Sierra99

rel4y I deleted my posts because I didn't want to hyjack a TQS thread with suncom questions... :music_whistling: Sorry for the confusion. As far as I know the moderators won't do that to individual threads. :smilewink:

Thank You

" That being said, Frattin added that the Navy had certain missions it only used the Hornet for, due to weapons loadout testing that had been conducted with the Hornet but never repeated on the Super Hornet." “We have some unique capabilities that, I’m wondering who’s going to pick up the slack when we’re not here anymore, because for some things we do we’re the only ones who can do it,” he said." Interesting...

OK Got that fixed... What about adding additional Client Slots? Just add them to an existing group or create a new group?

XLS file wont open if person doesnt have MS access...

Hey Deadly...Two Questions... A.) Is it possible to remove AI aircraft from either side without breaking the scripts? (I.E. No U.S. Aircraft on RED and Vice Versa) 2.) Is it possible to add additional Client Wing-men?

Was that just with in game triggers? that sounds really useful...

Hey, Can one of you Skin Whisperers take a look at this skin and figure out why it has stopped working? It looks like a couple of the .dds files are corrupted but I have no clue how to fix it. https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/2763167/

OK the Fix for this issue is to do the following... 1.) Add the attached f-16-glass.bmp to each aircraft's folder. (Not the RAR file...the bmp file inside. Apparently you cant attach a .bmp file to messages) 2.) Using Notepad++ or similar, cut and paste the following line to the each aircraft's description.lua. after {"texture F-16.tga f2 g0", 0, "f-16_haf.tga", true}, line. It should look like this {"texture F-16.tga f2 g0", 0, "f-16_haf.tga", true}, {"texture F-16.tga f2 g0",0,"f-16-glass.bmp",false}; Save and re-enable mod. Canopies > SHOULD < look correct again... I take no credit for ANY of this...just sharing how I fixed mine. AMMV! f-16-glass.bmp.rar

Target...not fire at. firing requires the shooter have its radar on. But as far as tracking to the point of FIRING...I think they can share the data...But not sure thats something the F-18 is capable of

Herr Wags stated: " Next will be E-2/E-3 SURV data and then network correlation. " I tried googling this but really got no place. (Well except right back to Matt's Video...) I know Modern Fighters can send and receive sensor data via data link with E2s and E3s. My question is can they employ weapons using that data? Does the MIDS Allow the F-18 to target other aircraft without turning its radar on relying solely on E2/E3 data?

https://www.shapeways.com/product/YWFQLYG9C/thrustmaster-tailpiece-13-deg-ang-15-deg-off?optionId=61170711

The way you mounted the switches is genius!

RustBelt... Can this switch be tipped while pressed? (Z axis and one of the other axis at the same time?)

These skins have stopped working...well the canopy has anyway... Everything looks fine but the entire canopy is a shiny missing texture placeholder. Other than that these skins are outstanding!

If the end result is what we see in the screen...you take all the time you need. We will remember how well it was done far longer than how fast it was done.

https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=218487 I think the general rules listed here apply across the board.

I do t have a NATOPS handy. How does the “simplified” procedure you’re using compare to he actual NATOPS?

I doubt you will see this released to Open Beta First.

Two Weeks

Got mine two weeks ago...drilled a small hole in the clip and use a computer case screw to attach it as shown. It DOES NOT MOVE!

Check this thread out... https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3635383&postcount=1

AI F-16s WILL call MAGNUM! :)

I haven't been able to find a single example on the internet of ANY Advanced Soviet SAM systems ever being engaged by HARMs. None. Zilch. Nada. With that in mind I'd say the position they can be easily shot down is inaccurate...based on the available data. Real world events would also indicate much greater fear of HARMs by SAM crews than stated. During Operation Allied Force we were supporting a SEAD package one night near Gospic. Each F-16CJs was equipped with 2 HARMs each. After refueling the receivers went on their way and while listening to the strike frequency we heard numerous "MAGNUM" calls and expected to go home early. When our receivers returned, They still had all of their HARMs. When I asked the pilot over Boom Interphone about the "MAGNUM" calls the pilot said they were making those calls "in the clear". Whenever the Yugoslavian SAM sites heard the word "MAGNUM"...they IMMEDIATELY switched off their radars...why waste a half million dollar missile when simply saying a word on the radio eliminated the threat. This is a game...The HARM is new and needs tweaking...But to imply because they are easy to kill in real life because they are easy in the game is not realistic.

No Hunter this is a game. While ED strives to achieve as much accuracy as possible, they are not building a military grade simulation and giving it away for free on the internet. That being said, The capabilities of each weapon are an approximation of their capabilities based on the opinions of the testers and programmers.