Sierra99

Ray tracing is a no go? What are ya basing this on?

I think more people would be interested in Normandy if ED did a modernized version of it. You could pretty much keep the landscape the same...just makeover urban areas with a mix of modern buildings with the older buildings and trade out dirt strips for modern runways.

Looks Good...

DEVRIM YOU ARE A ROCKSTAR!

Since APKWS is a weapon add on...it shouldn't require anything more than a laser designator to be utilized... Or Was there a significant enough ballistics change it requires new software?

Are you using the Stennis or the older carrier?

The F-117As DESIGN is what was classified...With few exceptions, they were literally built with off the shelf components. "To lower development costs, the avionics, fly-by-wire systems, and other parts were derived from the General Dynamics F-16 Fighting Falcon, McDonnell Douglas F/A-18 Hornet and McDonnell Douglas F-15E Strike Eagle. The parts were originally described as spares on budgets for these aircraft, to keep the F-117 project secret." The parts that were more classified, the INS, Targeting system etc can easily be simulated without compromising any secret information. As far as stealth...again, it is easier to simulate stealth in a computer game than it is to create it in real life.

Honestly one of the reason I seldom fly the A-10 was the shiny clean cockpit...thanks for doing this. Any way to make this compatible with cockpit livery format?

Hawkeye I completely missed this post. Thank you for making quick work of those.

Post a link to someone with Eagle Dynamics next to their name...otherwise you can not support your comments.

Reconnoissance assets like the TR-1 / Global Hawk / RC-135s...HVAA targets C-5Bs...Strategic Airlift KC-10A Extender...( NKAWTG...NOBODY!) a fixture in the gulf for over 25 years. AC/MC-130 Special Ops Birds. MH-60G Pave Hawk / More paint schemes for the Ch-47 / MH-53J/M Pave Low F-22A, For starts..

All of those things can be implemented with proper mission design...both from an AI perspective...and from a player perspective. This would be a day 1 buy for me...For that matter ANY US heavy lift Helicopter wound be a day one buy for me.

It was a demonstrator...never intended for combat.

Step 5...VERY IMPORTANT...:megalol:

Gents I need a couple of dimensions... How "Deep" is the cockpit on each side of the seat... How "Tall" is the center column that holds the CB panel and Nav control panel from the floor to bottom of instrument panel? Thanks in advance Sierra

Yes indeed... (Phfat Phfingered that...thanks. )

Gents have any of you used panels or gauges from this company? If so how hard was it to interface the gauges with DCS? PCFlightS.com <fixed it> The Panals look great and the prices look very reasonable.

Thanks for all the suggestions gentlemen.

And I inserted a comma where there was none... "I certainly would not consider a 1080Ti, ancient tech." Completely changes what you would have been saying had I not put words in your mouth. my apologies... I think the biggest thing it comes down to is last week I was mulling over the fact I have 2 kidneys and no 1080TI... THIS week...the price for a 1080TI has fallen to the point I can keep all of my internal organs AND have a smoking fast video card...but that is assuming the 2070 is hype...which the jury is out on.

LAWL...No apology necessary. Perhaps all the world needs is a little rum to settle its differences. I spent a great deal of my adult life deployed to that part of the world...The only real Gem was when we deployed to Diego Garcia in the Indian Ocean. That being said...there ARE good people there and there are some AMAZING places to visit.

Ya know the many members of the military have been advocating for years that we need to have wars in countries with Sandy Beaches, Rum and Mai Tai's and bikini clad ladies on the beach...But those people don't want to have a war they wanna have a party... If there was Rum and Mai Tai's in the Middle east there would be no war.

1.) the keynote took place in Germany. Not sure what he was inferring about it happening at 2AM his time. 2.) nobody has hands on the hardware yet. This is nothing but opinion. Simple fact is everything bloggers had to say prior to yesterday was flat out wrong sooooo...

"Ancient Tech"? Well ok...Now let's look at this from an adult point of view. In the real world adults have many many obligations to worry about that are far more important than wether or not their video card is "Ancient". The people who couldn't afford 750.00 for a 1080TI Friday can't suddenly afford a 999.00 2080ti today. However, they might be able to squeeze out 450.00 for 1080 now that prices dropping. Personally I know a several people who will be more than happy to use what you dismiss as "ancient tech" because it will be a giant step up from what they are currently using. Check Amazon...prices are already coming down less than 24 hours after the announcement. Dismissing what was cutting edge on Friday as ancient tech on Tuesday is arrogant. In short...tech will always be evolving. Buy what you can afford and be happy with your purchase.

https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=195464

The question I have is this...There are literally DOZENS of equipment and vehicle models we could use for mission building that are part of the static environment. Fire Bottles, AGE equipment, tool boxes, Light stands are there...but not in the ME. Why? Are those objects different from what we are able to place via the mission editor? If they are not, is there a way to break them out and use them? (By that I mean convince ED to break them out as separate items.)