All Activity

I am guessing not. Remember: It is known that time and time again, Pimax lies about their FOV numbers. OG Crystal supposedly had 115HFOV (when it reality it has more like 105) they originally advertised the Super 50ppd as having 135HFOV when in truth it's closer to 125, so I would assume that the Ultrawide will have barely a few degrees more for an optical engine that will take even longer to be delivered and with compromised binocular overlap. Again this is just a guess but I think it's better to wait for user reviews - NOT affiliate reviews. Honest user reviews take much longer to show up but are a better representation than the dozens of usual first YouTubers that Pimax compensates.

Есть пара выходов на 75/75, результаты под спойлером: Не без косяков конечно: после брейка перед траверзом проваливаюсь до 560 и 540 футов, но до контрольной точки успеваю поднабрать до нужного предела. Как я и говорил - это не достаток метода контроля параметров. Но на итоге это не сказалось, высший бал получен, в общем не эталон конечно, но пока так. Ну будем считать эту миссию я прошёл, подавайте мне теперь нечто подобное для кейс 3. Будем его разучивать.

Я недавно купил себе (первое что нашел в местном магазине) вот такой адаптер - Digitus USB Type-C™ Gigabit Ethernet adapter with Power Delivery support. Через него шлем коннектится с роутером даже без внешнего питания. Не греется (слегка теплый). Если подключаю к адаптеру внешнее питание - штатную зарядку от Quest 3 или питание от BOBOVR S3 Pro 10000mAh Battery Head Strap - то шлем вообще не разряжается, наоборот - постепенно заряжается если был не 100%.

In this image, where Manogay is (coordinates are on the bottom left on the screenshot), the town of Nangalam is right there to the Southeast, Manogay was just a small village where it's at on the map (that was overtaken by FOB Blessing), but the part across the Pech was Nangalam, not a continuation of Manogay. Other than that keep up the work..

That is correct regarding alternate base. I'm aware of their forum but looking at several original posts with no responses, I figured I would have a better chance here. Thanks.

MiG-23MLA Razbam chosen is the best, the lightest airframe with the strongest engine and reinforced wing root. It was still a dangerous fighter in late 1970s. Wneh MLD was outdated when it entered production as MiG-29 was already in production as well, alongside this last -23MLD variant.

Ой, соррян, конечно реверс внешних ))

As for proportions, it is visible here. The canopy seems too big for the rest and it is not perspective because it is visible in other screenshots. One of the worst editions of Su-22 paper models is the "Mały Modelarz" model from 1990 and 2003. It had very bad proportions in this place. Of course, your model is not as bad, but somehow it reminded me of that - http://www.kartonowki.pl/modele-galeria/model/3559,su-22-fitter-mm-2003. Very well, it was done in the Sniper's model (below) and there the proportions are correct. Sometimes the scan and transfer to 3D by machine can cause some disproportions, which are worth assessing by eye anyway. Real one: I think it's worth improving it because these aspects are quite visible, although I'm also a purist, so maybe not everyone will be bothered by it ;).

Hey @ayousry Just flew mission. No problems, hit both targets. Must be something you are doing your end. I could send you my track if you want. This tested on latest Open Beta.

+65,4 I love this idea. Pls gib ED.

Thank you. I understand this. What I want to say is how to implement this function with a script. Each time the player pulls the switch, a message is displayed.

Zabuzard, Thank you so much for your input. You were spot on with your diagnosis, as I had indeed mapped the Jester Console in error. My F4 is back in operation! Again most grateful to you for taking the time to reply.

Every VR set works out of the box but not necessarily as you expect. VR is still a bit of a challenge but there are plenty of people here ready to help. My first bit of advice is don't panic. Take your time and you will get there. My second bit of advice is that age gives experience. If you don't have the knowledge exploit the ability of others!

When i attempted to look into the future by looking at my Walt Disney World crystal ball, it broke. I had to send in for repairs. And now we must wait without knowing. So much for Disney magic.

Before release, please improve the front landing gear model. It sits way too low here. The Su-22M4 on the ground has a rather characteristic silhouette, and the model unfortunately differs from the one we have in reality in this respect. Even under a heavy load, it should not sit as low as on the screenies. Btw. There is also a certain disturbance in the geometry of the canopy. How to call it - there is a bit too much glass and too little fuselage in this place. It is not a big problem and currently I can only base myself on these screenshots, but the fairing itself is too big in this place. At least that's how it looks. It would be nice to do it if possible.

Because no one wants a finished product or this:

My guess would be „no“, but I can‘t tell for sure. I guess you want to run that combination on some sort of non-Realsimulator Base? RS has their own little forum on their website, which might be a better place to ask.

И какая же основная тема обсуждения тут?

@ejbhimself It's just a text batch file. Open it with notepad and type in any version number you need instead of that old one. You can quickly check all recent version numbers in update thread:

My issue was that with CFM if I tried to create a mission with WW2 allied aircraft all it would generate was a massive flight of 190 D9s either in a fighter role or carrying bombs. The "bombers" would just fly in a straight line and wait to be shot down. Nice once, OK a second time, fcuking shiite 3rd time onwards!!!

for the ed-members: i wanted to rollback to the last update, but the command-box way doesn't work. i found this one here where an ed-staff member provided an easy rollback file, which i tried and worked for me, but of course, the version is not the last one, but way too old. if you could simply provide one for the last update, which would, in that case, be the last one for me to use every time until the problems get fixed - if ever -, this would be nice. thanks in advance. ---->

Here is a short track where the pitot tube ices up after take off. I take off go up to 16K'ish level off and cruise clear of clouds and then climb and dive with the info bar open. The airspeed increases in climb and decreases in a dive like an altimeter, seemingly pitot icing with open static ports. Pitot Ice After TakeOff.trk dcs.log

I agree, I mean I flew over where I served, and think that Nangalam (just southeast of Manogay) should be there instead because Manogay was like a small village compared to the more abundant Nangalam. Anyway, the map is beautiful so far, and I need to make a mission where I play around and plink targets and such, and enjoy the scenery. I mean with the A-10 and other stuff that was used there it's a real demanding place for doing stuff, and agree, the attention to detail with the villages is nice. Too bad there's no sandbox with infantry (like a first person shooter perspective) on the scale of other sandbox games. But it's great for flying and think that while it's got it's issues, it's still a good buy.