Leaderboard

Here is my tutorial....hope it helps, apologize if it isn't great...

Берем стату за НЕДЕЛЮ с ганзо сервера и тупим в нее: США - 9 ников. Англия - 1 Украина - 10 Турция - 1 Словения - 1 Россия - 53 Румыния - 1 Польша - 4 Мексика - 1 Греция - 1 Корея - 1 Казахстан - 2 Япония - 1 Италия - 1 Венгрия - 1 Гонконг (Кетай) - 1 Германия - 7 Франция - 5 Финляндия -1 Ягипт - 1 Дания - 1 Чехия - 2 Неизвестная Кроатиа - 1 Китай - 3 Канада - 2 Беларусь - 1 Азербайджан - 1 Австрия -1 Аргентина - 2

Пакет из 10 миссий не связанных в кампанию. Проходить желательно последовательно начиная с первой. Озвучки нет-внимательно читаем задание и титры в миссиях (брифинги взяты из вложенной в архив книги и к миссиям отношения не имеют, только создают вместе с фото эмоциональный фон). Первоначально это была кампания, но в процессе создания, тестирования и редактирования была поделена мною на отдельные миссии, ибо (по моему мнению) игровой процесс превратился в "погоню за очками" :cheer3nc: чтоб "перескочить" на следующую стадию и "наказание" игрока за "неполучение очков" откатом на начало миссии или вообще на начало кампании... Пусть сам "пилот", а не редактор кампаний определяет исход "полёта"... :worthy: http://files.digitalcombatsimulator.com/ru/22722/

Please use Sysinternals Junction instead as that tool works fine with ModMan. For example. The command.... junction c:\LockOnFC2-MOD\Movies e:\Movies ...creates a Movies folder in the FC2 root folder on my small but fast system disk that really resides on my huge storage disk E. PLEASE READ FIRST FOR MOUNT POINT: If you are using ModMan with your SIM, then adding "Mount Point" will stop ModMan from loading. To load ModMan you need to remove the "Mount Points" again. This is Microsoft’s way to easily solve disk space limits but it has quite a few positive side effects for us gamers. If you for instance want files to be created on a completely other place than the default folder, for example the current limits to change Movies creation place. This technique also works well with the games TEMP folder if you plan to set up a dedicated server. This guide is given without any responsibility from my side whereas your use of it. The description from Microsoft to this feature is: Assign a mount point folder path to a drive Applies To: Windows 7, Windows Server 2008 R2 You can use Disk Management to assign a mount-point folder path (rather than a drive letter) to the drive. Mount-point folder paths are available only on empty folders on basic or dynamic NTFS volumes. Backup Operator or Administrator is the minimum membership required. To assign a mount-point folder path to a drive by using the Windows interface 1. In Disk Manager, right-click the partition or volume where you want to assign the mount-point folder path, and then click Change Drive Letter and Paths. 2.Do one of the following: To assign a mount-point folder path, click Add. Click Mount in the following empty NTFS folder, type the path to an empty folder on an NTFS volume, or click Browse to locate it. To remove the mount-point folder path, click it and then click Remove.* This works with all versions of LOMAC, FC1, FC2 and DCS series. How to create a new Movies mount point: Make sure your “Movies” folder is empty in the DCS A-10C. Find your way to Windows 7 Disk Management. Select one disk (if not empty all the folders will appear in your Movies folder also) Right click the disk where you want to store movies (J: in my example) and select “Change Drive Letter and Paths”. This window should appear: Now click Add and select the “DCSA10C\Movies” folder as a new mount point for the selected disk and click “OK” when done. You should now be able to create files in the “DCSA10C\Movies” that will show up on your other disk. In fact all files created in the DCS Movies folder is created on the other disk :D Enjoy ;) (HJ)

