draconus

This is correct. 13900 has 8 P-cores and 16 E-cores. https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/sku/230497/intel-core-i913900kf-processor-36m-cache-up-to-5-80-ghz/specifications.html

You can hear them in DCS but only for AI aircraft.

Neither does the Tomcat unless you do crazy stuff no sane pilot would do IRL. Not one track was posted here but it's usually speeding with parking brake on.

It's usually a few months.

No ETAs.

I thought waiting for Vulkan myth was already debunked as this was about MT instead.

Until HB and their SMEs confirm your revelations it's your technique that's wrong.

You're right: https://www.navysite.de/cvn/cv43deploy.htm but what difference does it make for the ship if it's exercise or deployment?

Yes, there's this risk. Either accepct the module as is now or wait until it is satisfactory for you.

DCS options > gameplay tab > g-effects

I asked legit questions - can I get devs' answers?

I have run the QAG once and I don't get it. It started with my last used PG map. I set my action options and clicked Generate. It then moved my starting and enemy postitions to completely different place on PG map, only then I was able to click Save and play. It lacks options and I find it harder than ME to use. Of course assuming knowing ME already.

For sure you can come up with a lot of ideas for Red Flag or Aggressors training campaign, either fictional or fully realistic for NTTR.

It may be - CPU gets too hot (you have to check it) and starts to throttle back, lowering performance, thus causing the CPU to be the bottleneck and GPU waiting for the CPU, thus lowering its usage.

No. I suggest to make some measurable tests before posting revelations. If you find something fishy post a short track. There are many reasons Jester (or rather radar) won't show the target like wrong antenna coverage set, too small doppler shift, hiding in ground clutter, inappropriate search mode, too small RCS, etc. Also check DDD when you think it should show up on TID. May be there but not enough to build a track, etc. Give us a case.

Unrealistic. It is placed on your lap, so see-through (which itself is unrealistic) will get you watching your leg.

For what? To see your leg?

Thanks again for testing. Got the single mission working but I have not tested whole mission, just up to the point when action starts - should be fine after that. https://limewire.com/d/NiRkj#i2GASF5iyz

https://heatblur.se/F-14Manual/cockpit.html#throttle Use #5 Exterior light switch.

What's confusing? In the editor you have an arrow and "blows to dir". In the briefing there are 2 values for everyone's pleasure - one "blows to direction" and the other - "meteo" as "blows from".

Doesn't mean it can be fictional. ED removed many past features of DCS or their FC modules to make them more realistic, not less. It doesn't look like they want to add more FC birds either, apart from modifying already made FF modules like they did for FC 2024. If it's a mod - it's not official by definition - it's game modification. Let it stay out of the game for good reasons. I'd wholeheartedly support a wish for full fidelity modules like Su-24 or MiG-27 though

Yes, please, frequently wished for.

Can we change the thread title to something like "High CPU usage in main menu/ME after update to 2.9.16.10523"? CPU temperature is none of DCS concerns. It's on the user to keep their CPUs cool and safe enough even with full CPU usage. And it can't be idle either since it gets hot.

"Would you like to discuss it with the Hutts? I'm sure they can settle this." From the OP and first page of this thread: