FSKRipper

+1 :music_whistling:

You can find a training mission (with additional info) for every of the campaign missions plus a checklist (ramp start eg) for printing. This is the most basic form of training you will find. Most other A-10 campaigns will need the skills you develop during trainings. Btw pilots life including trainings are always test which will be scored...

Ok, I will try it the careful way. You are judging the whole DCS Mirage 2000C FM by one factor (G onset in this case) and draw the conclusion that it is nowhere to real (proven by a limited quality video of a possible M2000C - my opinion). As I implied earlier the FM consists of myriads of code where G-onset is a factor of 1% at best (educated guess). As you said earlier you are no expert in this plane nor FBW systems (as I). To get to the point: Telling the developers and the community (especially the ones who know what they talk about) that the whole FM is way off and nowhere to real by a factor which is only a minor fraction of the whole thing, (and a known issue btw - you didn't see it so let's forget this part) makes me realize how calm and relaxed this community can be sometimes - or in other words If it was my FM code I would be seriously offended... Edit: I have no idea if there is some kind of language barrier between us (I'm no native speaker) but it sounds very arrogant in my translation. I have no idea from where you are, but eventually it was meant another way. But I'm pretty sure I wasn't the only one who interpreted it this way. A good example of this is: "I found bug x. Please fix it tomorrow with a hotfix, Friday at latest. It's urgent for me!"

Happy Birthday Chizh! :holiday: Hope you got a day off

Maybe this citation gives you an idea why people are a bit suspicious :

I never called you an idiot nor I denied open issues with the FM. But taking a bad quality video of unknown origin showing a plane, maybe a M2000 and concluding that the complete FM is far from the original one based on this video deserves not more then :doh: But maybe we simply have different views of what an evidence is...

:doh: Great Mr. Expert. What of the thousands of code lines is wrong as well as the (atm possible) G-Buildup problem?

It's a known lighting issue. The complete 2.x lighting system is WIP. BTW this isn't in any way related to the Harrier. Open Alpha Forum would be the correct one.

Laut Wags wird es sowohl eine 2.5 Stable als auch eine 2.5 Open Beta geben. https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3327673&postcount=733

Ever thought about pedals? Is more close to the real one and saves you the waiting time at the hand surgeon :music_whistling: Sorry but regarding all your bug reports including the useless mirage it seems some kind of overacting... BTW... wrong forum section

Am I a software developer? No Do I deal with them? From time to time If you work with them regularly you should at least understand a part of ED's policy... That said I can understand your problems but there will be a reason why ED went back from the Wednesday patches (with 2 days for Hotfixes till weekend). If we are happy with it is written on another sheet of paper.

Must be some weird kind of Christmas joke :huh:

You have no idea..... As already said, somebody will always complain. For me the Beta is not a version to play with but to test and report bugs. Simply accept that with such a complex software from many different developers bugs will be included in each Version (even stable). It will keep your blood pressure down and prolong your life expectancy.

Here is a short test so please forgive my incompetent flying. The hit on the SA-15 is logged. I think the main problem is in fact not the hit probability but the damage output. Due to the current hitpoint model (and maybe one hitbox for simple ground models?) we won't get anything better atm until ED introduces fragment damage. I'm with Tharos that simply increasing the damage output would be adjusting on the wrong end... I'm not a coder so I won't comment on anything but maybe ED can make a workaround like hit by sidearm = radar silent... Sidearm.trk

Hatte Chizh in einer Diskussion zur Yak-52 mal erwähnt. https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3299292&postcount=435 Finde ich für eine Free to play jetzt nicht zu groß. Wie gesagt was nutzt mir als Interessierter Neuling ein 4GB Download wenn ich danach höchstens die Credits lesen kann. Ok, evtl noch ein Blick in die Enzyklopädie...

Aber ist der Download eines Clients ohne die "free for all" map nicht sinnlos? Wenn ich keine der anderen Maps besitze hab ich nichts als das Gui und als Besitzer der anderen Karten ist die Kaukasus-Map ja auch kein Brocken mehr...

EDIT: I suppose you are right. After several tests I found that the damage of the EWR happens in 2 out of ten times (maybe because it's so big?) All other units will be destroyed or missed (what is intended IMO).

Ok strange. Time will tell I think. The EWR's simply stopped sending.

It seems much better than that if I'm not total wrong here. Made some tests with EWR's and the sidearms don't kill the whole unit but the radar... What a feature :joystick:

Thanks Jojo. Your words fit much better than mine. By countersteering I meant bringing the stick back to neutral by force :thumbup:

Hmm, the first is a list with mainly HUD displays, the second video can't be viewed from 3:52 because it's only 3:52 long... And yes, there is a need to compare the stick position otherwise you don't know if the pilot maybe gives short inputs for correction or countersteers which can be quiet common in demo flights

Could you supply some links please? I had problems finding videos of the 2000-C where stick position and roll ratio are clearly visible the same time.

I would agree on that. With 5° Flaps in HUD symbology the 3D model of the flaps looks like a clean 0° line with the rest of the wing.

In this case you should keep your hands off Early Access software and wait for a release version. I prefer weekly updates even with some flaws. Some parts like the CCIP line are missing but there are also noticable steps foward...

Wow, what an ego trip. Not considering buying any of the polychop modules makes we wonder what you are doing here in this subforum. It can't be constructive critics since you are judging something you don't own :huh: