purpi Posted November 9, 2019 Posted November 9, 2019 I can't find anything related to the advance of the A/G radar anywhere, there are no images or comments about the state of this system by the developers and it has been a long time to not offer users any related information. :book: It seems very strange to me and makes me think that there must be some reason for incompatibility because of the ground mesh, it is known that they are working on a new terrain engine and this could be the problem with the A/G radar
Svsmokey Posted November 9, 2019 Posted November 9, 2019 It's not even on the..er..radar https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=4069345&postcount=219 9700k @ stock , Aorus Pro Z390 wifi , 32gb 3200 mhz CL16 , 1tb EVO 970 , MSI RX 6800XT Gaming X TRIO , Seasonic Prime 850w Gold , Coolermaster H500m , Noctua NH-D15S , CH Pro throttle and T50CM2/WarBrD base on Foxxmounts , CH pedals , Reverb G2v2
Weta43 Posted November 11, 2019 Posted November 11, 2019 If you use the search, & look a couple of years ago, there were images posted of ground radar images generated from DCS. Cheers.
kaoqumba Posted November 11, 2019 Posted November 11, 2019 https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=4041541&postcount=463 In 2019, don't expect to see any progress
QuiGon Posted November 11, 2019 Posted November 11, 2019 There's a WIP picture of the DCS ground mapping radar in this newsletter: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=2386306#post2386306 Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!
draconus Posted November 11, 2019 Posted November 11, 2019 What about the one in the Viggen? Win10 i7-10700KF 32GB RTX4070S Quest 3 T16000M VPC CDT-VMAX TFRP FC3 F-14A/B F-15E CA SC NTTR PG Syria
Silver_Dragon Posted November 11, 2019 Posted November 11, 2019 Has builded by Heatblur and not use the actual A/G API in progress by ED. For Work/Gaming: 28" Philips 246E Monitor - Ryzen 7 1800X - 32 GB DDR4 - nVidia RTX1080 - SSD 860 EVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 2 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Warthog / TPR / MDF
Harlikwin Posted November 11, 2019 Posted November 11, 2019 What about the one in the Viggen? Its their own A/G radar code. Deka has some A/G radar modeling too. I think ED is building a generalizable system for their models and 3rd party use. New hotness: I7 9700k 4.8ghz, 32gb ddr4, 2080ti, :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, HP Reverb (formermly CV1) Old-N-busted: i7 4720HQ ~3.5GHZ, +32GB DDR3 + Nvidia GTX980m (4GB VRAM) :joystick: TM Warthog. TrackIR, Rift CV1 (yes really).
ebabil Posted November 11, 2019 Posted November 11, 2019 can these planes carry sar radars? it looks incredibly beautiful FC3 | UH-1 | Mi-8 | A-10C II | F/A-18 | Ka-50 III | F-14 | F-16 | AH-64 | Mi-24 | F-5 | F-15E| F-4| Tornado Persian Gulf | Nevada | Syria | NS-430 | Supercarrier // Wishlist: CH-53 | UH-60 Youtube MS FFB2 - TM Warthog - CH Pro Pedals - Trackir 5
kaoqumba Posted November 12, 2019 Posted November 12, 2019 can these planes carry sar radars? it looks incredibly beautiful In the foreseeable future, only f / a18c and F15E have SAR function in all released, completed and planned modules
AeriaGloria Posted November 12, 2019 Posted November 12, 2019 Shouldn’t the JF-17 have SAR? I thought I had heard that while we will have RBM GMTI and SEA 1/2(as seen in the video), they would have to wait for ED API to introduce DBS and SAR. Do I remember right koaqumba? Black Shark Den Squadron Member: We are open to new recruits, click here to check us out or apply to join! https://blacksharkden.com
kaoqumba Posted November 12, 2019 Posted November 12, 2019 Shouldn’t the JF-17 have SAR? I thought I had heard that while we will have RBM GMTI and SEA 1/2(as seen in the video), they would have to wait for ED API to introduce DBS and SAR. Do I remember right koaqumba? Unfortunately, in the real world, China provides jf17's klj7 radar with a very high precision SAR (expected to reach 2ft)! This is far more than the coming SAR of F / A18 and F15E! But Pakistan is short of money, and their jf17 has removed this function. So, there is no SAR. Only dbs2, 32:1 magnification is of little significance
AeriaGloria Posted November 13, 2019 Posted November 13, 2019 I see. I thought I had heard of someone opting out of SAR. Thank you! Black Shark Den Squadron Member: We are open to new recruits, click here to check us out or apply to join! https://blacksharkden.com
Kang Posted November 13, 2019 Posted November 13, 2019 Unfortunately, in the real world, China provides jf17's klj7 radar with a very high precision SAR (expected to reach 2ft)! This is far more than the coming SAR of F / A18 and F15E! But Pakistan is short of money, and their jf17 has removed this function. So, there is no SAR. Only dbs2, 32:1 magnification is of little significance Makes me wonder, does that work just like anything else bought from China? '2000mAh battery' or '120lm flashlight' or...
Mandellorian Posted December 21, 2019 Posted December 21, 2019 I saw a post ages ago that they were concentrating on the Lightning pod fuctionality as that is used a hell of a lot more in the real world than the ground radar.
DmitriKozlowsky Posted December 22, 2019 Posted December 22, 2019 Is there ISAR in DCS? Is there ISAR in DCS? I have never heard of it in DCS. It would be way too computationally heavy, if implemented realistically. Fly a steady course , speed, and steady alt with 11-15 degree heading offset to the target. ISAR then takes a snapshots with one bursts of beam at high power. Then the computer processes the image for 15-20 seconds, and presents a high resolution image to crew for targeting. Looks like scanning electron microscope but noisier and with lower resolution. Doppler beam sharpening is simpler, and has lower resolution, but is more useful in dynamic combat environment. I do not have F-16 or F/A-18 modules. I am curious how either ISAR or DBS are implemented, if at all.
RustBelt Posted December 22, 2019 Posted December 22, 2019 Well, the simulation engine already KNOWS where everything is, and what its radar reflections looks like. So it wouldn’t be a computational problem like real ISAR, you just make it look and act like ISAR. But right now since all we get from ground returns is clutter noise. None of it is implemented.
Recommended Posts