vCUJOv Posted March 28, 2010 Posted March 28, 2010 I say it'll be the F-86 Sabre. How about Cessna 172 Skyhawk
My Fing ID Posted March 28, 2010 Posted March 28, 2010 Predator drone. Push a button, grab some coffee.
159th_Falcon Posted March 28, 2010 Posted March 28, 2010 Tornado would be very cool. or maybe a Saab? Mirage maybe? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] The keeper of all mathematical knowledge and the oracle of flight modeling.:)
hannibal Posted March 28, 2010 Posted March 28, 2010 Apache AH-64D pilot & copilot gunner madness! (next best thing to jane's longbow for the 21st century) find me on steam! username: Hannibal_A101A http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561197969447179
Cyb0rg Posted March 28, 2010 Posted March 28, 2010 I think an F-16 would be ideal because for one thing it has similar setup to the A-10C, all the avionics are available on the net along with manuals etc. It would be a very quick and simple aircraft to model and its popularity means you'll sell alot of copys considering F4AF did so well. In MP it would rock as well you can use the A-10C for FAC and the F-16s for BAI.:thumbup: Ideally you would also need IFF and in game Voice coms to really get the most out of the sim and both HAVQUICK and AIFF are in the MLU Manuals.:joystick: Indeed, the 16 seems logical. They could also do the su-25T, a lot is done already. Still not as worldwide popular as the 16, not even close. :pilotfly: [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Asteroids ____________________________________________ Update this :D
sweinhart3 Posted March 28, 2010 Posted March 28, 2010 So are we looking at about 9 more months for A-10C? Was the project halted in favor of FC2 until its release or was it being worked on concurrently? Intel i7 990X, 6GB DDR3, Nvidia GTX 470 x2 SLI, Win 7 x64 http://picasaweb.google.com/sweinhart
McDaniel Posted March 28, 2010 Posted March 28, 2010 .....smartassmode on.....;) I will be something they can sell to a military constitution, so it will be a modul, that is still in service in RL, like......??? who cares, guy's, come on, enjoy FC2 and BS! :smartass: BTW I cant wait for the DCS A-10C....:pilotfly: McDan out ohhh yeah, the Apache would not make me cry.... |AMD 7800x3D | 64GB DDR5-3600| GTX 4090 | Virpil Stick, Collectiv, WW MIP, WW Throttle, MFG Crosswind V2 | Windows 11 64-bit | SSD Samsung | 4K LG Oled 48 | Oculus Q3 | Simlab based Cockpit
ED Team f-18hornet Posted March 28, 2010 ED Team Posted March 28, 2010 F16 Falcon any variant. PLEASE Yes please an F-16.:joystick: AMD Ryzen 9 3900X, GeForce RTX 2080Ti, 32 GB DRAM, HOTAS TM Warthog, FSSB R3 Lighting, MFG Crosswind, Win 10 Pro
Heli Shed Posted March 28, 2010 Posted March 28, 2010 F1-11 !! Got ya thinkin' huh? Come pay us a visit on YouTube - search for HELI SHED
pelmo76 Posted March 28, 2010 Posted March 28, 2010 Eurofighter Typhoon! Blackbird: "LA Center, requested flight level Angels 80." (80,000 feet) Center: "If you think you can get there, buddy, go ahead!" Blackbird: "Roger; Descending to Angels 80."
MTFDarkEagle Posted March 28, 2010 Posted March 28, 2010 Su-37. look at this: I would love to be able to do that :weight_lift_2::notworthy::thumbsup: Lukas - "TIN TIN" - 9th Shrek Air Strike Squadron TIN TIN's Cockpit thread
Pilotasso Posted March 28, 2010 Posted March 28, 2010 Su-37 was scraped long ago. The latest and greatest will be Su-35 which is already much better than the 37 considering its been 15+ years. .
brydling Posted March 28, 2010 Posted March 28, 2010 (edited) or maybe a Saab? That will never happen. Sweden sucks when it comes to information about old military aircraft. The Draken is not in use in any country of the world anymore, yet it is still very classified. It is simply too expensive to go through the administrative process of declassifing everything for no reason. Same goes for the Viggen, however that is more understandable since it is newer. We are building one Draken simulator and one Viggen simulator out of real sawed-off cockpits obtained when they were going to the junkyard, and even we are having a hard time finding information when we want to model the systems in our simulators. Of course it gets a little bit easier when you have a network of contacts both inside Saab and inside the Air Force. However, I would die in happiness if we got a DCS: J35J Draken. Edited March 28, 2010 by brydling Digital-to-Synchro converter for interfacing real aircraft instruments - Thread Check out my High Input Count Joystick Controller for cockpit builders, with support for 248 switches, 2 POV hats and 13 analog axes. Over 60 units sold. - B256A13 www.novelair.com - The world's most realistic flight simulators of the J35J Draken and the AJS37 Viggen.
brydling Posted March 28, 2010 Posted March 28, 2010 (edited) nobody wants f-18? :huh: My all-time favourite, so of course I want it ;) My first simulator ever was F/A-18 Korea for Mac :) However an F-16 would be just as cool for home-cockpit building. Edited March 28, 2010 by brydling Digital-to-Synchro converter for interfacing real aircraft instruments - Thread Check out my High Input Count Joystick Controller for cockpit builders, with support for 248 switches, 2 POV hats and 13 analog axes. Over 60 units sold. - B256A13 www.novelair.com - The world's most realistic flight simulators of the J35J Draken and the AJS37 Viggen.
