All Activity

Pimax Play is the software client that powers all the Pimax VR headsets, including the 5K/8K, Crystal Series, Crystal Super, Dream Air, and Dream Air SE. Already we've made huge progress in the last few years, adding features such as GPU upscaling, sharpening, more runtimes and tons of configuration options, such as adjustable Quad Views. We want to show you what's to come in the next coming months and the next year. Our team has been working hard behind the scenes to deliver a smoother, smarter, and more reliable experience — and we want to give you a sneak peek of what’s on the horizon. Here’s what you can expect later from us: A More Stunning Visual Experience Designed to make immersion deeper and navigation smoother: Pimax Play UI 2.0 Revised Device Settings – A clearer, more streamlined settings interface Revised System UI – Cleaner, more efficient navigation New Pimax Home – A redesigned, immersive home environment A More Intuitive Interaction Experience Making control more natural and effortless: Native Hand Tracking – Direct hand control without the need for controllers. (Note: Only SLAM-tracked headsets can use this.) Read more at: https://pimax.com/blogs/blogs/pimax-play-roadmap

Someone remember the "walk" feature claimed on the Supercarrier early?

I know exactly what they are, flight directors, it's how they are labeled in the FC manual (where the screenshot comes from) but they currently do not work in the Fulcrum. So I'm asking, WIP or not a feature of the real aircraft.

As mentioned in other threads we are doing some work on the rotor for a future patch. This yaw tweak is an interim tweak while we wait for the main work to be completed. She is certainly handling better now. thanks

Thank you for your response. Unfortunately for myself is only working if I not comment out the line but change it boolean state - false. Sharing my file BriefingDialog.lua

Likewise. I'm also 'Sparticus'...

It's Attitude director indicator, because it combines the attitude indicator with a flight director. What you labelled 'required heading' and 'required altitude' are actually the ILS loc and gs indicators and they have nothing to do with heading or altitude. Your 'required bank ' needle is actually the required heading needle and your 'required pitch' needle is actually the required altitude needle. Looks a lot more like operator error to me than a 'cheat' addition.

Я полагаю, тут надо сперва понять, если ли у @Fighter29 этот модуль. Всё же не совсем дешёвое удовольствие.

Agree completely. Online, the FC 29 is far more competitive and has higher survivability than the FF 29. With the F5E, the difference was negligible as it is a very simple aircraft. With the 29, the difference is significant. Nevertheless, today many folks were driving the Fulcrum on Contention SARH. Hopefully, more will join in.

Also wenn ich den Post How to use ground weapons öffne finde ich dort das Video: null

It was an interesting trade off, strike capability vs survivability. The fact that US carriers post the Essex class used armoured decks probably says it all.

@Massun92 Hola! Any update on this project?

Happy to say- Ben_Der blessed us again with a new screenie in dev shouts!! (drooling)

+1

Здравствуйте! Огромное спасибо за долгожданный модуль ) Из визуализации нашел не работающий светофильтр ИЛС и зеркала на внешних видах, а также неправильно подвешенная стремянка.

The mapped AB Latches and Idle Latches on my hotas do not work for me, nor do the keyboard commands. Right-click on the stopwatch does also nothing. I cant cold start for this reason or use the afterburner without auto-latch. Anyone sees the same or has an idea whats going on with my setup? Dont have mapping issues with other modules...

The "problem" is the old MiG29A is still there and it rocks compared to new one in its simplicity and FC3 "cheats". And its there even on te popular servers.

Personally, I think it's a great idea. If I were doing a cold start or hot from ramp I'd rather walk up to the aircraft than just appear in the cockpit (I might assume someone else had already checked the airworthiness though). We have amazing airbases / terrain getting dropped near / walking to the aircraft has to be more immersive. (I imagine it would go down pretty well on the carrier ops) OK - feedback - I do. Maybe a poll would be a good idea (headed with a slightly longer video?).

Not using GCI is a tremendous misconception in Western civilian general audience. US never had absence of GCI or AWACS in real combat. Absense of HQ outside of cockpits is not "adding flexibility", its removing tactical and operational analisis. Also what is really put into "flexibility"? It's military, not school yard. You have objective you go get it. or "Dudes I don't feel protecting 3 mechanized batallions refueling and rearming for the next 45 minutes, I see a helicopter, monke neuron activates". And then a single MiG-27 obliterates your infantry batallion with a tactical nuke. Same as when you request permission to do something it's not "dumb rigidity" it's because to do new thing you need to abandon old thing, and it should be verified if it's ok to have it unattended. Hope it explains.

This looks good as far as AA goes, but is not a real solution. FSR still produces too much ghosting for me to be acceptable for WVR spotting. Planes just look like a blur.

+1

image.png From HB Discord. AI Intruder liveries.

Make sure, that if you have to invert axis, you do it in the MOza driver, not in the sim. That's important for all FFB-devices.

This is needed for more immersion. Especially in VR if the scale is right. Bring it on ED.