Было бы здорово, чтобы следующим крафтом был какой-нибудь относительно простой в освоении, и имеющий относительно малоэффективное ракетное вооружение истребитель. Ф-16А, Ф-5Е - идеально подходящие для этой роли машины. Это было бы здорово, т.к. такие машины обеспечили бы прекрасную играбельность для сима, лёгкие в освоении, более быстрые в сроках изготовления, а БВБ на них бы был просто сказкой:thumbup: Но ЕД, насколько я понимаю, взяло курс на создание максимально современных машин, типа Ф-16С блок 52 и Ф-18С, похвально, что взялись именно за этот максимально сложный для моделирования тип ЛА, но для играбельности и скорости изготовления крафтов не лучший вариант ИМХО. Чтоб сделать БВБ реалистичным на этих машинах, надо смоделировать радары, РЭБ, АФМ ракет и многое другое. Иначе это будут не более чем ужасные обмены АИМ-120. (В локоне хотябы один Ф-15-й ими вооружён, в ДКС получается все ястреба на единственном типе машин будут с АИМ-120). А для Ф-16А - достаточно взять какую-нибудь старенькую модификацию АИМ-9, и можно вести полноценный БВБ:);) Хотя неплох вариант, если смоделируют Ф-16С, а миссиоделам датут возможность ограничивать подвески, чтобы бой надо было вести например только с АИМ-9. С другой стороны наличие ранней модификации Ф-16А как-то более атмосферно, если можно так выразиться - интереснее ведь начать летать не на самых последних модификациях, а начать как в реале, с ранних образцов. Нельзя начать летать на Ка-52, не полетав на Ка-50.:) Взять например от же Ил-2 - там игра ведь не Ме-262 живёт, а теми же Ил-2 и И-16;)

leafer there's no one answer to your question. Every airfield will have its own procedures. The departure and arrival procedures will specify a track, altitude restrictions, and, maybe, airspeed requirements. The track can be defined by TACAN or INS between waypoints with altitude limits at various waypoints. There may be a visual ground track in lieu of an instrument procedure. The visual departure and arrival is more expeditious and permits more aircraft to fit into the air space. It also has the benefit of denying an enemy navigation aids like TACAN to attack your base. In a combat zone they would be turned off if there was a threat and you would have to fly by reference to the ground or INS. Arrival is much the same. There is usually an instrument arrival to an instrument approach or a "gate" where you can join the visual traffic pattern. The visual pattern is defined locally by a track, altitudes, and required airspeeds. The overhead pattern is one you should learn. I won't go into it now since it is more complex than I have time to explain. A copy of the A-10 Dash 1 can give you a hint about what it is if not a good idea of how to actually fly it. There are several guys around who can clue you in if you really are interested. The Dash 1 has some other good information. For instance: Standard climb speed is 200 KIAS minus 1 knot per 1000' above sea level (MSL) Single engine best climb speed is 170 KIAS minus 1 knot per 1000' above sea level (MSL) clean and varies with gear down or flaps down by minus 10 knots for each Cruise speeds and altitudes are dependent on a number of variables. There are charts to pick an optimum altitude and airspeed/mach based on gross weight, drag index, and atmospheric conditions of temperature and wind. For the kind of flying done in the sim 200-300 KIAS is fine as there is seldom any reason to be precise. I'd suggest you pick something, say 250 KIAS, and learn to maintain, as well as a specific altitude, it at all times you're not blowing up stuff or getting shot at. Max range cruise is ~15.6 units of AOA IRL but I don't know how close it is in the sim. There's something to play with... Takeoff and landing speeds are dependent on temperature, pressure altitude, gross weight, and drag index. Generally, rotating to takeoff pitch attitude at 120 KIAS and holding it until you fly off the ground works quite well. Similarly, maintaining 150 KIAS until you extend the gear and flaps works fine. Approach speed with full flaps can vary from 110 to 160 KIAS depending on weight. Flying the AOA indexer is the best technique. Note the airspeed where you get the green donut and keeping that speed works fine. There's a start for you. The best I can tell you is to set your own parameters and practice them until you can make the aircraft go where you want at the airspeeds and altitudes you choose. Its all a matter of building the discipline and skill to make the jet do what you want it to do.

