LimePartician Posted January 16 Posted January 16 I am shocked. The appearance of this aircraft made my jaw drop. Hope we can get some hype going for this thing! 11
YoYo Posted January 16 Posted January 16 Now its a time for Su-57 ;>. 11 Webmaster of http://www.yoyosims.pl Win 10 64, i9-13900 KF, RTX 4090 24Gb OC, RAM 64Gb Corsair Vengeance LED OC@3600MHz,, 3xSSD+3xSSD M.2 NVMe, Predator XB271HU res.2560x1440 27'' G-sync, Sound Blaster Z + 5.1, TiR5, [MSFS, P3Dv5, DCS, RoF, Condor2, IL-2 CoD/BoX] VR fly only: Meta Quest Pro
AlexCaboose Posted January 16 Posted January 16 What state does ED intend to release the module in? Will it be as EA as the Viper, or closer towards more recent releases, such as the Apache? 476th vFG Website, 476th vFG Discord, 476th vFG Pipeline
Popular Post TheSkipjack95 Posted January 16 Popular Post Posted January 16 You cannot expect us to buy that "open source" documentation and looking over a dude's shoulder at a trade show constitutes enough to make a FF module of one of the newest frontline jets. This is absurd. Credibility shattering even. We moaned about the paper plane J8, but this...... 10 years of flying DCS and this is what it's becoming. Okay then. 84 8
Raven (Elysian Angel) Posted January 16 Posted January 16 I find this extremely puzzling as well 16 Spoiler Ryzen 9 5900X | 64GB G.Skill TridentZ 3600 | Asus ProArt RTX 4080 Super | ASUS ROG Strix X570-E GAMING | Samsung 990Pro 2TB + 960Pro 1TB NMVe | VR: Varjo Aero Pro Flight Trainer Puma | VIRPIL MT-50CM2 grip on VPForce Rhino with Z-curve extension | Virpil CM3 throttle | Virpil CP2 + 3 | FSSB R3L | VPC Rotor TCS Plus base with SharKa-50 grip | Everything mounted on Monstertech MFC-1 | TPR rudder pedals OpenXR | PD 1.0 | 100% render resolution | DCS graphics settings
Pingodingo Posted January 16 Posted January 16 imean its either this or you wanna wait 20 years more for it (im gladly taking this just as a good representation) 9
Sandman1330 Posted January 16 Posted January 16 I'm afraid I have to somewhat agree, though I'll do so with less cynicism. I do fear this may "cheapen the brand." There's no way this can be anything close to full fidelity. Released as an FC4, I'd understand. But I agree this could impact the credibility of ED's other, true FF modules that are based on actual tangible documentation. 22 Ryzen 7 5800X3D / Asus Crosshair VI Hero X370 / Corsair H110i / Sapphire Nitro+ 6800XT / 32Gb G.Skill TridentZ 3200 / Samsung 980 Pro M.2 / Virpil Warbrd base + VFX and TM grips / Virpil CM3 Throttle / Saitek Pro Combat pedals / Reverb G2
Phantom12 Posted January 16 Posted January 16 2 minutes ago, TheSkipjack95 said: You cannot expect us to buy that "open source" documentation and looking over a dude's shoulder at a trade show constitutes enough to make a FF module of one of the newest frontline jets. This is absurd. Credibility shattering even. We moaned about the paper plane J8, but this...... 10 years of flying DCS and this is what it's becoming. Okay then. This should tell you something about the standard of guesswork that has been used in other modules thus far..... 13 1
BarTzi Posted January 16 Posted January 16 3 minutes ago, TheSkipjack95 said: You cannot expect us to buy that "open source" documentation and looking over a dude's shoulder at a trade show constitutes enough to make a FF module of one of the newest frontline jets. This is absurd. Credibility shattering even. We moaned about the paper plane J8, but this...... 10 years of flying DCS and this is what it's becoming. Okay then. They simply changed what FF means. Now there's nothing ED can't do, so I hope they throw away their excuses for not making a super hornet. 7
Oban Posted January 16 Posted January 16 3 minutes ago, TheSkipjack95 said: You cannot expect us to buy that "open source" documentation and looking over a dude's shoulder at a trade show constitutes enough to make a FF module of one of the newest frontline jets. This is absurd. Credibility shattering even. We moaned about the paper plane J8, but this...... 10 years of flying DCS and this is what it's becoming. Okay then. Don't buy it then... others will. 15 AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX with Radeon Graphics 3.00 GHz 32 GB RAM 2 TB SSD RTX 4070 8GB Windows 11 64 bit
Bl00dWolf Posted January 16 Posted January 16 I guess it's better than nothing. As long as it doesn't turn into warthunder. And release in a year at least, in early access, still a long time to wait. Too bad there are essentially no red planes =( Hopefully there's a plans for 25-31 mig in future 5 i9 13900k 5.5Ghz; ASUS TUF RTX 3090 OC 24GB; 64GB ddr5 6400mhz cl30; 7 Tb SSD NVMe; 2Tb HDD; 40Tb NAS ZFS RAID1; LG 34GN850 3440x1440 160hz IPS; Hotas Warthog + VPC ACE Flight Rudder Pedals; TrackIR5; Quest3; DX7 Pro+ with HiFiMan Edition XS and Adam A7V MacBook PRO 16' 2023 M3 Max (14cpu-30gpu), DDR5 36Gb, 1Tb + 2Tb 990PRO Ext
