2019 Bob Ross System specs: I7 14700KF, Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Elite, 64GB DDR4 3600MHz, Gigabyte RTX 4090,Win 11, 48" OLED LG TV + 42" LG LED monitor
Coxy_99 Posted June 6, 2019 Posted June 6, 2019 BOB ROSS FTW, Trees are better i think less cartoon looking.
Harlikwin Posted June 6, 2019 Posted June 6, 2019 We think the trees look better, as well they perform better. Do they dance? Sing? :lol: New hotness: I7 9700k 4.8ghz, 32gb ddr4, 2080ti, :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, HP Reverb (formermly CV1) Old-N-busted: i7 4720HQ ~3.5GHZ, +32GB DDR3 + Nvidia GTX980m (4GB VRAM) :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, Rift CV1 (yes really).
wilbur81 Posted June 6, 2019 Posted June 6, 2019 Do they dance? Sing? :lol: I'm not seeing any performance increase with the new trees within Caucasas. I agree that the old trees looked better, too. i7 8700K @ Stock - Win11 64 - 64gb RAM - RTX 3080 12gb OC
Shimmergloom667 Posted June 6, 2019 Posted June 6, 2019 Them 2.5.5 trees really do look a lot better! i7 - 9700K | 32 GB DDR4 3200 | RTX 2080 | VKB Gunfighter Mk II /w MCG Pro | Virpil T-50CM2 Throttle | TrackIR 5 | VKB Mk. IV AJS-37 | A/V-8B | A-10C | F-14A/B | F-16C | F-18C | F-86F | FC3 | JF-17 | Ka-50 | L-39 | Mi-8 | MiG-15bis | MiG-19 | MiG-21bis | M2000-C | P-51D | Spitfire LF Mk. IX | UH-1H
Bobik2002 Posted June 6, 2019 Posted June 6, 2019 Ye i like new trees more than older. When you're highter it looks more real. Odesláno z mého Mi A1 pomocí Tapatalk Ryzen 9 5900x | 32GB DDR4 | RTX 3090 | 32GB RAM
flanker1 Posted June 6, 2019 Posted June 6, 2019 After the 2.5.5 update the trees has changed. The branches look much worse than in 2.5.4. I liked the trees very, very much in 2.5.4. oh my god, is this a joke?! please ED, april fool´s time is over. . . this is looking absolutely unrealistic. . . no wait, this is looking just stupid. please, please roll back or give us the chance to choice!
wilbur81 Posted June 6, 2019 Posted June 6, 2019 I'm sorry... I'm a HUGE Eagle Dynamics fan, but these new 2.5.5 trees look pretty awful (1st picture) when compared to 2.5.4 (2nd and 3rd pics) and I'm seeing zero performance gain on my end. Visually, this new update looks kind of disappointing in some areas. (I mentioned the degraded Hornet afterburner effect in 2.5.5 over in the Hornet thread.) [ATTACH]211356[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]211357[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]211358[/ATTACH] i7 8700K @ Stock - Win11 64 - 64gb RAM - RTX 3080 12gb OC
flanker1 Posted June 6, 2019 Posted June 6, 2019 I'm sorry... I'm a HUGE Eagle Dynamics fan, but these new 2.5.5 trees look pretty awful (1st picture) when compared to 2.5.4 (2nd and 3rd pics) and I'm seeing zero performance gain on my end. Visually, this new update looks kind of disappointing in some areas. (I mentioned the degraded Hornet afterburner effect in 2.5.5 over in the Hornet thread.) [ATTACH]211356[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]211357[/ATTACH] [ATTACH]211358[/ATTACH] jungle allover now. . . really hope this is not the end result. trees in 2.5.4 seems very right to me regarding this, seen in 2.5.5
Svsmokey Posted June 6, 2019 Posted June 6, 2019 oh my god, is this a joke?! please ED, april fool´s time is over. . . this is looking absolutely unrealistic. . . no wait, this is looking just stupid. please, please roll back or give us the chance to choice! You have the option to roll back any time you wish... 9700k @ stock , Aorus Pro Z390 wifi , 32gb 3200 mhz CL16 , 1tb EVO 970 , MSI RX 6800XT Gaming X TRIO , Seasonic Prime 850w Gold , Coolermaster H500m , Noctua NH-D15S , CH Pro throttle and T50CM2/WarBrD base on Foxxmounts , CH pedals , Reverb G2v2
Recommended Posts