Leaderboard

The original intention for the New HDR presets was to make SOFT the same as the original DCS HDR. However this did not make it into the patch (Hopefully the next one). The HDR presets enclosed with 1.1.0.8 were the ones I was tweaking before I got it right. In the meantime, attached is the HDR.fx that was originally intended for 1.1.0.8 It returns the Original DCS HDR on the SOFT setting. NORMAL is the 1.1.0.7 HDR and HARD is a more saturated contrasted HDR. Backup and then replace the \Bazar\shaders\PostMotionEffect\HDR\hdr.fx with the one attached in hdr.zip. Nate hdr.zip

Че вы накинулис как питухи? Я могу дать запись этой Мухе, но он адрес не назвал. Говорит на форуме напиши, а миня на форум ихний ни пускаит и ни дает зарегистрировоться.

new textures available for download.

Note G-meter...:)

Many Mod builders had the placebo modelled pretty good with some of the sound mods. "Ah that sounds so real now!" (Sarcasm detection enabled)

Nothing, it's just there to let you know the APU Gen is no longer providing power to the aircraft systems and can be switched off.

Just to get the thread back on track.... ... Hey Mower, what brand of flight gloves did you end up buying for A-10C?

Note it is very hard to model the Placebo effect, it took Yo-Yo a good solid month of tweaking to get it right. Nate

Yes, it is fixed in v1.1.0.8

And further OT we go... However, it's funnier than arguing about hardcoreness...

I hit the speed I need at the angle I need, then trim the aircraft to match. Simple reason do do that is so that you don't have to concentrate on more in the cockpit besides watching airspeed and altitude on approach, in perfect conditions in all reality there is much more going on at times depending. You never adjust trim for vertical velocity, unless you are trying to maintain climb at speed. I think we just had a misunderstanding, we are talking about the same thing in two different ways lol.

Are you suggesting he's not hardcore? :D

Ваши восторги деятельностью ЕD я понять могу. Понять, но не принять. Не знаю, какую конечную цену объявит издатель за программу, но при объявленной цене в 60$ я сразу говорю: цена не ориентирована на рынок СНГ. Не мне, канешна, учить издателей маркетингу, но даже первокурснику известно - чем больше цена продукта соответствует покупательной способности потребителя, тем больше покупателей продукта среди этого потребителя. Следовательно, больше и доход. Посудите сами, если, 1000 человек сможет купить продукт за 10$, то это будет больший доход, чем если 100 человек купят продукт за 60$. Поэтому поумерьте пыл, и давайте смотреть на вещи реальнее. P.S. Я не за себя говорю (у меня хватит зелени и за 100 купить), мне за державу обидно (я порядка 100 вирпилов отслеживаю - знаю о чём говорю).

Вот так примерно.

Готов уже сейчас оплатить предзаказ...ED чтото раздобрели) на будущие проекты, жаль хотелок много, вот только сил к сожалению на это не хватит у наших любимых ED.

ROFL... Maybe it's the squared cross-section of the air-intakes. :huh: :megalol:

Если эта "ша" будет делаться как новый проект по времени то тогда это как в поговорке "хер на хер менять только время терять". Вполне достаточно той акулы какая она есть и мне она нравится. А так вообще я конечно больше за Дальневосточный театр с куском Аляски может быть и МиГ-31 как старт)). Вообще новый движок новый театр другой уровень симуляции вот что лучше а не выжимание соков из старичка Lock on.

If you're rearming with that, you're probably doing something wrong in the realism department ;)

Work in progress. FYI: I have already made a working prototype for the interface, for the 32-bit version. We are testing it, as we speak. It looks like the 64-bit version (the one that's really 'in demand') will require a bit more attention, since the 32-bit DLL can probably not be loaded in that version. To be continued...:book:

Будьте первыми хоть и в виртуальном мире но всё же первыми. Сделайте на радость всем поклонникам Ка 50.

Not to mention that the performance boost from double/triple/(and most likely quad) channel is pretty small. You'll not see a difference in most applications.

Вчира зашол политать на ваш сервер и от меня пелот по имени Муха патербовал предоставить ему запись. Эта у вас всигда так? Я хотел ему преслать запись, меня не регестрирует на вашем форуме пачему то. Почему Муха захотел запись?

Here is a threat guide i made.. has a table from PlainSight too. http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=68182&highlight=threat+guide

В общем тупиковая хотелка получилось с модернизацией. Всё как в Отечественной оборонке. Денег нет - вертолёта нет. А там испытывайте себе разные комплексы хоть до <beep>. С такой позицией о Российской технике вообще можно забыть в рамках DCS. Хотелось бы прямой ответ хотя бы на надежду модернизации графической составляющей. Я за платный аддон, но с современной реализацией кокпита.

