amalahama

Any news on this side? Regards

Nope, the Spanish Navy had vanilla AV-8B (not N/A version though), which were upgraded to Plus at the end of the nineties Today some airframes which weren't upgraded are still flying for training purposes. Regards!

In BMS forums they run some tests against the oficial performance graphs and at some altitudes and speeds the a/c matched reasonably well, but for others it was way off. The FM has run several iterations since then, so I don't know in which status is now (I'm waiting for the Mig to get fixed in order to come back), but the fact that they change the FM drastically each time is not a good signal. Maybe somebody can shred some light on it. Regards

That sounds messy... :D Regards

IMO at the top is ED/Belsimtek modules, although the rest are not doing bad these days. I keep my hopes high on M3, and I feel they will eventually fix the mess, but please understand the disappointing from the part of the community who don't want just an aircraft that "feels like" real, but that it behaves and operates like the real thing. Regards

Sorry, but exactly how is synthetic runways enabled in the real aircraft? Is the runway information introduced in the INS? or it's automatically built from ILS signals? Regards!

What about the unrealistic behavior of the SPO-10? The ASP providing bombing solutions with the radar-off? Simplified navigation with an unrealistically modeled ARK-9/10? No real ground returns when radar pointing downwards? Small nuances as well? Of course there are different levels of realism, each of them valid for different kind of public. But as Vicent says, don't try to sell the product as an "study sim" then, it's misleading and directly false. Regards

Well it's not only about locating town/cities, but also to locate buildings around a runway for targeting, for example, or so others many uses that a 70's tech AG radar can have in "terra firma". I hope they eventually find out, it has tactical relevance. Regards

Honestly as I see this, if they declare and go for an early A version and all features are realistic within this context, then FINE. What I hate is when several versions are mixed together with "playability concessions" and undeveloped features. But it's not the case this time. Yep that's a pity. Some people buys the Mirage 2000 and would have preferred the mud moving -5, so what? They are transparent with the version they are modeling and delivers what's promised, fair game. Regards

Question, did the A-7 suffer the same painful engine problems as the F-14A, since they both share power plant? Regards

Cobra has spoken! :) Regards

https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3085567&postcount=16 https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3086812&postcount=20 https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=142375 https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=2691071&postcount=22 etc, etc... Regards

I think DL fells more in the ED side, since some kind of standard protocol is needed so players and IA can share information during SP and MP flights, regardless the module they're flying. A-10C (the state it's right now) is far from offer complete Link-16 capabilities, so it's not the best example. But I agree, as more and more advance a/c are joining in the game, ED needs to put in place the proper bricks for the future. Regards

Honestly I don't understand why people keep saying that the Mig-21 is one of the most realistic a/c in DCS, when right now it's flawed in almost every area, from FM to weapon system, from Navigation to Starcode activation. It's a fun aircraft to fly, but I really hope M3 straighten it up and bring the realism level it deserves Regards

My heart beat rate skyrocketed at reading "Mig-29 AFM" in the title. Please be more careful naming your posts. Heart health is not joke. Regards

I do. Charging for the upgrade, of course :music_whistling: Regards

Really? I don't have NTTR installed, but I've been told that it's not the case, buildings are still missing from radar scope. It can happen though that what you see is the terrain-type change under towns or cities, but not the buildings themselves. Regards

Just checking, are there plans to make them visible in the radar scope at some point down the road? Yeah, I know the Viggen is not an interdiction a/c, but since it's the only sensor installed, being unable to at least detect town and cities is quite annoying. Regards!

Well the image needs to be half transparent, but it's an start! Regards

Who knows, but don't expect it soon. Regards

Good catch! Regards

Sorry for destroying wet dreams here, but I think Chizh statement is only Flight Model related. Regards

Has this been fixed? Regards!

Good catch!

It's a real M2000C wishlist actually , so I guess they should write on Dassault's forums instead. Regards