All Activity

Yeah exactly. The fix is done and will be available as soon as new Phantom builds are published and make it your way. That has not happened yet but will hopefully soon be the case

Here's the missing axes that I plan to report. I've also found a few bugs (clock and KM-2 instrument). Please check if I forgot anything. PILOT : ARK-15 Volume Knob Radio Jadro-1A Volume Radio Jadro-1A Squelch Knob Radio R-828 Volume Knob Radio R-863 Volume Knob SPU-8 Main Volume Knob SPU-8 Intercom Volume Knob Altimeter Baro Pressure Pilot Knob RMI-2, Course Rotary Knob ((autopilot route azimuth)) PKP72M Pitch Trim Knob Greben Latitude Knob SPUU-52 Test Adjustment Knob Recorder MC-61 Brightness Knob RV-5 Dangerous Altitude Knob ((radar Altimeter Adjust)) Sight, Manual Firing Distance Adjustment Knob Sight, Moving Crosshair Brightness Adjustment Knob Sight, Moving Crosshair Horizontal Adjustment Knob Sight, Moving Crosshair Vertical Adjustment Knob Sight, Fixed Grid Brightness Adjustment Knob Sight, Target Base Adjustment Knob Radio R-852 Volume Knob (keys are also missing?) Backup ADI Vertical Adjustment Knob (keys are also missing?) Cabin Pressure (keys are also missing?) Autopilot Heading Channel Delta Correction Knob (keys are also missing?) Autopilot Roll Channel Delta Correction Knob (keys are also missing?) Autopilot Attitude Channel Delta Correction Knob (keys are also missing?) Pilot Clock bugs to be reported : Clock Left Knob / Clock Right Knob CPG : ARK-15 Volume Knob SPU-8, Main Volume Knob SPU-8, Intercom Volume Knob Left Timer Interval Knob Right Timer Interval Knob Baro Pressure Knob RMI-2, Course Rotary Knob ((autopilot route azimuth)) (keys are also missing?) Sight Light Brightness Knob (keys are also missing?) CPG Clock bugs to be reported : Clock Left Knob / Clock Right Knob (strange behaviour) Deviation compensator bug to be reported : KM-2 Set Magnetic declination (value does not change)

Well, the last F-4E patches from Heatblur are from May 21st. The fix was confirmed June 30. So the fix might have made it but the HB patches are still to come. Let's w8&c

So the fix might not have made it? Issue is still present

This is the new “industry standard” - eternal early access. People keep buying EA because that’s all there is. It is not a matter of patience because the full release will never come, or come when the game/module is outdated and irrelevant. The warbirds sim market is currently at a low between the tides. The previous major product has moved on to Korea era, and while it has a Mosquito its outdated interface, ridiculous key binding scheme, and no clickable cockpits, make it a no-go for me. There are some new sims preparing to enter the market, but they are still not ready - the competition will be most welcomed! I actually came to DCS just because of the Mosquito module, as soon as it was announced. Non of the new sims will have a Mosquito for many years ahead - the DCS module is all we will have at a high sim level. Luckily, my other “must have” is F6F Hellcat, and this is expected to be offered by at least one promising new sim. If they make it in time, I may consider not getting “early access” from DCS.

Sorry, I know it's a little bit off topic, but will the MIG-29 available with such a German paint scheme ?

Albania

A lot can be reused in the works but it's still new external model, whole new rear cockpit, FM, DM, MP synch code, liveries...

Не, не охватил. На всё интересное не хватает времени, симулятор наш огромен! Скриптами много ништяков уже существует. Включая полную подмену ATC. Но скриптами.

At a steady 72fps, VD has a latency of about 35-40 ms which includes game, encoding, networking and deciding latencies. I presume that with DP the only major latency is game latency? So with a maximum game latency of 13.8 ms (to maintain 72 fps) the overall DP latency would be about 20 ms. Am I working this out correctly? I don't know what the latencies are through oculus link cable, but the bitrate is 960 mbps h264 vs 150 mbps HEVC10 with VD. So I presume the latency would be a bit less with oculus link!? Do these latencies affect eye tracking? Is the tracking better through DP vs a link with compression?

