Oceandar

Yeah...I wish we can fight each other in 104th server like old time. Right now the server mostly empty (in my timezone). I would play on 104th if I could see quite lot of players. I'm not a good pilot on 1 vs 1 and need others to become a bait lol.

For early acces with quite alot of guesses I'd only willing to pay 60 bucks tbh. Generally I'm ok with avionic assumptions. Look at what RB did with M2K. They did quite alot of wrong avionic implementations in M2K which they fixed it with the help of French Air Foce later on. Most average players like me wouldnt know the real thing anyway. So... bring it on.

How about Blue Flag PvP server (highly recommended) You can also try Growling Sidewinder server (PvP) but its suffering high packet loss and lags recently (at least on me). Basically its an airquake server. Fly, shoot and land. No AG mission that I know. Its rarely rotate its mission and its bored me to be honest. BTW fighting AI can be fun. I like flying in hoggit servers in all available modern theater from Caucasus, PG and Syria (80 era). Missions are great, nice people and active SRS. Highly recommended to try.

I just based my oppinion on what I've seen and experience and I've asked many players online about this and they also agree with me. If it works for you then good for you. I also read on this forum that real life F-18 pilots dont use it that much because ofc they need to VID the target based on ROE something AG radar can not provide. If you think you can provide a tutorial (I prefer a video) about how to use hornet AG (map mode) properly to find a tank in the ouskirt of a town for example, please do so. Thanks in advance.

Done.

Yes please ED. I cant express myself enough how annoying this problem is (I'm using 6 DOF Trackir)

* ED's two main criteria for choosing their next module: 1. Profitability (first and foremost) 2. Documentation. Above quote from an interview with Andrey Chizh.

After what we have in Hornet and Jeff AG radar (map mode) I'm not that enthusiastic about this function. In hornet its almost useless, its only good for ship and moving ground target track. I cant believe we're waiting so long for this to be implemented only to find how useless this is. Well I hope you're right Kev for the F-15E, at least as good as your gif pict.

ED will prioritize a project that will give them more profit IMO. Now which one will give more profit between Mosquito and Apache ?

Realistic. There's a thread/post about this somewhere in this forum and you can search for it.

Interesting. You should make separate thread about this to get ED attention.

I think ED should really consider this

I'm hoping for hornet radar tuning for little bit sharper. Right now its kinda problematic to use particularly in tws.

I observed via tacview some of high scored pilot tactic in MP. They mostly cirle around not far from SAM coverage near airbase. Fly high.... lob some Phoenixs.... extend and defending with SAM support and repeat.....pretty boring IMO.

Lol... I'm with you Mower. I finally ended up buying TM Warthog (availabe here in my local shop) not to mention the cost of shipping plus tax to my country which almost half of the price of the joystick. Probably worth it for some of you tho.

I agree DCS should support DLSS but thats because I have NVIDIA card lol. Why dont one of you guys make a poll. It could probably get ED attention.

I just enabled resizable bar on my 3060 ti and I think I've got nice improvement and much more fluid. Gained 5 - 7 fps more but I also noticed higher CPU load from 20 to 23 % ? Cant complain.... it was like free upgrade anyway. R5 3600, RTX 3060 Ti, MSI 550M Bazooka. RAM 32Gb 3200 Mhz. Latest Win10, Bios and driver, DCS Open Beta. Flat Screen.

I personally curious how EOS and IR missiles would perform in DCS after ED make weather and clouds interfering with EOS and IR sensor.

I agree. I also hope ED would take a look on tws auto. The elevation most of time way off. This is just sad compared to Viper radar which it like having an AESA radar lol.

As long as this thread tagged as "no evidence" this thread is going nowhere.

Apart from against blinking ECM and wingtip bug in F-16 I'm ok with it

Sarcasm is appreciated. I was talking about the post above me 8 vs 8 instant action mission. Without a track or tacview we can only make a guess. I understand amraam has some issues but its performance is acceptable IMO.

Its against AI isnt it? AI has set of skill to do notch perfectly so I wouldnt be surprised. The AI also has a habit to shoot missile at almost max range so I don't think its 120 issue specifically. AI tactics has a pattern and you just need to observe it to defeat it IMO.

I even tried TWS and he immediately takes evasive maneuvers even though he shouldn't be getting a locked signal I can confirm this. Distance doesnt matter. AI always immediately turn if it get shot at.

Around 30 - 50 miles you should be able to detect the bandit. Check your PRF setting and elevation.