Best bus driving game ever :) and it's sequel

DCS: Blackshark GOW Campaign A.05.1 Part 1 GOW Campaign A.05.1 Part 2 DCS: A-10C 'Push' Campaign mission 1.2 'The Shore' Campaign mission 2, part 1 Part 2 Part 3

Much beefier sound. Love it. Beta 5 update. :) Tell me that would not be awesome with a buttkicker strapped to your chair. Gau-8 firing at 1:13 Wonder if I could use that as my ring tone? Have that go off as a ringer with vibrate on? lol.

су-25;)

tuzik Никто и не собирается делать Ф-22 ... наверно ... а дисплей ещё на Миг-29 был ...

Мне нравится когда на нормальных серверах присутствуют и И-16, И-153, и ТБ-3 и прочие "расскинутые" по годам миссий, без маркеров и со строгой дисциплиной. Квака в принципе там отсутствует. Если не нравится убогость то и летайте на детских серверах на самых лучших моделях. Также в современных симах, наподобие ДКС я не поддерживаю стремление делать новейшие ЛА, так сказать - гонкой за модой. А все плоские дисплеи меня вообще раздражают. Привык я к будильникам. Вернее аппараты нравятся до 1990 года. Надо делать те, на которые в большом и общедоступном виде есть информация. В обратном случае можно обмануть пользователей с достоверностью предлагаемых реализаций модели, работы систем и прочего.

как нет? а это что ? http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=792691&postcount=41

Почему на 10 км Су27 и Ф15 вижу хорошо, а с 5- до 2х- вообще не видно?

Ибо не воевали на них практически во время ВМВ, авиасимулятором которой и является Ил-2. Живет он не старьем,а большей частью спитами да фоками вперемешку с худыми. И-16 с лыжами ни кому не уперся, равно как и Арадо на поплавках, или убогий ТБ-3 со звеном. В одном согласен. Главное-играбельность. Интерактивные кликабельные энциклопедии с аншлагом на пол-года как то приедаются. ИМХО

I cast my lines and I hooked.

Only one thing is certain... F-22 = tea party!!! :lol:

A good comparison indeed, come to think of similarities, but which would you say is which?

:smartass:When you say "TiE" fighter do you mean; :D

Now rep the man !

RW procedure (when I was in the AF) Position lights (nav red/green) on anytime power is applied to aircraft. This notifies all ground personnel that control surfaces could move without warning. In some cases, I've seen it amended to "just prior to engine start" until engine shut down. Aircraft that have a "beacon" usually apply nav lights upon any power (apu/battery etc) then prior to engine start, the beacon will be activated and used until engine shut down. Strobes are only activated when rolling onto the runway for take-off, and only in flight when not in formation, and not during any significant cloud cover due to the flash back off of cloud surfaces. Strobes off upon leaving the runway upon landing. (don't think this has changed) Nav/position lights flash/steady I've seen a variation of it's usage at different bases, however when an aircraft is remaining in the pattern ie: touch and go's, I've seen alot go to flash then on steady out of the area in normal flight ops. As for lights "out" operation, that has recently changed, and I have NO idea what the SOP is for that. I do imagine active theater would be common sense lights out however.. I'm sure other's have seen a variation of usages. Just my two cents for FYI.

Вот тут не соглашусь. Да российский рынок меньше, но зайди на сервера. Сколько процентов из них российские? Или сколько пилотов выходящих в онлайн из России? Я могу ошибаться, но мне кажется что процентов 20 вирпилов из бывшего СНГ. Согласен? ЕД вроде бы считают, что онлайн выходят 5-10 % купивших игру вследствие этого можно прикинуть размер рынка рынка бывшего СНГ.

I'm going to try to get something put together later today. If not it it will be here tomorrow.

