Jump to content

F-2

Members
  • Posts

    1063
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by F-2

  1. I’ll do it but are we sure what agency has them?
  2. Fella, if you see these things for sale online, you need to buy it. These things are so rare that it would be impossible to start a project and collect documentation. You need to start collecting NOW and then people Will think it’s doable.
  3. If you can get it Running A-10 Attack! And Cuba! Are this exactly with a clickable cockpit and realistic flight and damage model. A temporary aid to your thirst.
  4. F-15k would be more similar to the F-15e Razbam is making
  5. Polish Mig-29 are Mill-1553 standard and we have the Mig-29G. This would be really cool to have.
  6. Hey does anybody have a three view of the original J-10?
  7. I don’t expect it, but dream big or go home actually if the AI version happens I’ll still really be happy. I do feel like we will know their next move in the not too distant future.
  8. Apparently the J-10a fleet were scheduled to get their radars replaced with the Jeff’ block III air cooled AESA https://bmpd.livejournal.com/3408313.html? hopefully this makes the old standard J-10 possible one day.
  9. I believe that’s an ambition for some point. When I don’t know.
  10. I just mean he wasn’t able to get documentation in-spite Of going to the manufacturer.
  11. They sold Yak-41 data. I’m not sure about the Yak-38, I’ve seen it mentioned occasionally but never in any kinda source. The F-35 system program office went with Lockheed to evaluate the plane so they would be the ones to ask. besides being a different time though these laws are odd. The Russian MOD will deny just about any request for information but won’t stop Malaysia from hiring a company in Pennsylvania to develop an Su-30 simulator.
  12. Wasn’t Cuban Ace trying to develop a Yak-38 and was denied documentation by Yak?
  13. If anyone knows he’s talking about the Peace Sun IV eagles. These where deliver after the end of the normal F-15 production ended. The F-15D have a Strike Eagle body, common engine bay, APG-70 but otherwise have D avionics. The C they got at the same time I’m not sure about.
  14. Not surprised by this. Ive actually heard this is a big reason the USAF dragged their feet replacing AIM-9m.
  15. I know about the post gulf war Saudi Eagles. Did they definitely have the 229?
  16. Yes, the ones the responded to 9/11 unfortunately where some of the last with the 100.
  17. I think the ones that responded to 9/11 where able to carry AMRAAM. I do remember they where limited to mach 1.2ish with a load because of the f100-100 engines. Apparently the 220 engine is better once you pass mach .8 or so.
  18. IRL Aim-120a made some shots Aim-9m couldn’t. It might not be a 9x but it’s not terrible up close.
  19. Their is a lot of public information on AIM-120a that’s applicable to the B. In theory we could probably build an extremely realistic AIM-120b including ECM and the like. Charts GAO reports etc. all hypothetical of course.
  20. That’s a great point about the Jeff’s early access
  21. Yea me too I’d love a J-10a, I love the J-10 family. Also they never said the Su-30mkk was never gunna happen just they didn’t have enough for a FF module at the time. Which they said from the beginning. If those ever end up happening and the J-11A gets the upgrades they wanna do 2000s red would be very respectable.
  22. Some people like the challenge. Sometimes so older senarios before such missiles where operational. Other like to Use the Aim-120b as it’s more of a match for R-77.
  23. Aim-120B is an older AMRAAM. C has longer range, a better warhead, and less draggy “clipped” fins. Our Aim-120c is a C5 AIM-9l and AIM-9M as all aspect sidewinders. M is just a slight overall improvement to L. X is a high off boresight missile that can be fired with a helmet mounted sight and has a much more advanced seeker. Our aim-9x is a block 1
×
×
  • Create New...