All Activity

If US sold an aircraft to Germany, Italy or any other sattelite country - I get it, you fly with what you got. The question was why not build your own military aircraft with cockpits in your language. There is no doubt that English is as important to nato countries militaries as russian in WP, but what speaking has to do with your own instruments And labels? Btw, in FC3 german Bitching Ursula speaks German. Does it speak English IRL?

Всем привет . Хотфикс поломал всё . Илс после переключения сетки остаётся в ночном режиме . переговоры на разрешения запуска рп не отвечает раньше отвечал может у меня только так и ещё при тестирование илс на релизе была другая индикация что то типа проверки вроде мелочь а смотрелось аутентично .Сейчас там какой то квадрат .

That's nonsense. If a military or commercial pilot was not able to speak and understand basic aviation English, he wouldn't belong in a cockpit in the first place. Speaking English in aviation is a matter of professionalism. Exactly. The L-39 cockpit was labelled in Russian for all the other Warsaw Pact nations too, not only for Russia, because Russian was the lingua franca for the Warsaw Pact and the only aviation language there.

This should have been fixed in yesterdays update for the FF MiG-29A. Mind that this is a FC subforum.

It was not 21st inclusion century, especially in the east where people were forced to learn russian anyway and pilots just used what was given to them. So it did not has to be translated, they still had to get to know the aircraft as it was. Even in present times anyone that's smart enough to be given access to the military radio is expected to know english, especially those that have a slightest chance to go abroad for NATO training/meeting or host one.

Syrian MiG29 doing CAS against ISIS forces. The Target area was some 70nm away, and looking at the nice fuelgage, it tells me I have 80nm range.. So a few kg of fuel to blow up stuff then bail out? Luckily once I was a at 25k feet and rolled the throttles down to about 80% and my range shot up for 60nm to around 180. I found the CCIP use very easy, the MiG-29 likes to put warheads to foreheads. The extreme low stamina from stores and fuel is what makes this not a great CAS aircraft. I already have fuel angst in the F-16, the MiG29 is twice as bad. I managed to get 3 attacks out of 2 rocket pods and 2 cluster bombs, as well as some strafing runs. I was only over the battlefield for 10 minutes, and in that time I got several hard kills on armor, infantry and soft skin vehicles, even took out a L39 that ISIS had captured. So she is effective. Just too bad you can’t even select 1 and 1 bomb or 1 and 1 rocket pod.

Syrian MiG29 doing CAS against ISIS forces. The Target area was some 70nm away, and looking at the nice fuelgage, it tells me I have 80nm range.. So a few kg of fuel to blow up stuff then bail out? Luckily once I was a at 25k feet and rolled the throttles down to about 80% and my range shot up for 60nm to around 180. I found the CCIP use very easy, the MiG-29 likes to put warheads to foreheads. The extreme low stamina from stores and fuel is what makes this not a great CAS aircraft. I already have fuel angst in the F-16, the MiG29 is twice as bad. I managed to get 3 attacks out of 2 rocket pods and 2 cluster bombs, as well as some strafing runs. I was only over the battlefield for 10 minutes, and in that time I got several hard kills on armor, infantry and soft skin vehicles, even took out a L39 that ISIS had captured. So she is effective. Just too bad you can’t even select 1 and 1 bomb or 1 and 1 rocket pod.

@MAXsenna I only reinstalled the map through the module manager via the launcher. So fly a mission on afghan and copy the log?

Well, people also use srs instead of discord which is better in every regard so...

It's not theory. They were very open about this that they'll certainly look for more FF redfor jets if the sales are good.

It's a pain having to add the DTC to each individual aircraft in the group if they're using the same DTC. It would be nice if we could load the same DTC to all units in the group like we can with the payload and radio settings.

Can't see any positives in such standardization. It only harms the non-English speaking pilots Actually, it matters. Labels in military aircraft are changed to russian, see the L-39s

Here is a short track if this helps in any way. TrimMiG29A.trk

Thanks for ninja fixing the MiG-29's visor. Now this functionality is ready to be ported over to other ED modules!

I've watched an old amateur video from the cockpit of a Tu-204 in the early 2000s. The pilots had to wear a black apron on top of a white shirt so that it would not be reflected in the screens. There was an NL-10 navigation ruler in the pocket of the commander's chair. Then I thought that they were flying into space with her too. I will definitely buy a Mig-29!

Yeah, requested many times since NTTR addition. This would actually make use of the Master Arm > Training position and all those CATMs.

I have trimmed with the control indicator open last night and on my end neutral trim is reached just as the neutral trim light illuminates when trimming left after the AFCS check. It's right on the edge of the lamp indicator. I trimmed with the indicator as a reference and it looked like I reached roughly neutral trim just before the lamp comes on. I then tapped the trim hat left and the light came on but that already indicates a very slight trim to the left. So if you just go by the aileron neutral light make sure you trim back to the right until the light goes off then tap left again and trim should be roughly neutral. If not you will experience a left roll on take off. https://forum.dcs.world/topic/379459-controller-deadzonecurves-dont-activate-until-mid-flight-uncommanded-left-roll/#findComment-5697886

This is likely unrelated based on your symptoms in comparison to the original post. Can you please raise a new post of your own. Include information indicating which plane, which frequencies, are you tuned to the right freq, are you using the right keybind for the right radio, easy comms on/off etc. The keybind that works for ground crew will be a different keybind than the one you use for your actual radios.

May be Discord ?

In this thread, yes. On the forum in general: no I’ll clarify: when people post anywhere, and others can see a high counter of “community answers” underneath their name, that indicates that person is either helpful, knowledgeable, or both. Look at it as a ‘reputation’ system, that’s visible to everyone regardless of where on these forums they post something

It's perfectly fine to ask ED for additions. However, you need to remember that the Hornet was released in 2018. By now, new features such as the one you asked for won't be added to the jet, at least not for free.

Thank you sir! And have a good game!

Yes, it's a known issue I can't resolve. I have detailed instructions for you on how to stop it. But I'll write to ED about it again. What you need to do:

quite some, on their discord...

Ja, die Bezeichnung „KI Aufgabe Vorwärts“ hat bei mir gar kein Verständnis ausgelöst, leider auch nicht im ME-Handbuch. Darum ist das Beispiel der Mission oben umso hilfreicher, weil man jetzt den praktischen Sinn erkennt! Und statt nur „Höhe“ auch alle möglichen anderen Angaben hin und her switchen kann.