Jump to content

Cdodders

Members
  • Posts

    226
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Cdodders

  1. True, however being able to drive through the wall like it's not there at all is also an issue
  2. The JF-17 can do it, as well as creating markpoints for GPS targets and waypoints. Can't see a reason why it cannot be added for the F-16 and F/A-18
  3. The Wall itself can be driven through as if it is not there, which tells me it's also not a destructible object? Also the The Iron Cross standard above the quadriga on the Brandenburg Gate was replaced by a wreath, as originally intended, but the Iron Cross returned after Reunification. Here, it is depicted in DCS with the Iron Cross. Which is not in keeping with the time depicted.
  4. Given that the map covers both Berlin and Sennelager Training Area, would the two-tone UK camo for the Chieftain, the Berlin Brigade Camo for UK vehicles, and also Wolfgang's Bratty Wagon be implemented?
  5. nullJust downloaded, getting texture issues
  6. Will this come with Tallboy?
  7. PFA Track file Set up a basic firing test of the Invincible Carrier vs. a Tu-22M with 3x KH-22. Sea Dart consistently flies close by without initiating proxy fuze and will do this no matter how many times I reload the scenario. Image from 2nd track file Vince2.trk Vince.trk
  8. Trying to place RP waypoints for the JF-17 Cruise Missile for a MP session, however the square box that I usually use (mainly for SP) isn't there for a Client jet, will the Nav Target Points still work for the purposes of targeting the cruise missile?
  9. Does this pass IC?
  10. Will the CRV-7 rocket pod make an appearance on the Apache?
  11. Is anyone else having difficulty with launching the F-4B from a Carrier? I even used the SuperCarrier and it was struggling to stay airborne after launch. I had full burner, half flaps and raised gear as soon as I cleared the deck and still sank to almost kissing the water, holding it at almost stalling out to get it to climb
  12. You already know what carrier I would like!
  13. Did you remember to switch on the laser?
  14. I did a little testing, and LAR is needed for it to pick up a Burke
  15. I would like the FG.1
  16. What about a Burke?
  17. The current name is not really a well thought out one, it's misleading at best and somewhat confusing, especially for new players getting to grips with the controls. I suggest it is renamed to something more accurately descriptive to what function it performs. such as 'Stabiliser'.
  18. YES PLEASE
  19. That would seem reasonable, although I suspect the addition of some USN variants and maybe another foreign user variant would also be reasonable.
×
×
  • Create New...