VirusAM

Hi buddy.... You are correct....but maybe until they develop a more friendly terrain technology (in order to have bigger maps without slideshows) they could just place lower fidelity areas over Italy, except for the places near the involved airbases and have an higher fidelity area over the balkans. As an Italian (as you well know) I would not be offended by this philosophy as the main focus would be recreating combat ops...sightseeing can be done in another way :D

Rinnovo i complimenti e le felicitazioni già fatte a vari membri in privato su altri canali. So quanto avete lavorato per ottenere questo status, e quanto è stato complicato. Io personalmente che conosco molti di voi , sono orgoglioso ed emozionato.

Hi, would be better if you attach a track(s) in order to show the issue. Thanks

DMS Up, make the HUD SOI. To switch SOI between MFDs you need to press DMS down. This is the correct behavior

Ah ok...I am already there then. I was thinking you were referring to a winwing specific server. Thanks

Not sure if it is intended, but I think it is WIP

where is the winwing discord server? I cannot find it anywhere

You would have marginal gains if any. I think it is best to wait and see what amd will release next month (ryzen 4000 series).

[result] rtx 3080 for VR If you are cpu bottlenecked the only way to observe differences in performances between two different gpus is to move the load towards the gpu, so raising the resolution. If you want to compare two different processors you should do the opposite...lower the res in order to move the load towards the CPU. Anyway here you (we) want to compare GPUs, so raise your res (super sampling) and use the simplest mission possible (no ai units). The best one I usually use for benchmarking GPU framtimes is the Fa/18 instant action in persian gulf map. Fly over abu dhabi and observe the differences between resolutions or even better switching GPUs

Try to raise supersampling to a level where the gpu is the bottleneck...then you probably will see the difference

Pd of 1.5 is very different from 150% ss... So which of the one did you use? Pd of 1.5 in dcs or oculus software is more then 200% ss in steamvr for instance.

[result] rtx 3080 for VR Much depends from the situation. Mission fulls of scripting and ai units will destroy even the best cpu...and the gpu cannot help there. I didn’t watch his video so I don’t know how he tested it.

If you plan to go reverb, it uses motion vector which is WMR equivalent. I am using an Index right now, but I tried WMR and the motion vector didn’t seem bad to me. I don’t know if it still the case but there is an overhead as wmr devices need another software for using with steamvr (wmr for steamvr) which eats some millisecond per frame...

Thanks that makes a lot of sense.

Eurofighter relative flight performance, feat. Gero Finke I think some approximate value is normal

Fair but still the Hornet can point its nose (guns) where the Typhoon cannot at these speed. So my point is better to avoid the adversary (few) advantages and try to not get slow. And yes I know the ef2000 has thrust to spare and can easily accelerate...but still there are other good fighters out there (rafale, su35, f22) which won’t forgive a Typhoon pilot mistake (and viceversa).

Hi Elmo... Good luck on your new role.... About the memes...best to laugh then cry :) Anyway I am sure Razbam team is doing its best and I also don’t think that their modules are bad, or worse then other 3d party ones...but effectively their communication strategy has not been the best one...

Well so the limited AOA should not be a big issue if the Typhoon pilot manages to avoid slow flight?Then having a good speed sustainment seems an advantage to me in this aspect as if both planes are at very slow speed (for example vs an Hornet) in a guns-only situation (no iris-t and no aim-9x) the Typhoon could have serious troubles...did i get the picture? Ps thanks Tits for your time... The Typhoon is my dream plane from when i was a child...so it is very nice to have the possibility to interact with real pilots.

Thanks Gero for taking your time to answer our questions really appreciate to have some insight on my favorite jet. Can’t wait to fly it, it will be my dream becoming true

Yeah I am following him, but his thread on dcs forum seems dead.

Congratulations, really nice. Was it difficult to adapt to the TM connector?

Wow that is wonderful, i had the g940 in the past, i sold it because of the lack of buttons. I tried to gather informations on how to use a different grips, but unfortunately my manual/electronics skills are not so good to do this mod...so sadly i had to get rid of it. I wish someone could do a FFB base with common grips compatibility (cheaper that the brunner cls-e). In any case congratulations for your awesome mod.

Yes but even a 3090 won’t be enough to keep 90/80 or even 60 fps in an heavy mission full of AI and scripting especially in MP.

DCS: F-14 Tomcat by Heatblur Simulations Esatto.... È noto da anni (da quando è stato annunciato il Tomcat) che verrà accompagnato da svariati assetti AI tra cui appunto l’intruder. Anche altre 3d-party hanno realizzato la stessa cosa (ai tankers o portaerei), e la stessa heatblur dovrebbe aggiunger il draken ai per accompagnare il Viggen...per cui sembra essere pratica comune.

They get on the Rift S (I got it also when I used it before the Index), because of what I wrote on my above post. Many people fail to understand that in a flight simulator, and in DCS in particular, the CPU IPC count is more important then the Graphics card. And there is no CPU that can run average dcs missions in VR at 90 (neither 60 trust me) every time. Of course the GPU has its own importance, but when the CPU cannot feed enough frames per second to the card to render, there is nothing it can do. This is not easy to address for developers. They would need to rebuild completely the dcs engine, and probably also to simplify some calculations in the background for far units for example. I hope this clarifies many doubts people seems to have with VR performances.