Cab

Yes to both questions.

So, you think they should delay the launch entirely until functionality you deem essential is added. But you don't consider it so essential that it will prevent you from buying the module as-is. Go figure.

Not an excuse, just a reality. The only alternative would be for Razbam to delay the launch of the F-15E, which is absolutely not necessary. Also, as many people have already stated, the requirement for a RIO to fight in the F-4/F-14 does not translate to the Strike Eagle.

Well, it’s only Early Access so you might be happier holding off buying it until the AI WSO is included.

Agreed. But on the other hand, the Navy F-4s have cooler paint schemes and do carrier ops. That makes the CDI factor (Chicks Dig It) off the scales for that jet, so there’s that.

Absolutely. Many people will buy the module for exactly that reason. But the F-4 was only operated by Australia, Greece, Iran, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Spain, West Germany, Great Britain, Turkey, and the United States. I'm confident a whole lot of people from countries not on that list will be buying it too.

That would be 336 hours of free game play, which I don’t think is reasonable. For what you’re asking for I’d say 12 hours total.

With such an overly simplistic statement, it’s impossible to know where to begin.

I saw Bigney write in a YouTube comment that VR and DLSS were working for him.

Bignewy wrote in a YouTube comment that it works for him.

Anyone ask about native support for OpenXR yet?

Apparently ED thought so too.

Ok, thanks. Just curious

On a related note, considering the name you chose for your squadron, do you by any chance fly on the Enigma server as Witch 1-1?

“The F-15E is better at the missions it’s designed to do over the F/A-18C.” Fixed it for you.

The discussion has not been whether or not the Strike Eagle can do air-to-air. No one is disputing that (I think). Rather, we have been arguing about the realism of operating F-15E’s without the CFTs.

Ok, my apologies. Sometimes that doesn't come across in text.

Yes, no one had questioned that. The case before the court was, would a Strike Eagle operator remove the CFTs for missions considering it hadn’t been done previously? If you go back and read my post from June you’ll see what I was replying to.

No, because the CDI factor is off the charts for Navy pilots. (CDI = Chicks Dig It)

Except carrier ops. It sucks at that.

Did they remove the CFT’s? That was the intended reference.

This thread has been a long, winding road for those of us who have stuck with it. I quote myself from June of this year:

Or....maybe the planned changed. Someone being wrong doesn't mean they lied.

"all of my money" I'm not sure how it can be read that way, but we can agree to disagree.

Out of curiosity I checked Facebook for last year's video and found no pre-announcement like this year. Makes me wonder if ED is excited about what's coming. But in reality, it probably doesn't mean anything.