All Activity

Would have to be an ASC C-2 Greyhound module for that bit

It's a shame to waste your life on toxic, demanding people. This kind of behavior leaves many great projects in the hands of their creators. @tobiThank you for all the work you've done so far for us helicopter enthusiasts. I wish you joy and peace in your life.

Хех, мне даже стало любопытно. Если взять карту Сирии от Аммана до Алеппо 480 км по прямой. На M1.8 лететь 15 минут. Так что да, можно туда-сюда слетать. В теории [/шутка] Хотя даже на карте Афгана а тем более Ирака, когда они сделают расширеную версию дистанции будут уже куда значительнее.

Based upon a certain movie, maybe an option could include "flying rubber dog<profanity> to Hong Kong".

Canopy Embrittle.trk

HUH, it's almost like logistics are a core facet of combat operations.. who'da thunk? I understand wanting the spooky, and as it is one of my favorite aircraft of all time, I'd love to see it too. But not seeing why this fits into the sim is a very silly take. The C-130 is known to be a workhorse flying into contested combat zones, delivering critical supplies, reinforcements, equipment you name it- all while getting riddled with bullets, losing an engine or two, and getting out of there under enemy fire. I personally can't wait to do critical logi missions at 250ft above deck, evading manpads and making everyone in the back sick- Oh and when dynamic campaign _eventually_ comes out, it will be a great asset for keeping frontlines supplied.

Da ich ein recht potentes System habe,(AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, 8x 4700 MHz, Wasserkühlung, ASUS GeForce RTX 5090, 32 GB GDDR7, 128 GB DDR5-RAM, Dual Channel (4x 32 GB), 6400 MHz*) ist die Grafik in allen relevanten Bereichen in den höchstmöglichen Einstellungen. Ich nutze auch kein DLSS sondern TAA. Wie gesagt habe ich alle Videos dazu gesehen und bei jedem funktioniert das Gerät einwandfrei. Es kann also nur an mir liegen und das kann erfahrungsgemäß manchmal etwas dauern. Und der Alte tut es ja erstmal auch noch.

the ability to walk-around the aircraft is the only aspect of your list that I would truly enjoy, but I do realize that on a Sim where the majority prefers auto start, it is one of those features that most would try once and then forget about it because they are short on time for this hobby.

Any reason found for this? I'm investigating the mods we're using... but it's still occuring on random stuff. I need a fix for this, it may be related to a lethal lag issue brought on when getting too close to objects. If nothing else it's cluttering up my logs and irritating my inner perfectionist. Either way I certainly want the answers. Lmk! TY!

Heads up display is still planned, I will check with Wags about the road map. thank you

@Calvin.Pimax This doesn't say much, if anything, about the precise date the 57PPD Super production starts.

These are minor issues that could easily be improved. The most important thing is that the mission was successful without any hiccups.

Guess it because we won't be getting one.

Fair enough and sadly true.. so very understandable - but thanks for the answer..

As far as I know, Steam doesn't allow pre-purchase when no fixed release date is set. Since there's no fixed release date yet, there's no Steam pre-purchase. And as far as I know, pre-purchase on Steam is still planned, but it's probably going to be a bit shorter than over here on digitalcombatsimulator.com.

Bonjour à l'équipe DCS, Ceci n'est qu'un constat et non une certitude. F/A-18C, SEAD, missile HARM, mode PB avec code afférent. Lorsque plusieurs batteries SAM sont disposées en profondeur et se recouvrent mutuellement dans un même couloir, le missile HARM n'atteint pas son objectif (radar SR) en mode PB. Si le pilote manœuvre son avion pour attaquer les SAM l'un après l'autre sur ledit couloir, l'émission dudit radar n'est pas manifeste (par exemple dans l'ordre de dangerosité SAM 2, puis 3) et ainsi le code ne peut pas rechercher le radar SR puisqu'il semble ne pas n'émettre pour une raison qui m'échappe. Le constat est qu'un positionnement de plusieurs radars en profondeur l'un derrière l'autre, semble empêcher l’émission ; il n'y a donc pas de recherche et le HARM vole vers n'importe quoi ! Cela me paraît tenir d'une anomalie. Dans ce cas de figure, le pilote doit manœuvrer pour engager chaque batterie de SAM à la perpendiculaire de celle-ci. Cela me semble étrange et c'est une observation libre qui ne me paraît pas correspondre à une réalité. Qu'en pensez-vous, quel est l'avis ou le conseil que vous pourriez apporter ? En pièce jointe, le croquis de la mission incriminée. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is merely an observation and not a certainty. F/A-18C, SEAD, HARM missile, PB mode with corresponding code. When several SAM batteries are positioned in depth and overlap each other in the same corridor, the HARM missile does not reach its target (SR radar) in PB mode. If the pilot maneuvers his aircraft to attack the SAMs one after the other in the corridor, the radar transmission is not obvious (for example, in order of danger SAM 2, then 3) and thus the code cannot search for the SR radar since it does not seem to be transmitting for reasons that escape me. The observation is that positioning several radars deep behind each other seems to prevent transmission; therefore, there is no search and the HARM flies toward anything! This seems to me to be an anomaly. In this case, the pilot must maneuver to engage each SAM battery at right angles to it. This seems strange to me and is an observation that does not seem to correspond to reality. What do you think? What is your opinion or advice? Attached is a sketch of the mission in question.

My view on ED and DCS as a whole is quite similar. I realy appreciate the fact that DCS is not a pay to win, lootbox, skinbyers mess like other online games. I like EDs Idea of what they want to build with it. Although I´m sometimes disappointed about the delvelopment speed or certain decissions (e. g. Dynamic Campaign, F35) DCS with all its shortcomings is still the best combat sim for me. Even considering the other sim that just got a nice graphics refresh, which I like to play also. But man that Razbam situation sucks, and I hope it will not happen again. In the long term, such things have the potential to ruin the whole thing, when they don´t stay the exception.

I'm hoping they'll do aircraft as a cargo also. Fly a C-130 in on some random patch of dirt. Push out a few AH-6 Littlebirds. Set a timer for late activation then have them fly out and destroy some stuff Lol I snipped this from their Discord. Hopefully this will help...

Через меню лончера сделайте восстановление и почистите шейдерный кэш.

Всех приветствую. Пожалуйста, помогите мне с решением данной проблемы. Что это вообще такое? Рандомные объекты каждую секунду спавнятся и исчезают, с видеокартой всё нормально, раньше на пк такого не было. Заранее благодарю! VID-20250728-WA0000.mp4 VID-20250807-WA0008.mp4 VID-20250807-WA0009.mp4

This happens on other maps, as well. It has been discussed before, but possibly related to the date the mission is set to take place? The solution is to enable “Unrestricted SatNav” in the mission, or for your local options.

I think I have very slight astigmatism in my right eye. When people take pictures of me when I am drunk I can see it. Not much, but I can see it in those pictures. So that is why I have tried +1 the last few months on the right eye - and it feels better. But when I look in the mirror (when I am sober) I don't see it as much. I have not look myself in the mirror when I am that drunk for years. So - not sure how that will turn out. Try setting + 1 or -1 (or more) in the offset menu for your left eye. Keep the IPD as you have it now. See if it feels better or worse. No problem adjusting it back if it gets worse or doesn't help. Not sure if it is needed to calibrate eye tracking after this. I have not done that, and it works still as expected.

Low level 500lb at 90' 1000lb at 90' ..

good idea

Are you guys also accepting applications from overseas? I'm from Germany. The Mission Timeframe from 1900z - 2359z fits well.