All Activity

nullnull

Hello Whisky.Actual. Is it possible to keep JAS39 and JF39 installed at the same time? Some time ago, keeping both Mods installed resulted in the Fuel Probe being released on the JF39.

Par for the course. Got all of my hardware in, finished my build today and ran first boot. Solid amber led on mobo debug lights with q code C5. I can't even find code C5 listed in the list of possible codes. smh

The encyclopedia has no bearing on the performance in game. They just posted a medium altitude top speed. It easily can do Mach 4 or more in game. The R-27ER could hit 130 km shots in game except there’s nothing fast enough with big enough RCS for it. Idk maybe if I try against Tu-160. You are basically limited by the lock range of the Su-27 radar, which is 25% less then the detection distance. I’ve hit shots over 120 km with it, which was the furthest I could get a lock on a MiG-31. The TOF was a few seconds less then 60, which proved it could go further and most likely make 130 km. It’s performance will slightly improve with the FF MiG-29 as the current API can’t calculate motor plume drag reduction, and the new API it will be moved to for FF 29 release can do that. But I’ve been told this will mostly help it in rear aspect shots. The encyclopedia has no bearing on what’s in game, it often has incorrect weight and other things. Try the R-27R in game and you will find it hits its charts pretty damn well. With the same set up I used for my 120+ km R-27ER shots. I got 90 km from R-27R. Which is exactly what the MiG-29 manual says is the absolute maximum Theoretical range. You could change encyclopedia to Mach 1 and it would make no difference in game. Also here is a chart of launches at ground level and 10 km alt at Mach 1. Notice it doesn’t reach Mach 3 in either case. That’s why you want to launch closer to Mach 2. Considering charts are for subsonic launch I would say that Mach 3 is a damn reasonable top speed to put in the encyclopedia.

The encyclopedia is not accurate and doesn't reflect what is in the actual LUA files.

I personally probably won't be buying any modules unless they're on sale. I'd much rather wait for a sale and have more modules over the long run then pay full price to have them now. That being said, being able to see all modules currently on sale would probably increase the amount of money I'd spent and make it easier for me to find modules to buy on sale.

Very disappointing, the F-5E on a bomber intercept mission set on all is restricted to only WWII aircraft??? Really Even the dogfight is a funky very limited list of third rate stuff, who wants to bother going up against that garbage? Why isn't there an unlimited mode where I get to choose what I want to fight? This doesn't even make sense.

IDK. In a quick test, my R-27ER went 200km and reached a top speed of roughly M 9.8 (5650 km/hr at 20,500 ft). Obviously, that's not shooting at a target but, then again, what are the actual conditions under which the published numbers are generated?

I haven't released a new version of the Enhancement mod yet. I plan to do that tomorrow. GD just released the new version of the F22 with EFM. Global fix for all FC3 Dependent Mods - Flyable/Drivable Mods for DCS World - ED Forums

What's up with the F-22? I cant fly it.

I have an f-15c but efm mode doesn't work in game I have an f-15c but efm mode doesn't work in game

I'm having this exact same problem.

Just wanted to thank you for this absolutely amazing mod!

Link the EFM v2.0.0 added to first post.

Official download link: https://github.com/grinnellidesigns/f-22a/releases/download/v2.0.0/f-22a.zip

I'll dig up the topic. Has anyone else noticed that there is no signal (green light) for tuning the frequency on the R-828 radio?

Shouldn't the IR beacons activate on the bottom of the CH47 like the others? I do love how the IR formation lights look. That's for sure.

I can replicate that wandering nose at 20 knots, so it's certainly a thing. But is the Apache unflyable, or some of the other overheated rhetoric on this thread? No.

The DxDiag report contains a number of LiveKernelEvent errors with error code 117. This is also indicative of corrupted GPU drivers based on internet references. The DCS log analyzer also had the following to say about the DxDiag report: Windows Error Reporting (WER) Your system crashes with Bluescreens. The following kernel-events have been detected: DPC_WATCHDOG_VIOLATION,VIDEO_TDR_TIMEOUT_DETECTED Remove any overclocking (including XMP)., Run SFC and DISM to check your Windows., Check for any updates of your BIOS or chipset drivers., Application Errors DCS.exe: c0000005 (d3d11.dll) Generic Windows or Hardware Issues Remove any overclocking (including XMP)., Run SFC and DISM to check your Windows., Check for any updates of your BIOS or chipset drivers. For the SFC and DISM references you would need to open a command prompt as administrator and then run the two commands below, these are run separately and then restart your PC. dism /online /cleanup-image /restorehealth sfc /scannow

This error is normally indicative of GPU drivers issue. See https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/support/faq/startup/#3312253 for more info. Use DDU to remove your existing video cared driver and install the latest one. (Installing an older stable 566.36 driver release may also be an option). Drop another log if this is still occurring following on from that. I'd recommend removing your mods as well to ensure you're testing this with a clean base, you can put them back afterwards. This is an interesting error from the logs that repeats for this issue which I haven't seen before, a clean driver may resolve this. I'm assuming that you've made no other changes to other settings in your system, e.g. Nivida Profile Inspector, which could have triggered this? Potentially revert those as well. Failed to NVSDK_NGX_D3D11_EvaluateFeature for DLSS, code = 0xbad00002, info: N Your friend's issues are possibly completely unrelated so they should raise a separate issue and attach their logs and crash log zip to that.

Can confirm I'm also having this problem on my AMD system. Getting 70 plus degrees at idle in the main menu with the current version, vs 40 degrees in the menu with the most recent previous version. If anybody needs it, I had ChatGPT make me a command prompt to revert to the previous version, which I can confirm worked for me: @echo off cd /d "C:\Program Files\Eagle Dynamics\DCS World OpenBeta\bin" DCS_updater.exe update 2.9.15.9599.1@openbeta pause

Indeed, there certainly is a dizzying array of reasons for an Internet connection to be unstable. That was kind of my point. Most of those reasons are not the fault of the customer, but the customer gets punished regardless. Ergo, it's customer-hostile, and an objectionable practice. One usually relegated to megalocorps for whom customer-hostility is a source of pride. Can we do anything about it? Besides complain about it, and registering our objections, I guess not. It's certainly a legitimate thing to complain about, though. And at least for me, it's out of character. Were you to look, I think you would find that my account is filled with nothing but glowing praise for DCS (and the odd admonition for profanity), and I think this is the only thing I've ever complained about. So it's not like I run screaming to the forums every time I find a bug. And your point is taken about offline mode, and I agree that this is a fantastic solution for the psychic among us. Were I psychic, I would absolutely avail myself of it, and I think this would be a reasonable solution. Alas, somewhere along the line, I lost that ability. I think my mother dropped me on my head or something. If one of you could give me a heads up before it goes down, however, I would be much obliged.

OK thanks for your help , It just seemed that all the work witH NV INSPECTOR was for nought