lonewwolf Posted January 16 Posted January 16 (edited) I'm shocked, speechless... @Wags answered someone who asked for a possible FF F/A-18E/F Superhornet, he simply said "not possible not enough data"... and yet we'll get FF F-35A ? and possibly later, the B and C variants as well, an aircraft witch is still in active duty as the superhornet... so one could say "diimmed classified" ! Really, I would expect anything but a FF F-35A... Amazing ED, simply amazing! Edited January 16 by lonewwolf 12
bjdy Posted January 16 Posted January 16 (edited) It doen't say its FF or even flyable. Could be AI. Edit: My bad; didn''t see the faq Edited January 16 by bjdy 1
WinterH Posted January 16 Posted January 16 Tell your community "we are desperate" without spelling "we are desperate" 30 Wishlist: F-4E Block 53 +, MiG-27K, Su-17M3 or M4, AH-1F or W circa 80s or early 90s, J35 Draken, Kfir C7, Mirage III/V DCS-Dismounts Script
NytHawk Posted January 16 Posted January 16 4 minutes ago, TheSkipjack95 said: You cannot expect us to buy that "open source" documentation and looking over a dude's shoulder at a trade show constitutes enough to make a FF module of one of the newest frontline jets. Well there are several dozen hours online showing F35 simulators being used, i'd imagine much of the modelling for the F35 will be based off of them. The F35s development is by far the most publicized in history, and they also released quite a lot of real world demonstrations of sensor capabilities. You have to remember the JF17 was developed and released, with MUCH less real world documentation around it. Sure, ED will need to take some liberties making the F35... but i feel like it has the potential to be a great module regardless. 8 1
Raven (Elysian Angel) Posted January 16 Posted January 16 Just now, bjdy said: It doen't say its FF or even flyable. Could be AI. Did you read the FAQ? 6 minutes ago, Pingodingo said: imean its either this or you wanna wait 20 years more for it I’m not interested in it at all. I have no doubt it will appeal to a lot of people (it’s been proven there’s a large audience for the “latest and greatest shiny toy”) - primarily the younger audience I imagine. 7 1 Spoiler Ryzen 9 5900X | 64GB G.Skill TridentZ 3600 | Asus ProArt RTX 4080 Super | ASUS ROG Strix X570-E GAMING | Samsung 990Pro 2TB + 960Pro 1TB NMVe | VR: Varjo Aero Pro Flight Trainer Puma | VIRPIL MT-50CM2 grip on VPForce Rhino with Z-curve extension | Virpil CM3 throttle | Virpil CP2 + 3 | FSSB R3L | VPC Rotor TCS Plus base with SharKa-50 grip | Everything mounted on Monstertech MFC-1 | TPR rudder pedals OpenXR | PD 1.0 | 100% render resolution | DCS graphics settings
NytHawk Posted January 16 Posted January 16 (edited) 2 minutes ago, bjdy said: It doen't say its FF or even flyable. Could be AI. BN confirmed its FF in the ED discord. Edited January 16 by NytHawk 2
Cunctator Posted January 16 Posted January 16 If you don't like, then don't buy it. At the end money speaks. For me it's a very welcomed surprise. I am glad I can fly the F-35 in DCS as well simulated as currently possible before I am dead. 21
TheSkipjack95 Posted January 16 Posted January 16 Just now, bjdy said: It doen't say its FF or even flyable. Could be AI. Release next year. Low observable when EW is a joke in DCS (countermeasures are still RNG, jammers are a flag for other radars), dodgy af sources. I am lost for words. Standards just left the building. Make it FC if you must have an F35, but dont pretend we can have FF when that's your sales pitch. Liveries as a feature once again, jesus christ. 20 2
Cunctator Posted January 16 Posted January 16 Me too. Very happy indeed. Hope we will see the B eventually. 3
Hrundel Slushkov Posted January 16 Posted January 16 (edited) It was very...strange...decision... with f35 disappointed Edited January 16 by Hrundel Slushkov 19
PFT_Orph3us Posted January 16 Posted January 16 Gents, in my humble opinion, ED will do this no matter what. Let our wallets vote. 7
TheFreshPrince Posted January 16 Posted January 16 I was wondering about the Eurofighter already and even for the F18 we still have a lot of unknowns. But every country with older jets is transitioning to F35s right now. Yes we are getting older models I know, but there is no way we are getting anything close to the real jet. It's capabilities will need to be nerfed by 20-30% minimum. 1 1
Bl00dWolf Posted January 16 Posted January 16 LMAO 9 i9 13900k 5.5Ghz; ASUS TUF RTX 3090 OC 24GB; 64GB ddr5 6400mhz cl30; 7 Tb SSD NVMe; 2Tb HDD; 40Tb NAS ZFS RAID1; LG 34GN850 3440x1440 160hz IPS; Hotas Warthog + VPC ACE Flight Rudder Pedals; TrackIR5; Quest3; DX7 Pro+ with HiFiMan Edition XS and Adam A7V MacBook PRO 16' 2023 M3 Max (14cpu-30gpu), DDR5 36Gb, 1Tb + 2Tb 990PRO Ext
Recommended Posts