Here is one I made for FC with the encyclopedia data and estimates. Should be pretty close for A-10C. Any one care to fill in blanks or correct data, please post a copy. Excel file http://www.mediafire.com/?m765c0h2hczy64o

Alright, first off take a valium. then realize computers are evil, right? I've been where you are many times and it always sucks. Sorry i wasnt araound today... 14 hour day. Now re-read that previous post of mine... i want you to fly A-10 on autopilot not arma, sorry about that. answer those questions too please. If a-10 plays on autoipilot with no stick attached then we know its the stick is either f00ked up or is drawing too much power. please read my posts carefully... I have 10,000 hours of PC diagnostic time and repair over 1,000 computers a year. I ask those questions and make those suggestions for a reason. ya dont read and answer them, your stuff aint gettin fixed. I Guaran-freakin-Tee you we're going to fix this.... hang in there. and remember, Computers are......

Go ahead. Rub salt in it. Harder.

I felt pretty much like this - pretty bummed out, and this was the response I got which I was perfectly happy with. You can tinker around with options.lua, but bear in mind it's not in any way 'officially' supported. "I know that as a user it might look strange, but there are non-trivial reasons why 32-bit systems is a problem, and in the specific case of 1.1.0.8 there was completely new stuff introduced that caused further issues. (You might not as a user see it, but just take my word that the software is complex and sometimes a superficially small change requires major changes elsewhere.) The 32-bit address space is just too small, and corners have to be cut to accomodate it. So sadly, in my own personal opinion: just spend the 80 dollars it costs to update to a non-ancient operating system. The 64-bit switch is 5 years overdue for computer games and they need to start taking advantage of what is offered." So essentially, the requirements of running on high between 1.1.0.7 and 1.1.0.8 have changed due to code being changed behind what we (users) see. So...64 bit seems to be the way to go!

The link is in this thread, I posted mine in case someone else can help there too :) http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=74785

:P If you want tips or anything, my offer stands. PM me and I'll look into helping you out. I feel your pain. I hope you understand that I cannot comment on the specifics of what was changed and why. It's not necessarily a huge thing but it's not up to me - NDA etc. What I'd say though (as a QA type person) is that you might be looking a bit "too close to home". Common problem in QA is to look for the cause of an issue only at the obvious neighborhood, but the solution might be found proverbially "far away". Speaking personally, I actually feel that it is a scandal that ED is one of the first companies to make the "switch" to 64-bit. We've had the technology hardware-wise for many many years, and even XP has a version to exploit it. Personally I ran my first 64-bit home system somewhere around 2005 - a whopping 6 years ago! My analysis is basically that there's no real motive for the "big guys" to make the transition, since they're still supporting equally old consoles with rediculously starved memory budgets. Takes a company with no stake in consoles to finally use the hardware we've had in our machines since the first Athlon64's... The stagnation of the "mainsteam" PC gaming market is evident in the fact that even the really major delivery platform Steam does not support it. Games running 64-bit mode natively need to use their own protection systems, since there's zero support for it in Steam itself. And before DCS:A-10C there was no 64-bit support in TrackIR. Basically, my opinion is that it's a huge "fo shame" on the entire gaming industry. :(

I hope we do get the FC3 (Mower's Crusade notwithstanding) since DCS:Flanker (or Fulcrum or whatever Soviet) seems questionable now given the new ED business model? We can surely spare another $30 or so for all the improvements. BTW, if FC3 gets binned because of the high opposing post count on the forums, we know where you live Mower!! More or less, that is.. Canada ain't that big!!

Excellent news, NullCharacter and OhmWrecker. Since I consider this to be the best outcome possible, I am locking the thread.

Can't get much better than Bob Hoover himself.:thumbup: Here you go.

I should probably make it known that Ohm and I were able to reconcile our differences via PM. He is welcome to join my server anytime. The line between just goofing around and being a nuisance can be quite thin sometimes. We just both happened to see his actions on different sides of this line. All's well that ends well.

Checking out the E-2D in the editor. It looks cool. Nice to get rid of the old model, that was hideous :)

It feels to good to make others happy.

Thanks!:lol: - always happy to read comments like yours! +rep inbound! @Froglips How about your experience ?

thanks, sorry didn't read carefull enough .. hope I can make it on friday, not 100% sure though .. have a nice flight, guys Julius edit: Can I still join the session if I'm 30min too late ? I don't know if I can make it in time.

Ну и Бог с ним, с МиГ, на Су-27 такая штука тоже не помешала бы... P.S. 2 volk, помнится мне ты раньше сам шельмил эти ракеты (таквью выкладывал с невероятными доворотами, пруфы различные...), если не прав - поправь, что изменилось с тех пор? :) И про мозги этих ракет, у некоторых ракет в игре они очень даже присутствуют и с лихвой компенсируют отсутствие оных у тех, кто ими стреляет, а если и у стреляющих мозги есть, то начинают рождаються легенды про читаров ;) Только, пожалуйства без теоритических выкладок, мне холивар неинтересен очередной, просто, что же поменялось? :) И это, не спеши меня тоже записывать к ганзистам, ганзо на свистках я считаю извратом и уж тем более не хочу что бы это явление стало массовым... на самолетах времен ВМВ ганзить гораздо интереснее и веселее ИМХО.

On french forum's a lot of squadron are excited! Some nice screens by Poliakov Again and again thank's!

I understand that. My point was to mention what his new MB and CPU were designed for. Against the memory he purchased. That was all.