D4n

Dear HB team, on november 4th you promised the DCS community that you would "write up a guide on the new FARP mechanics", has this guide been released yet? If not, why not yt? (there's also basically still not a single YouTube video out there that explains how to use them in mission editor) @Cobra847@RagnarDa And does only server-admin require Viggen module to place invisible FARP in his mission, or will even all players require it to rearm, refuel and repair on that type of FARP? (the insanely epic realistic invisible FARPs add so much more realism!)

Wow over 600 views after only 4 hours, imagine if even only half of those applied, that email inbox would be bomb-full oh dear, good luck!

RFQ? Where did you read that? And what should not be serious here? That Website looks quite legit to me.

"robbie tank" might refer to this (not sure where the term "robbie" comes from.): https://robertsonfuelsystems.com/defense/combo-pak-internal-auxiliary-fuel-system-iafs/

What's your source for this? @microvax

What?? How would you know?

Yes, please find a solution, please move the older "guides & tutorials" forum into the new section for example... DCS forum main page is already long enough...... (even WITH russian- and language-forum sections collapsed!!!! see below picture...)@NineLine

"Out of range"-definition for TOR is plain wrong currently, the trackfiles/videos prove it (missile still has speed to easily reach target, but then simply explodes). negative, nothing about "hijacking" in rule 1.14. Rule 1.5 is about "hijacking", but my SAM post is related to @Mad_Shell's post about reeeally detailed complaining about what's wrong with SA-2 currently.

There still is this way worse Tor issue......

Strange, because afaik, each missile is launched manually on SA-2, not automatically x seconds after 1st missile.....

Then link to the OP instead of to the entire thread please, thanks... avoids unnecessary confusion @Flappie https://forums.eagle.ru/topic/253259-already-reportedsa-2-misses-100-of-the-time-due-to-lag-pursuit/?tab=comments#comment-4485567

OMG NICE!! (I feared I wouldn't witness this day ^^) your "this track" link is wrong though, @Flappie

I replied to QuiGon in a private message because of that, thank you. The good thing is that ED is working on improving multiplayer-experience for everyone (with new server-hosting terms of service), so not too long from now on Xcom hopefully (and most likely) will open at least 1 (better 2 probably) additional new job vacancies (as volunteers or maybe even with some pocket money from BF Patreon, if that financially works out ) for the position of "BlueFlag managers", to assist him (Xcom).

Very sad that the other BuddySpike members had to retire and that Xcom isn't recruiting new admins and not letting his moderators take care of player-related actions, but that he instead feels the need to personally act on his own quite limited knowledge of player-related actions. (quite limited due to him apparently not having the time to read the discord chat if a specific situation occured.) Please let the moderators handle things, they have the time to get the bigger and entire picture of player-actions, and act accordingly.

Thread should remain open until some military radio-wave specialists who in a few years will be former RWR engineers reply in a few years in this thread and declassify what the RWRs of 1990-2000 were capable off.

- No UPK-23 gun pod (not installed on Russian Mi-24P's). ok, but what about the 10x more exciting full-auto YaK-B gunpods? Will we at least have those? Mi-24s in Afghanistan were employing R-60 against ground targets. wait, buuuut... which heat-sources on the ground, since there were no ground-vehicles in Afghanistan, riiiight? Or afghans riding on motorbikes? wtf, crazy war. o_o

wow, okay! [google translate: "ED still do not fully know what this law is, plus it came out just now, and the topic is already half a year"]

Please add english subtitles like with the Chizh interview from end 2020. (I'd even be willing to pay for useful english subtitles, if that helps.)

They could've simply placed (funny in some ways, but still mostly useful) english subtitles under the video, just like they did with this waaaay too few views - interesting Chizh interview... EDIT: oh wow, it has automatic subtitles, nice, will give it a try!

The video is in russian? And why not on ED YouTube channel? Strange.

Lol what, how did they miss my video... omg fascinating, how the AKG seeker rendered every single rivet on the Tomcat's fuselage ^^

hey, so the part "an array of antitank guided missiles" in here means that ED is promising us both Phalanga and Shturm missiles, right?

The fact that ED ignores this thread only increases the likelihood for the theory that sb. prohibits them to have the more realistic logic implemented that we had up until 2019... Why oh why does this make me think of this recent ED-statement: Hmmmmmm......

That explains why ED appears to be taking a suuuper relaxed pace at this issue...

on the SLAM ALSO?? How many Hornet-lovers did complain about that then, so far? zero? one? two? Or is ED not taking Hornet-flyers complaints serious?