All Activity

What we have in DCS is Magic I with magnesium fluoride seeker window. However, missile performs as same as early Magic I with glass window. If you have magnesium fluoride window, you should get about 90 degrees aspect. If not, 60 degrees. However, in DCS, Magic I had 60 degrees aspect with magnesium fluoride window. This is completely not right. Currently Magic I should be modeled with pure glass. and we probably need a new magnesium fluoride version.

Unfortunately, this is not currently possible at the official level. But it would be great to see a custom mod with this helicopter.

Anything is possible...

what?! please tell us you're being sarcastic here.

What are the odds of C130J coming before the 9.12A?

Since I switched to AMG GPU, I have horrible ghosting issues in DCS, MSFS 2020/2024. using TAA... MSAA is better, but it has less antialiasing... I almost regret my RTX 2070 super OC...

Interesting - ill make a simple mission and post it here as example

take a look page 15. I had the same issue with another preset. Do you have an amd GPU?

Nice to hear it!

Awful!

I got that pattern as well on the very first mission I loaded to check out v 2.0 . Murphy's law an all. Screen below. This is how "Broken cumulus no rain 1" preset looks like when clouds quality is set to "high". What setting do you use on your PC? There seems to be an issue with that single layer only, but it's being used in a couple of other presets as well, isn't it?

Ah, I was wrong about something, the missus will be pleased . Shame about the wind on Sunday, some good as there was enough space to mooch around in, relaxed a bit. That fighter balbo’s getting better every year I think? Ain’t we lucky . Mrs Slippa got a bit choked for a bit there, it does get ya. I know what you mean about the line-up, what to shoot? Spoilt for choice. Years ago I’d have my eye glued to a viewfinder filming the lot but too much of that and you miss just experiencing it all. I do a lot more mooching about and chatting now. I only got a few shots of the balbo this time as Mrs Slippa wandered off with my long lens and I got busy chatting with the fella about the workshop. We’d walked down from the West by the Rapide flights, watched the ground rehearsal for a bit before they went up.

This failed. DCS does not recognize .zip/compressed liveries inside Saved Games/DCS/Liveries/<aircraft name>, the same way liveries are compressed inside DCS<rootfolder>/CoreMods/aircraft/<aircraft name>/Liveries. If there is a way to do it on another folder, I'm not aware.

Great, thanks for your feedback.

I wonder what would happen then if in TP/TP CC/Helm, and you turn on interaction. You lock a friendly. The laser is on so radar STT’s and locks itself. Then, with this friendly l locked with IRST and radar but in a TP mode, you turn on the switch to not lock any friendlies, would it drop lock? Perhaps the system knows the IFF from the radar despite not displaying it?

Someone mentioned before that the Oil cooler shutter control switch and Intercooler shutter control switch are wrong way round. The controls should be in line with each other horizontally but right now, they're crisscrossed. If someone has more information to confirm that would be nice. Same thing can be seen in some pictures and videos of the cockpit like in this one at 09:20. Yes, I know it's a razorback but it should still be the same in other variants as far as I know. I just confirmed that in DCS they are crisscrossed.

What exactly is your point of contention? The 3D model is wrong? Cuz DCS doesn't model windows and Magic 1 uses a cooled PbS based seeker.

OT: I get more likes here combined than the video on YouTube... Anyway, glad you all like it.

Doing something I rarely do, practice! I saw a little photo session on using the HAD to locate SAMs and then use the TPOD, never thought about doing that, as I find HARMs very very boring and almost never use them, I've almost never flown with the HAD. So apparently it has more uses than just firing boring HARMs. Never used the JSOWs either as people keep saying they suck. And they do that indeed. I now almost always run with splash damage script running, the latest versions, not only tune damage from bombs etc., but adds some great looking visual effects too. Though I think you have to "turn on" cluster bomb improvements, which I haven't done. Anyway, ran my little training mission twice, first time, didn't go well, hence the close up of the Buk 11 in one of the pictures, in the second go it went much better, both the SA6 and Buk11 got taken out by JSOW spam, 4 from me and 4 from my wingman. Some launchers still standing, but all radars are gone.

Doing something I rarely do, practice! I saw a little photo session on using the HAD to locate SAMs and then use the TPOD, never thought about doing that, as I find HARMs very very boring and almost never use them, I've almost never flown with the HAD. So apparently it has more uses than just firing boring HARMs. Never used the JSOWs either as people keep saying they suck. And they do that indeed. I now almost always run with splash damage script running, the latest versions, not only tune damage from bombs etc., but adds some great looking visual effects too. Though I think you have to "turn on" cluster bomb improvements, which I haven't done. Anyway, ran my little training mission twice, first time, didn't go well, hence the close up of the Buk 11 in one of the pictures, in the second go it went much better, both the SA6 and Buk11 got taken out by JSOW spam, 4 from me and 4 from my wingman. Some launchers still standing, but all radars are gone.

Am I the only one having this problem and I miss something (I'd like to know what)? @+

Hello ED Team, Three years ago, I reported that the P-51D Mustang pilot model was missing an oxygen mask, which at the time was accepted as a bug. I understand that recently it was mentioned that this issue would be considered more of a “model improvement” rather than a bug. To avoid further confusion for both sides, I would like to confirm: Is this issue still listed under the bug category, or has it been formally reclassified as an improvement? If it is now considered an improvement, is there a public record or tracker where the community can verify its current status? My only goal is to clarify the status of the report and avoid misunderstandings in the future. Thank you for your clarification.

That would be nice. Knowing that they are aware of the issue and looking in for the solution.

Well... Decided to archive the User folder, and uninstall/reinstall DCS 2.9 fresh, down to the desktop icon. Threw out all the folders. Two massive D/L's and ~ 18 hrs. Everything is working properly now and am resetting Options, and then will add back User folders and mods, w/ periodic checks for anomalies. Old install was from 2020? Lots of water under the DCS bridge since. Bowie

ARARK.luanull The above is the example on Syria ARK.luanull The above is on Caucasus - Sorry, the mission is in the night...