BarTzi

You can change the GAIN level for the air to ground radar in MAP mode, but can't do the same while using GMT with INTL boxed. gmt gain intl.trk

wilbur81, even if we wanted to help- the attached pic provides almost zero information. The F10 view doesn't really help us understand what was going on. You should provide an F10 view when the missile go active. then we could (sort of) try and figure out what went wrong.

It can intercept other misiles \ glide bombs, as can some other types of sam batteries.

Not implemented yet.

There's no need for it, unless you are willing to pay for a Finnish version. They will make a digital UFC when they decide to model the Super Hornet.

What are we even talking about? This is what you said: "under the current setup, multiplayer is only with individual pilots leading their own solo flights". This is entirely wrong. You can setup a flight of multiple clients as a group of up to four aircraft. You can also set the lead of that flight to be AI, and the rest as playable slots ('client'). This is done via the mission editor. If you fly a mission that is made of individual pilots leading their own groups, it means that the mission maker CHOSE to set it up that way, not that this is a DCS limitation. However, the thread you linked leads to a completely different topic: having the ability to manually set up groups after the mission has started, like in the A10C. It's a different thing entirely, and obviously - a welcome addition.

Shouldn't it have like 10NM visibility anyways?

What do you mean? You can have a human wingman (it's been like that since forever). Each group of planes in DCS can have up to four members, and all of them can be flown by human pilots. The mission maker might change it so that some groups have only one member in them. In that case, you won't be able to have a wingman that appears in the S\A page as a part of your flight.

That's not correct. They only go solo if the mission maker set it up as a one plane section. I second your request to set up your own section/pair after the mission has started, like the A10C.

Nothing misleading in my opinion. Which part isn't true? there are vapor effects, and there weren't before the Hornet was released.

This statement is true. New effects were indeed developed for the Hornet. It was the first aircraft in DCS to feature over wing vapor and rain over canopy. It does not say they developed new effects to replace the ones we currently heve.

Anything Israeli (and modern) is a no-go for DCS. Israeli aircraft are heavily modified inside and out, and no information is publicly available to simulate in detail (even cockpit shots are OPSEC). The closest thing is a stock US made aircraft with an Israeli livery. It would be more reasonable to have Israeli assets as AI, with Python acting like Aim-9X, and Spice acting like JDAM.

MIDS messeges are just a number of pre set messeges in the legacy, and it has no keyboard of any kind, so you won't be able to type any. Those pages are blank because ED probably doesn't have a valid source describing the functionality of those systems. If they have no idea what it does, I think they should not try to guess.

Then stop watching the videos if it bothers you. Not everything they show is guaranteed for the next patch. You've been here more than a minute - you should know that.

Show it then. Because they simply iterate over every available target in the area - that doesn't have anything do to with D\L.

They have SME's to fill in the holes in the documentation especially for that. I can name a few instances in which such SME's were very helpful in fixing some bugs \ issues.

Apperantly they do not have a lot of available sources to work with, as they got the type of target lines wrong. Saying "ED should have this documentation" is like saying "I don't have any valid document". It doesn't because it has to be coded, and you don't know that ability was coded in. Who said this capability of the AI to know who is targeting what, is not limited to a section of aircraft? You are implying a handoff (AI aircraft sending a target to another AI aircraft). That never happened in the video. They happen to end up attacking the same target. They could have just launched an AGM-65F at their first pair, and then targeted the remaining targets in the area, which happened to be the one targeted by the AI flying with Wags.

If you have the documentation, send it to the development team. That could help everyone. You said they know how to automatically slave their sensors to shared target points, which is not what they are doing.

I'm suspecting he doesn't let the ground crew finish rearming him, and takes off with an extreme assymetric load each and every time.

If this is based on real documents rather than opinions, send it to the team. As for the AI - it uses a standard logic that has nothing to do with D\L

When I say "The Hornet", I mean the DCS version. We can't slave sensors to a ground target shared by someone else, as it seems.

You can't snap to a D\L target in the Hornet. The AI doesn't use some magic code to do it. It uses the same old targeting logic to avoid conflicting with their wingman \ lead only (it just went to the next available target, which happened to be targeted by the wingman of Wags). You are more than welcome to prove me wrong when the patch is out.

You can't tell that from the video. It's more likely that they have absolutely no idea who is targeting what, and accidentally target the same objects.

That's not accurate.. just post the track.

Would not be a sim otherwise.