ngreenaway

I love it too, it's a 120 gal reef tank (with an additional 80 gal sump) Here's a better pic: (I've got a very nice frogspawn that I've grown from a tiny frag in the algae covered "jail" cuz I had a fish at the time that was making a meal out of it) Another pic inside the tank: Also, a 125 gal discus tank in the dining room And my wife's round 90

Could you plot that out on Google maps to give a better idea of what the map entails?

That happens sometimes. I noticed some functions have different names from one airframe to another (I think there's one where landing gear was labelled "undercarriage", for example. I can't remember which tho) I've taken to relying on search function rather than scrolling through the lists

Fixed it for ya. Doesn't matter if it's an easy start, OP was looking to autostart. Those of us who do have our own reasons, and "do a manual start " isn't the answer for some of us. It may be easy-ish if you tend to fly one or a few airframes, if you fly a lot -or all of them- then memorizing the start procedures for each isn't likely to happen. Especially if outside responsibilities &interests keep you from practicing these perishable skills as much as you'd like Checklists are all well & good except when flying vr and can't readily access your notes. Gimme autostart any day of the week& twice on Sundays, I have no interest in doing manual starts

I feel your pain. I only use autostarts for that reason

I certainly hope not,

just one more reason to drop steam and go standalone

Meh, this does nothing for me. I prefer the current UI and on the hierarchy of things needing attention or changing, the UI is real low on the totem pole

I'm gonna have to try that.... I noticed last time I was flying, I was getting quite a bit of black flickering in vr using current stable build. I haven't seen that in any other aircraft, and haven't gone back to see if it's a one time thing, or if I'm gonna have to live with it for the time being

Barbie Larpers? That's a new one to me

I just put this together. There's not a lot to it, but I fly in VR only, so simpler is better. Slides out of the way next to one of my aquariums when I'm not using it:

ive had no vr issues either. this sounds like run-of-the-mill hyperbole

I see little value in it. For the majority who fly in SP, it's irrelevant. It may be fun for the MP crowd, but I question the realism. IRL, I don't think helmet customization is that common. I'm sure it may be in us navy, and I have a bunch to a lesser extent us air force and even less so in US army aviation....I keep saying us because I don't seem to remember seeing gaudy customized paint jobs on the helmets of rank&file pilots of other nations' flying branches While it may be fun for some, I don't think it brings much to the table & I certainly wouldn't regard it as a "very important feature", but to each their own

Don't hold ur breath. Bo105 completion status: Fragger has to do what pays the bills, and right now, that's the Typhoon. Raz is signed on to assist with coding, but they add a new model they're working on every week. It all looks wonderful, and I wish them (and Fragger ) all the success in the world, but a module in the store is worth more than 10 in the pipeline, and razbams pipeline just keeps growing

par for the course for jasonbirder. really, i had hoped he would be happy when he jumped to OB, looks like thats not the case

Problem with this poll is what question posted was what version would we all like to see assumes that there's even a consensus of interest in this series in the first place. Should be a button to vote "none"

I think the l-39 has a lot going for it. It's already a tried& true module . It's mature, no longer going thru the growing pains of a new module, which makes it good for introducing to new players. Hawk would be nice, but given limited resources to develop new aircraft, I'd say there's higher priorities for the community than yet another trainer aircraft I have less than zero interest in bringing in yet *another* carrier aircraft If I had a pick of what would be best suited for new players, it would be to make the a-4 community mod official and have it take the place of the su-25. It's full clicky, it's mild mannered, has plenty of systems to manage without becoming overwhelming for new players. For those who care, it can be used with a carrier. Unlike the l-39, it can be used for AAR But regardless of which way the poll goes , EDs gonna do what they're gonna do With that being said, if it gives new players a better experience than the su-25, I don't care if they get an aircraft free that I already paid for )shrug(

please dont get my hopes up

id be happier with an A model rather than a D

Theyve already blown it up before , "proving" that they can take on the real thing. It would seem theyve rebuilt it

im that way too, ive got almost $55 in points, the syria map coulda been free but im holding out for the hind steam users are really missing out with those points!! im really hyped about this map, israel is at the top of the short list of places id like to retire to . this will really give a lot of relevancy to a lot of modules (even some of the warbirds!) but especially for the f16 (i know its wrong variant for IAF, dont care) also, with the ah-6 mod, embassy storming could be fun :)

i think it would be nice if dcs would randomly change themes, like a desktop slideshow

Would go great in the Hormuz map. I imagine the deck is sturdy enough for a yak-52 or a CE2 to land on

Would go great in the Hormuz map. I imagine the deck is sturdy enough for a yak-52 or a CE2 to land on

There, that's better. Fixed it for you