Boberro Posted March 28, 2010 Posted March 28, 2010 F-16 or F-18 would be nice ^^^^ Reminder: Fighter pilots make movies. Bomber pilots make... HISTORY! :D | Also to be remembered: FRENCH TANKS HAVE ONE GEAR FORWARD AND FIVE BACKWARD :D ಠ_ಠ ツ
159th_Viper Posted March 28, 2010 Posted March 28, 2010 DCS: Sopwith-Camel :thumbup: 2 Novice or Veteran looking for an alternative MP career? Click me to commence your Journey of Pillage and Plunder! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] '....And when I get to Heaven, to St Peter I will tell.... One more Soldier reporting Sir, I've served my time in Hell......'
sobek Posted March 28, 2010 Posted March 28, 2010 An-2 FTW. Why not outfit the wright flyer with a GAU-8 and call it DCS: Mission to Mars? You people :doh::) Good, fast, cheap. Choose any two. Come let's eat grandpa! Use punctuation, save lives!
MTFDarkEagle Posted March 28, 2010 Posted March 28, 2010 Given the choise, If it would be a fixed wing a F-16, rotator a Mi-24 or an Apache Longbow. However, I would love ANYTHING in DCS fidility. Whatever is on offer, I'll buy asap. Lukas - "TIN TIN" - 9th Shrek Air Strike Squadron TIN TIN's Cockpit thread
Krippz Posted March 28, 2010 Posted March 28, 2010 DCS: F-15 vs Su-27....enough said! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] 64th "Scorpions" Aggressor Squadron Discord: 64th Aggressor Squadron TS: 195.201.110.22
ARM505 Posted March 28, 2010 Posted March 28, 2010 You may as well start by eliminating stuff. Here's what it WON'T be (my guess, feel free to add/argue/rant). It WON'T be: - AH64D - Any older Euro/Brit aircraft (Jaguar, Tornado, SAAB's etc) - Any older US aircraft (F4, Starfighter, Thud etc) - Eurofighter (Typhoon in Britain, forgotten what they called it elsewhere) - F22 - F35 - Any carrier based aircraft, so no F14's/18's/Rafale etc (my best guess, the effort involved for this round of DCS to get carrier ops up and running to a decent (DCS) standard is not worth the investment yet.) I also can't see it being an F16 or Mi24 somehow, but that's just gut feel, nothing more. You can cry and moan about some of those choices, but that's my GUESS based on the support, info available, and effort involved. As I said, feel free to eliminate further options, you just may end up with a very small list of what they can ultimately do. But I must say, endless requests for flat out impossible projects (AH64D, F22, F35, weird future Ruski planes) is simply doomed to be a waste of space, IMHO.
*Rage* Posted March 28, 2010 Posted March 28, 2010 My best guess....F16 or F18 Id rather the F18 over the F16 but to be honest im not really inspired by either. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] 64th "Scorpions" Aggressor Squadron Discord: 64th Aggressor Squadron TS: 195.201.110.22
sobek Posted March 28, 2010 Posted March 28, 2010 As I said, feel free to eliminate further options, you just may end up with a very small list of what they can ultimately do. But I must say, endless requests for flat out impossible projects (AH64D, F22, F35, weird future Ruski planes) is simply doomed to be a waste of space, IMHO. Jolly good, sir, that's why i opt for little nellie [1] [1] 1 Good, fast, cheap. Choose any two. Come let's eat grandpa! Use punctuation, save lives!
claud Posted March 28, 2010 Posted March 28, 2010 anything but a slow mover.. f-15/16/18/14 u name it.. just not anoter A-G only. multirole is the key. ofc about 3 million poles all showed the F-16 ..so... lol.
Booger Posted March 28, 2010 Posted March 28, 2010 (edited) I'm with the choice that any aircraft would make me happy. But.. Being realistic. It only makes sense that the DCS compatibility with FC2 suggests that fighters aren't really the priority of ED...at least not yet. The best, more logical choice for the next DCS airframe is the BAE Harrier II. Even though the aircraft is mostly carrier based, it can easily be introduced as land based. Still, it would be an excellent opportunity to introduce minor carrier ops. Actually, now that I think about it, the X52 would work excellent for the Harrier. The throttle would obviously still be used for the aircraft's throttle, but the precision slider would work perfectly as the vent handle. Edited March 28, 2010 by Booger 1
Recommended Posts