All Activity

Nobrainer. Preordered

nullhttps://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/shop/modules/fulcrum/ Sooo maybe AN/APG-73 on the Hornet can get the passive ranging against jammers as well perhaps????

I didn't see any IRIAF ones, but I'd be shocked if they didn't have some made. And if not, I'll be firing up Photoshop as soon as the templates drop.

invite invalid

I think the community will come up with some. I know I have a couple in mind, a RuAF one I did for the previous FC bird, and a couple fictional versions too.

Is that planned or is it specifically for the F-16? If not then cool, but it would be cool to have a better pod for the Hog.

Трейлер МиГ-29, предзаказ уже доступен:

I think the cause is the opposite... saddly

Here's a quick demo with my current setup. FPS limiter set to 65fps, but the effect is still the same. Behavior is identical with all modules. I'm using some mods in this track to change the trees from high to low and I'm also using reduced texture sizes and don't really have the patience to return to a completely stock install for this test, because the result is the same. SA_frame_drop.trk

From the trailer it looks like all they have now are Polish and Russian skins. Will there be any other Warpac or Middle Eastern liveries?

Hi folks, Selling components of my DCS rig: ASUS ROG STRIX Z790-A Gaming WiFi D4 - bought February 2023 Corsair LPX DD4 3000Mhz 4x16 GB (CMK32GX4M2B3000C15) bought September 2020 Intel Core i7 13700KF - bought October 2023 All in original boxes, full complete sets as bought. Full working condition, excellent DCS results. Asking for €560 for the set or individually CPU - €238/ MB - €259/ RAM - €95

This is an unknown error, if possible you should provide the .trk file, which will help us with further guidance, or read the manual first!

As owner of DIY ffbeast, i agree with Aapje. For that amount of money you can get ffb stick, ffb collective and ffb rudder and have left change. GVL224 from all feedback I seen, they seem very high qualityl.

Thank you!! It was great help for me... When I started the mission, TGP was looking where it needed to be, but after launching, HARM for some reason crawled away and I couldn't get it back. I thought it was a bug.

@Rechs You can get the FFBeast as a full build, and from what I can tell, the support doesn't seem any worse than the Moza and probably also the Brunner. With Brunner the issue seems to be that they focus primarily on civilian airline professionals who tend to fly other sims, and as a result their DCS support seems to be lacking and there is no guarantee that they'll improve. The designer of the FFBeast is from Poland, so I don't see what the issue is with the place of origin. We also have another person building these devices who is Ukrainian (GVL224), but I think that he lives in Germany at the moment. AFAIK there is a higher tariff for Switzerland (Brunner) than for the EU, and the shipping should not be any more expensive. For Americans, getting stuff from Europe should be easier than getting it from China. Note that both of these builders are active on the DCS forum.

Thanks for the helpful responses. My recollection was clearly faulty. Will review cues available on HSD.

This! Turn off civil traffic, SSS, SSAO, SSLR, volumetric lights and cockpit global illumination, set clouds to high and try with no terrain objects shadows, also reduce the number if MSI AB graphs, they all eat CPU cycles.

As far as I am aware Resize Bar is not supported in DCS currently.

Amazing news, thank you so much!

As stated in the title, AI aircraft that are set to "Late Activation" or "Uncontrolled" are unable to perform CAP task. In the attached trk file, "Uncontrolled" aircraft is started using the "Start" task and successfully takes off, but it does not execute the assigned CAP task and simply returns to base. Aircraft that are active from the beginning of the mission perform CAP tasks without any issues. This bug is causing significant problems in mission creation, and I would greatly appreciate it if you could take a look. CAP_Task_TEST_2025-5-16.trk

Let's see, I'm checking the settings in mission 1 and using true north from the map (not in-game magnetic north, which is +5 degrees). On the map you'll see that the carrier has a Z-shaped course. This is because it starts out going up against the wind for departures, heading SW, then turns NE so as not get too far away from the coast (to reduce your commute), and then turn on a SW heading again to its WP3. By the time you return, carrier should be on course for WP3. Yes, the wind is blowing in direction 044 degrees (coming from 224). The carrier has an angled deck of 9 degrees to port side, therefore to get as much of the wind blowing over the deck, the carrier is on course 233 as you say (224-9). The wind is only 11 knots (in some other missions only 5 kts), so you'll still have most of the wind coming from the direction of the carrier. I've linked to this image from Minsky's post dated September 15, 2022.

Flying Alpha Jets out of Fürsty would be quite a treat.

Ugra media has yet not created even one of the major buildings for this Airbase.. hope they skip Phase 2 and 3 until everything looks much more realistic, also the road map on this airbase is kinda off.. again, google maps is your friend to some degree. Same goes for all the other bases so far... work in progress model for the large Main hangars 2, 3, 5, and 6..