мне и одного ка-50 по уши хватает, зачем второй, не надо второго )))

Thanks for bringing this one back to the front again! I had it years ago, but it didn't run very well. Now with all the patching done and new hardware it has become a real gem. I even bought it a second time now, due to this thread, cause I can't find my old disk after moving homes. It's a great example of how some games can mature very VERY well!

Если нужны будут фотки обращайтесь

Here's my GAU8 ringtone. I attached it in the user files section as well. GAU8Ringtone.zip

Bad conversation to start. It's like any other... it'll just be a bunch of nationalistic BS and about 80% longwinded spew. :D

All the info you need is here. http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=60293

Er... what about it? There's basically no game-related content on that site, all it is is troubleshooting info and a squadron directory.

Happy Birthday, have a good one!

You will usually have to fit your speed/climb speed to your CDU-requested IAS in missions with given TOTs. You could also find yourself in a mission where you'd additionally have to take fuel burn into acoount also. I'd say besides a minimum safe climb speed there are not too many procedure-side-restrictions on how you would climb rather than mission-timing/threat-related factors. Finally all depends on the mission builder and the pilot(s) how far they want this thing to go. At least there are enough tables, charts and numbers available, to do some hardcore realistic flight planning, taking into acount stuff like weight, weather, loadout-drag, TOT, fuel capacities, changes in grossweight after dropping ordnance,...

SIDS and STARS are followed and the climb rates are up to the crews, but if they are less than AIM standard ATC must be told. Once the crews reach the MOA or Range thay are working, they are "Cleared Tactical" and work the mission via the assistance of other Assets (AWACS, JSTARS, GCI etc) The speed rules that apply to civilian aircraft don't really apply to fighters as there is a caveat in the AIM and the ATC regs that states crews may flight higher speeds if needed for mission accomplishment to include training.

I'd assume climb at Vx/Vy, whichever is needed, using an instrument departure most likley, unless working in say a restricted area/moa like the areas around nellis. TACAN/INS navigation to waypoints, and boom!

Yo yo :drunk: Be good, have Fun!

This recall thing really sucks.. Alot of extra work, Im thinking about just using the unaffected sata ports and forget about it. Depends on how they handle it.

That Navy stripper looked like he was booked for an ass-pirates' party (apologies to any homosexuals out there-just a joke term).

Have you read the JTAC section in the flight manual starting at page 640? The most simplified way I can put it is: Contact JTAC and check-in. Wait for the 9-line to finish and after a short pause, they will say "advise when ready for remarks and further talk-on" Use the radio to say you're ready for remarks After receiving remarks, use the radio to provide the 9-line readback. JTAC will confirm readback okay, and say 'standby data'. You'll then receive a message on both MFCDs saying NEW TASKING; acknowledge this with the ack OSB at the bottom right or TMS LEFT SHORT. On your TAD, you will have a WILCO and a CNCMP option on the left and right. Use the WILCO option to accept the tasking. You'll see a red triangle on the TAD. Make the TAD the SOI, use the throttle slew control to put the cursor over the triangle, use TMS UP SHORT to hook the triangle, and then TMS UP LONG to make it the SPI. Use CHINA HAT FWD LONG to slew everything to the SPI (i.e. location of that triangle). At this point, your targeting pod will pointing at the coordinates the JTAC provided. Use it to locate the precise position of your target(s). Exactly how you prosecute the attack depends on the type of control in effect and how the target is marked; I'd suggest reading page 642 at the very least. If you just go in guns blazing without following procedure your JTAC will tell you to abort.

