JUICE-AWG

I get this sometimes when I alt tab to a different monitor while loading or if I bring up FaceTrackNOIR to launch it...and occasionally, I get the music like it's on the main menu but it's black screen. If I leave the keyboard alone, no problems.

Go with POINT CONTROL for hand tracking in the cockpit..

You are correct, confirmed...thanks, didn't look at that function...and with that, the way the system is equals all is well.

Still, default should be single and the pilot should program "UP" the quantity needed to mitigate various threats. Having it on one still allows the pilot to engage the CMS command multiple times as needed or once with a programmed quantity. Having default of 10 means you get 6 engagements of C/M.

Thank you TerraFinale! To all, let's keep DCS a realistic as possible sim first and in default settings, and make any arcade functions an option at best...Cheers!

At 56, I notice the same, normal cockpit in GA airplanes is fine without lenses, but in DCS If I lean in for FaceTrackNOIR, I get to grab my reading glasses...I did notice a difference in the cockpits of fair to excellent improvement when going from TF-51D to P-51D-25-NA to P-51D-30-NA with the latter being the best resolution...I have my settings on 512 in the cockpit with a 1440p/144Hz monitor set to G-Sync and a 1080Ti SC Black Edition GPU driving it...might bump the cockpit up to 1024 and see how that does for me.

So the fix is not large object size settings but "realistic object size settings" because bringing back the big object size settings from the past is unrealistic as get all! If this setting is coming back, it should be the exception, not the norm.

I know there is a QF-4 Drone MOD, but wouldn't it be nice if in our AI Aircraft mix, we could get an unarmed QF-4 Drone without a pilot in the cockpit and without the ability to launch offensive weapons? :pilotfly:

I think the cost will be manageable if ED keeps the price reasonable and considers tying in incentives for people who already own carrier-based Advanced/Professional Flight Models such as the Tomcat or the Hornet. These customers could get a discounted price for the module, but again, if the price is nominal and aimed at everyone jumping on board, more units sold is more profit/development costs. I say price it well within reach of most flyers and more people sign up for a Supercarrier Cruise!

I think the message is can we have a Full Fidelity F-15C as a standalone DCS Module...+1 Quote: Originally Posted by zhukov032186 Because it isn't just ''clickable'' they actually model the systems behind it, a process that usually takes a year or two (or more). So no, it's not going to happen. It is possible someday they will make a full fidelity F-15C, in which case it would be a completely separate, $80 module like the F-16. That's why the FC3 aircraft are cheap, and the others are not, because FC3 utilises a lot of extremely simplified, ''gamey'' systems, and the fully modeled aircraft do not (generally). It's also why FC3 aircraft have pamphlet manuals, and the others are hundreds of pages long. If a Dev Team decides to make an F-15E Strike Eagle, then the complete module could be the "Eagle: F-15C/F-15E" and sold as one package since making the front cockpit model of the Strike Eagle, you have about 80% of the Single Seat C-Model done...so the question is "how can we make this a reality!" Quote: Originally Posted by Oceandar Yeah I agree. Shouldnt be much works as hornet and Viper I guess. Just one more and we have all complete HiFi teen aircrafts in DCS. Totally agree with you...the aircraft physical model is pretty much done, the cockpit model is there, and the learning curve is shallower as the successes of the Hornet and Viper are gains in future module development. If you build it, we will fly it!

Is there any way to reprogram the custom kneeboard folder in the saved games so we can also have certain charts and such show up "by Terrain. Being able to put NTTR specific info in a folder for the map could be great. Putting it into all of the aircraft folders makes it show up on all the maps... https://steamuserimages-a.akamaihd.net/ugc/790878846612079633/D801973E9E1A510448D18F9398F1A617017B83E7/ Please let me know if this is already possible. Keep up the great work ED! =JUICE=

My system does this too sometimes when loading a map or even when booting the program and it's only if I alt tab to another monitor to bring up Discord or Head Tracking or something. This only started happening about 2 - 3 updates ago...for now, try just letting it load without multi-tasking the keyboard and see if it works!

If Priced Right, we could get the WWII Pacific Assets Pack w/usable carriers...and redesignate the current Assets as WWII Europe...opens up expansion for a WWII North Africa Assets Pack as well in the future.

The Greenland/UK Gap Map would be great! Keflavik, Reykyavik, Farro Islands, Jan Mayen, and Northern Scotland!

No Makee Sensee!

Why a DCS Channel Map when we already have the Normandy Map that covers almost the exact same area???

And being easy to model ocean (most of the map) is a bonus for development ease.

Maybe we can get a Bundle Deal on the Marianas Island Map and Super Carrier...say, Free and Free?

@Jafergon and JackJack171, are you guys sure they are use all the time...even during cats and traps? How does that effect the pilots' natural night vision?

Totally, Perhaps either through F# menus or setup in the editor.

Is there any way to set the default CMS quantity to 1 each without having to program it in the jet? Prep on the ground for regular missions is fine, but for PvP Dogfight start in the air it's impractical. Just asking for ideas or a consideration to set the default in the jet to 1. What's the real Viper settings have in regard to this?

As Kylander said, "You have your Grognards and your Funseekers." This would be great for the Grognards and the Funseekers would owe a bunch of money!

My hardest is the HUEY...wants to stay high, stay high, stay high, then the bottom drops out...

Maybe that glue-down event can be moved to a different parameter, but finding what makes sense instead of other problems is the challenge I'm sure.

Thanks for the INTEL!