draconus

That depends on the module's radar implementation. Afaik F-15E and M-2000C have aspect-based RCS implemented. Idk about stores' RCS or roll angle dependance.

If the whole wiki article won't help you nothing will. The main point is that video game is a computer program that lets you play and have fun using the computer, input and display devices. And the other take away is that simulation is subgenre of video games. That's all to it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_game

Please, upload your \saved games\dcs\logs\dcs.log from your last crash.

Not my experience. I always fly with random failures set to on and failures are very rare.

Are you already maxing Q3 out - high PD and top WiFi/cable? Because the card only allows for better performance if your older one was lacking and maybe cover some cases where new card supports better video codec. You can still try max settings on your current card and see if it still lets you play or is your CPU the bottleneck. Also for DDIs make sure you have already set "Res. of cockpit displays" in DCS options to 1024. What AA settings are you using? Any DLSS will worsen the quality. Use DLAA instead and add some sharpening to it. N/A to MSAA, which is good quality but shimmering a lot. For sure 5080 will help with your new Crystal HMD. Sub is here: https://forum.dcs.world/forum/302-virtual-reality/

Relax, we hear it for 7 years now.

I'm trying to help end your frustration, for free, and you're welcome. It's not a game's fault that some mission creator puts USN aircraft vs USAF.

Change the server then.

It's not a given or expected that DCS running Vulkan will have to ditch Razbam modules, unless you have some internal info on how SDK works. Displaying 3D cockpit and models is gfx engine's job. No need to change all models or textures in the process. And "soon" is also very speculative.

No, we don't get 9.13. Wrong game, pal? I'm sure you'll find mods for R-77 days after release.

Your cat is set by your spawn/parking spot. After landing, yes, one after one.

Trim speed should be modeled as closely as in RL aircraft, not something to configure, unless the RL aircraft has such feature. Also it's common mistake to think that trimming can get you hands-free prolonged perfectly level flight.

90% work for 20% price is not very smart. They still need public docs, licenses and government cooperation. Yes, they added some birds with FC2024 but they already had most of the work done as FF modules.

That ED have not overhauled their deck system is understandable but for the mission creator to not fix his mission is just lazy. Solution in first reply.

I don't know what you found funny. My question is also serious. I expect to have my SE working beyond 2.9, whatever version it is. If you don't fly the Mudhen and can grab other module instead for free, by all means, it's a reasonable decission. But I do like and use the F-15E so I refuse to give it away. It's not like they have something better in store.

Yeah, why 2.9? What about 2.10?

I confirm, all static F-14A/B have no TCS on chins. It'd be nice to have an option for this or add that model as F-14A-90-GR.

You'd have to test "DCS_updater.exe update 2.5.3.24984@release" command (but I refuse to test it on my DCS) to see if it will downgrade current DCS installation. For MP to work with friends all servers and clients would need to be on the same version. Even if you can install 2.5.3 and fly the Hawk there won't be flyable Strike Eagle or any modules and maps released after 2.5.3. For SE you have to use at least 2.8.6 or later.

No, these are mesh related And no, not normal. RL airfield is uneven but in a smooth long way not like sudden bump that make aircraft jump instantly or break the gear.

Yes, same request for ground missile launches.

In 1998 they'd rather sell it as a new game in the software store and you'd have to buy a box of dozens of DVDs.

That would be "scan zone up/down". This is the subforum for F-15C: https://forum.dcs.world/forum/249-f-15c-for-dcs-world/

Cannot reproduce in current Edge, Chrome nor Firefox, all tested in private/incognito mode, not logged in.