Jump to content

F-35A Announcement discussion mega thread.


Go to solution Solved by NineLine,

Recommended Posts

Posted

good-choice-tony-tang.gif

Now its a time for Su-57 ;>.

  • Like 11

Webmaster of http://www.yoyosims.pl

Yoyosimsbanner.gif

Win 10 64, i9-13900 KF, RTX  4090 24Gb OC, RAM 64Gb Corsair Vengeance LED OC@3600MHz,, 3xSSD+3xSSD M.2 NVMe, Predator XB271HU res.2560x1440 27'' G-sync, Sound Blaster Z + 5.1, TiR5, [MSFS, P3Dv5, DCS, RoF, Condor2, IL-2 CoD/BoX] VR fly only: Meta Quest Pro

Posted

I find this extremely puzzling as well 🤔

  • Like 16
Spoiler

Ryzen 9 5900X | 64GB G.Skill TridentZ 3600 | Asus ProArt RTX 4080 Super | ASUS ROG Strix X570-E GAMING | Samsung 990Pro 2TB + 960Pro 1TB NMVe | VR: Varjo Aero
Pro Flight Trainer Puma | VIRPIL MT-50CM2 grip on VPForce Rhino with Z-curve extension | Virpil CM3 throttle | Virpil CP2 + 3 | FSSB R3L | VPC Rotor TCS Plus base with SharKa-50 grip | Everything mounted on Monstertech MFC-1 | TPR rudder pedals

OpenXR | PD 1.0 | 100% render resolution | DCS graphics settings

 

Posted

I'm afraid I have to somewhat agree, though I'll do so with less cynicism.

I do fear this may "cheapen the brand." There's no way this can be anything close to full fidelity. Released as an FC4, I'd understand. But I agree this could impact the credibility of ED's other, true FF modules that are based on actual tangible documentation.

  • Like 22

Ryzen 7 5800X3D / Asus Crosshair VI Hero X370 / Corsair H110i / Sapphire Nitro+ 6800XT / 32Gb G.Skill TridentZ 3200 / Samsung 980 Pro M.2 / Virpil Warbrd base + VFX and TM grips / Virpil CM3 Throttle / Saitek Pro Combat pedals / Reverb G2

Posted
2 minutes ago, TheSkipjack95 said:

You cannot expect us to buy that "open source" documentation and looking over a dude's shoulder at a trade show constitutes enough to make a FF module of one of the newest frontline jets.

This is absurd. Credibility shattering even.

We moaned about the paper plane J8, but this......

10 years of flying DCS and this is what it's becoming. Okay then.

This should tell you something about the standard of guesswork that has been used in other modules thus far.....

  • Like 13
  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, TheSkipjack95 said:

You cannot expect us to buy that "open source" documentation and looking over a dude's shoulder at a trade show constitutes enough to make a FF module of one of the newest frontline jets.

This is absurd. Credibility shattering even.

We moaned about the paper plane J8, but this......

10 years of flying DCS and this is what it's becoming. Okay then.

They simply changed what FF means. Now there's nothing ED can't do, so I hope they throw away their excuses for not making a super hornet.

  • Like 7
Posted
3 minutes ago, TheSkipjack95 said:

You cannot expect us to buy that "open source" documentation and looking over a dude's shoulder at a trade show constitutes enough to make a FF module of one of the newest frontline jets.

This is absurd. Credibility shattering even.

We moaned about the paper plane J8, but this......

10 years of flying DCS and this is what it's becoming. Okay then.

Don't buy it then... others will.

  • Like 15

AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX with Radeon Graphics           3.00 GHz

32 GB RAM

2 TB SSD

RTX 4070 8GB

Windows 11 64 bit

Posted

I guess it's better than nothing.
As long as it doesn't turn into warthunder.

And release in a year at least, in early access, still a long time to wait.

Too bad there are essentially no red planes =( Hopefully there's a plans for 25-31 mig in future

  • Like 5

i9 13900k 5.5Ghz; ASUS TUF RTX 3090 OC 24GB; 64GB ddr5 6400mhz cl30; 7 Tb SSD NVMe; 2Tb HDD; 40Tb NAS ZFS RAID1; LG 34GN850 3440x1440 160hz IPS; Hotas Warthog + VPC ACE Flight Rudder Pedals; TrackIR5; Quest3; DX7 Pro+ with HiFiMan Edition XS and Adam A7V

MacBook PRO 16' 2023 M3 Max (14cpu-30gpu), DDR5 36Gb, 1Tb + 2Tb 990PRO Ext


 

 


 
Posted (edited)

I'm shocked, speechless... @Wags answered someone who asked for a possible FF F/A-18E/F Superhornet, he simply said "not possible not enough data"... and yet we'll get FF F-35A ? and possibly later, the B and C variants as well, an aircraft witch is still in active duty as the superhornet... so one could say "diimmed classified" !

Really, I would expect anything but a FF F-35A... Amazing ED, simply amazing!

Edited by lonewwolf
  • Like 12
Posted (edited)

It doen't say its FF or even flyable. Could be AI.

 

Edit: My bad; didn''t see the faq

Edited by bjdy
  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, TheSkipjack95 said:

You cannot expect us to buy that "open source" documentation and looking over a dude's shoulder at a trade show constitutes enough to make a FF module of one of the newest frontline jets.

Well there are several dozen hours online showing F35 simulators being used, i'd imagine much of the modelling for the F35 will be based off of them. The F35s development is by far the most publicized in history, and they also released quite a lot of real world demonstrations of sensor capabilities. 
You have to remember the JF17 was developed and released, with MUCH less real world documentation around it.

Sure, ED will need to take some liberties making the F35... but i feel like it has the potential to be a great module regardless.

  • Like 8
  • Thanks 1
Posted
Just now, bjdy said:

It doen't say its FF or even flyable. Could be AI.

Did you read the FAQ?

 

6 minutes ago, Pingodingo said:

imean its either this or you wanna wait 20 years more for it

I’m not interested in it at all. I have no doubt it will appeal to a lot of people (it’s been proven there’s a large audience for the “latest and greatest shiny toy”) - primarily the younger audience I imagine.

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 1
Spoiler

Ryzen 9 5900X | 64GB G.Skill TridentZ 3600 | Asus ProArt RTX 4080 Super | ASUS ROG Strix X570-E GAMING | Samsung 990Pro 2TB + 960Pro 1TB NMVe | VR: Varjo Aero
Pro Flight Trainer Puma | VIRPIL MT-50CM2 grip on VPForce Rhino with Z-curve extension | Virpil CM3 throttle | Virpil CP2 + 3 | FSSB R3L | VPC Rotor TCS Plus base with SharKa-50 grip | Everything mounted on Monstertech MFC-1 | TPR rudder pedals

OpenXR | PD 1.0 | 100% render resolution | DCS graphics settings

 

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, bjdy said:

It doen't say its FF or even flyable. Could be AI.

BN confirmed its FF in the ED discord.

image.png

Edited by NytHawk
  • Like 2
Posted

If you don't like, then don't buy it. At the end money speaks. For me it's a very welcomed surprise. I am glad I can fly the F-35 in DCS as well simulated as currently possible before I am dead.

  • Like 21
Posted
Just now, bjdy said:

It doen't say its FF or even flyable. Could be AI.

9v8dwkh3cfde1.png?ex=678acd50&is=67897bd

Release next year. Low observable when EW is a joke in DCS (countermeasures are still RNG, jammers are a flag for other radars), dodgy af sources.

I am lost for words. Standards just left the building.

Make it FC if you must have an F35, but dont pretend we can have FF when that's your sales pitch. Liveries as a feature once again, jesus christ. 

  • Like 20
  • Thanks 2
Posted

I was wondering about the Eurofighter already and even for the F18 we still have a lot of unknowns. But every country with older jets is transitioning to F35s right now. Yes we are getting older models I know, but there is no way we are getting anything close to the real jet. It's capabilities will need to be nerfed by 20-30% minimum.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

LMAO

GH41pEZ.png

  • Like 9

i9 13900k 5.5Ghz; ASUS TUF RTX 3090 OC 24GB; 64GB ddr5 6400mhz cl30; 7 Tb SSD NVMe; 2Tb HDD; 40Tb NAS ZFS RAID1; LG 34GN850 3440x1440 160hz IPS; Hotas Warthog + VPC ACE Flight Rudder Pedals; TrackIR5; Quest3; DX7 Pro+ with HiFiMan Edition XS and Adam A7V

MacBook PRO 16' 2023 M3 Max (14cpu-30gpu), DDR5 36Gb, 1Tb + 2Tb 990PRO Ext


 

 


 
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...