...you've read everything about DCS A-10C here, go over to simHQ, read everything there, google for other DCS A-10C forums, start posting over at the BS and FC forums although u dont play those games and get on their nerves ...you consider buying a Hotas Warthog although you have a X52 pro that works perfectly with A-10C ...you join the DCS A-10C facebook group and read every post there ...you read the beta4 manual the second time and can't wait for the beta 5 manual to search for changes ...you try and have parallel installations of beta 1, 2, 3 and 4 because you feel nostalgic about each version so far ...you search IMDB by keywords "warthog", "thunderbolt, "jet fighter", "CAS", and many more ...you browse the US Air Force recruitment offices' web sites to see how you'd become an A-10 pilot if you were still young and didn't have your boring office job and family ...you know how to reset and/or re-init the CIDU, CADC and HARS in the CDU and even needed to do so while in a mission ...you don't understand how anyone doesn't know what the SYS/LRUTEST page is really good for ...you're playing selfmade 6h transfer missions with travel pods and external tanks mounted ...you wish you could make jokes in this thread about YOUR wife wanting sex and you rather playing A-10C, while you play A-10C and your wife doesnt want sex okay enough for know, have to check youtube if there's a new A-10C video online while i was writing this...

What did you expect if you are fully loaded; try the same with the flanker and don't get me started with the mig-29 which is provably the worst since it has small sweet spots unlike the eagle. You are not flying the eagle as it is supposed to; you keep your energy; you use your power advantage and stay high if you can. if you go to a dogfight carring your 3 fuel tanks and 100%fuel and still expect to spank a lightly loaded mig you are not doing it right. The eagle actually shakes a lot when fling low due to its low wing-loading and shape. It is not like you can't fight low; it is that you need to know your stuff because the su-27 has better turn performance down low if lightly loaded. What f-15 pilots like about the eagle is not that it is the best at everything; it is that it is the best balanced fighter;it is not like the older migs; that give you good turn performance for dogfight but low tech radar, not so good missiles and poor situational awareness. Add to the mix that americans provably already know how to jam early mig-29s and su-27s since they got first hand info from a soviet spy(if I'm not mistaken the guy was executed) it may not turn the best down low but it turn better than most fighters; it excels high and has better weapons than most fighters.

I've just added Android support for my control app. It is very much like touchbuddy, but somewhat simpler to use and set up. It also has advanced features like auto mapping of buttons of any shape and such. It has complete, 2 way networking support (LAN, WiFi or even internet), too. I'm still adding functionality and preparing an iOS version of it. If you have ideas for features, just let me know. Here are some videos: You can get the free trial from here: http://www.sto-advanced.com/yhtk/

Нет, конечно. Просто надо внести игру в список программ-исключений. А, вот еще нашел, с картинками - http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=887586&postcount=4.

I hope you got sorted it out Wolf. I know that many people that actually know the answer don't post because they don't have time to find the next question, and that's ok. What if that people post a fast answer to the question and if they're correct they pass the baton saying something like 'the next one choose'. Then someone post the next question. That would make the thread more dynamic. What do you think? Ok, name this aircraft :)

A-10c

Не нашел темы про наземную технику в игре, и это меня удивило. Только начинаю играть в Ка-50, но, скажу честно, в этом авиасиме, безусловно, обладающем массой достоинств, меня поражают модели бронетехники. Хочу высказать людям, работавшим над ней, свое восхищение. Поразительно, но в этом ависимуляторе бронетехника выглядит гораздо лучше, чем в подавляюшем большинстве стратегий! Отличная детализация, текстуры, высокое разрешение. По-моему, было бы отлично на базе DCS сделать танковый сим или стратегию:) Хотя там почти это осуществлено.

Согласен. Повреждения техники прописаны ужасно. На форуме все требуют АФМ для леталок. Вот что-то подобное нужно и наземке. К примеру в стратегии Faces of war и гусеници рвутся, и башню с танков срывает, и движки горят, но танк стреляет... Кроме того меня удивляет, почему уничтоженый мост, в котором кроме железа и бетона ничего нету, горит несколько минут, а уничтоженная боевая машина с несколькими сотнями литров топлива и десятками снарядов несколько секунд?

ИМХО, после того, как было создано достаточное количество обновлённых моделей наземной техники, наилудшим было бы приступить к созданию модели повреждений для неё.