All Activity

In that case feel free to upload a short track so we can see exactly what's going on.

Minor quibble: The date in mission is 2011 not 2008 per campaign. The title is also not aligned with the naming style of the other missions. Also, when running down the Senaki bound Fencers, they are abrubtly declared dead when in fact egressing over Zugdidi. I don't think this is mission critical but it does detract from immersion. Just saying because I have flown this campaign to death as it were and still dig it!!!

Can you share a short track or video of your engine start procedure - this will greatly help in diagnosing why you are having an issue(s). Thanks.

I'm running beta as well and the latest version Posted this same issue on the SS discord. Have yet to hear back

Помню что лагерь вирпилов тогда делился приблизительно поровну 50% воздушных стрелков "нагибателей" - 50% "землекопов". Сейчас волшебным образом "заявка" на 90% работающих по наземке... "мир изменился". Если уже спокойно можно возить грузы то возить десант например это уже на 99% паксовоз.

Default position is at zero. What you're seeing is with my foot on the pedal at the point of instant jump to 50. I've eliminated that useless part with a 50 deadzone. If I leave it as a straight slider then 50 input would be an instant 50 output on the brakes which is very undesirable. This works very well. ..

Это всё влажные мечты. Пусть этот хотя бы появится и будет доведён "до финала" ещё при нашей (моей точно) жизни.

Here you go... KneeboardFiles.zip

I noticed one thing: the sun visor inside the cabin is transparent. The view from the outside is correct. Can anyone tell me which file is responsible for this element inside the cabin? I wanted to see if it's possible to achieve the same effect as in, for example, the OH-58 Kiowa. OH-58 sun visor off/on

Это ЭТО естественно. У Вас слишком богатое воображение.

German Airforce hopefully. And I hope a livery magician will do a 1980s GAF Transall look-alike eventually

this is assuming, so take it with a grain of salt. I "assume" every module has a contractual agreement behind it rather than just the 3rd party (and Ill touch on that briefly), and if thats the case then yeah...every module contracted prior to VEAOs departure would be left out of the updated agreement, and those signed afterwards are enforced. If its the 3rd party that signed the contract and its for as long as they develop under the ED SDK, then every contract afterwards would be enforced. ED never made this clear...personally I think they should, but it kind of doesnt really matter at this point.

Первый транспортники в ДКС это ХьюИ с Ми-8. Потом Чинук. Но с так называемым fixed-wing aircraft да еще и многомоторный - да! Геркулес первый Но нет русской локализации. Поэтому не тороплюсь с покупкой.

Das Teil hat das Potential eine große Tür in DCS auf zu treten. Für Helikopter haben wir ja bereits Transport. Genau genommen schon sehr lange wenn man an die Huey denkt. Als Starrflügler allerdings ist das nochmal eine andere Nummer. Mehr Last, mehr Reichweite, mehr Geschwindigkeit. Und relativ nahe an dem Gameplay, dass zivile Simulationen bieten. Wenn das Teil erfolgreich wird ist es ein Signal, dass man in DCS Flugzeuge verkaufen kann die nicht auf Kampf ausgelegt sind, b.z.w. deren "Gameplay" hauptsächlich aus sehr nerdigem, wenig actionlastigem Kram besteht. Bomber, Tanker, AWACS....da wird einiges denkbar.

Yes it's true

Got it. Thanks. Now Windows Firewall blocks the download due to potential virus. Need to work on that.

After all this mess, almost 2 years of waiting for a resolution, we as customers, already dont know since 2018 what modules are inside de ED sharing files policy, speaks volumes about the importance of customers concernings for DCS and 3rd Parties, ED has. Something so easy to listed that will give customers some kind of relief and confidence are still unknown. This situation makes me believe not only Razbam is out of this policy, but more 3rd parties are not signing it, involving more modules. If thats not the case i dont know why we are still beeing ignored.

There was a huge amount of backlash from the community after the first iteration of the Afghanistan map, and ED noticed they can't get away with releasing such low-quality modules/maps any more. That's most likely the reason behind all the delays: to incorporate consumer feedback and generally speaking improving the overall quality. Most people would agree delays are preferable over early releases of sub-par modules/maps, I bet...

off topic removed. Please keep the discussion about the C-130J Thank you

Hi, zerO_crash wrote "that it's coming this year." Which, in DCS terms, means "be patient."

This is a known crash which has been reported to dev team here: Your log also says that you have core parking enabled which can lead to stuttters/microfreezes, or even crashes in certain situations. Here is a link with information and a tutorial to disable this setting in Windows 11. https://www.dannymoran.com/windows-cpu-core-parking/

Эх! вот бы "красный" какой нить. Ан-24/12

I hope this will be for the Huey and other helicopters too. Happy landings, Talisman

It was an air start nam dogfight-20250802-113941.trk It requires the ww2 marianas map