Comparing the Quest 3 and the Crystal Super on a system with a 9800X3D and a RTX 5090 is … silly I think. I have a 9950X3D (which in games I understand is comparable to 9800X3D) and a RTX 5090 - and I have both the Quest 3 and Crystal Super. The difference in is huge. I understand that Pimax has a pretty low requirement for the Super on their website. Personally I think that is misleading. I personally wouldn’t run it on a system without a RTX 5090 and a good CPU. Maybe a 4090. I have a system with a 4090 too (see signature), but for me that is unsatisfying… You CAN run it on a lower end system, and obviously you do. But I think it is a waste of money because you are missing out on what the Crystal Super has to offer, why it even exists- and you might as well spend your money elsewhere. I understand your concern, because first - the Crystal Super is super expensive- and paying for a RTX 5090 is very very expensive too. Is it worth it? For me - yes. But I am an older dude, Flight sims has been my hobby since 1983, and the investment didn’t bother me as much. 15 years ago I could not have afforded it. Yes, you can super sample the Quest 3 more with a RTX 5090 than with your 3080. It will run a lot better of course than with your present graphics card. But still - physically the Crystal Super has 327% more pixels than the Quest 3 to show…. But with your 3080 you don’t get the experience that is intended with the Crystal Super. What should you do? Don’t know. It’s a lot of money. Maybe enjoy what you have, or try to get a “cheaper” second hand RTX 4090 and enjoy your Quest 3 even better. The Quest 3 gets quite an uplift going from a 3080 to a 4090. Especially since the rest of your system is good.

Ты летал кампанию Arctic Thunder за F-16? Там взаимодействие с наземным персоналом сделали почти божественно. Естественно скрипты, но это показывает то, что в теории возможно.

I came to the same conclusion on Aug 6 when I posted this: I tried more fuse combos today but they all exploded on contact. Plugs made no difference unless used N and T, when no explosion will occur. The correct use for a 5 or11 second delay tail fuse AN M116, is for very low level and the nose plug in, but it explodes on contact. The only one that provided a usable delay was nose fuse Mk 244 mod 1, (anti submarine), which gave 4 secs with switch in N/T psition. Oh well, keep plodding on. The M135 A1 and M136 A1 air burst fuse actually works! This timed nose fuse was a thing before radar alt was used. Minimum setting 5 secs. (should be 10), Never used by the Navy, but could be a fun thing to try.

Потом, есть варианты взаимодействия с наземным персоналом по СПУ через внешнюю фишку подключения техника, а есть с помощью визуальных команд и сигналов, подаваемых как экипажем, так и техником, что смоделировано лишь частично в игре. Наиболее подробно у палубников в модуле суперкерриера, а так же в модуле Фантома от Хитблюр, в котором свой техник в комплекте. У МиГа стандартный DCS техник. Насколько с ним можно будет приблизиться к реальным процедурам?

Говоря отвлеченно от горячо ожидаемого МиГа, предполагаю, большинство пользователей упрощают и ускоряют свои запуски с целью экономии времени. Когда его мало, сложно кайфовать 20 минут, ожидая полной выставки инерциалок и т.п. Особенно после того, как в сетевой игре стало можно добавлять слоты с горячим стартом. В игре нет промежуточного варианта, близкого к жизни, когда ИТС предоставляет экипажу (пилоту) самолёт с подключенным электропитанием и уже выполненными выставками и проверками большей части оборудования. Мы сейчас получаем холодный старт в варианте, когда пилот пришел на самолёт, с которым техники ничего не делали, но которые могут в мгновение ока подвесить оружие, которое на самом деле долго вешается, или прикрутить надвтулочный радар Апачи прямо над вращающимся несущим винтом и т.д. Плюс сезонные особенности эксплуатации конкретных типов, увеличивающие время процедур. Поэтому будем играть с подходящей нам индивидуальной подробностью все равно, ибо без компромиссов не обойтись пока.

What I expected was that it recorded normally and that's it (Although the trajectory of the normal record and then drifting inexplicably, which is quite funny)

https://forum.dcs.world/topic/376011-external-wing-drop-tanks/#findComment-5686749

Question gentlemen: are any of the elevators on the Big E animated? If the number 1 elevator is not animated, that would make fixing its shape really easy as I could just do it with a texture. -Woog

To put it in basic terms every time I try and update the down load size it too big (says not enough disk space). So I erase terrains (maps) to make space as they are big files and it just increases the download size by the map size I erased. So it wants to redownload the map. I opened a support ticket and had them delicense 3 maps I never use and it still is having issues and trying to do a massive download for an update. I also did the repair thing with support and that did not help. How do I update?

So I am on the trial period of 14 days with 2 left. I have dialed in my settings as best I vmcan on a 3080 Ti. Comparing it to my Quest 3, the Q3 is a little better. The lenses are clear with no screen door effect and the colors are also better. I am assuming the PCS can get much better if I had a 5090, but so would the Q3. Maybe not as much, but $1800 plus 2 grad for a 5090 is a lot for only a little better. Also, even though I have upgraded my CPU, I still show CPU bound. How much better will the PCS be vs the Q3 with a 5090?

It’s related to QV, but I recall some users reporting that with SSAO turned off, the box doesn’t show up.

https://www.amazon.ca/Ergonomic-Keyboard-Compatible-Laptop-Workstation/dp/B0DWJ3HGJL?

Да, она бесплатная

Have you seen Tallymouse’s video on the DCS × Pimax Crystal Super setup guide?