VirusAM

Thanks Gero for taking your time to answer our questions really appreciate to have some insight on my favorite jet. Can’t wait to fly it, it will be my dream becoming true

Yeah I am following him, but his thread on dcs forum seems dead.

Congratulations, really nice. Was it difficult to adapt to the TM connector?

Wow that is wonderful, i had the g940 in the past, i sold it because of the lack of buttons. I tried to gather informations on how to use a different grips, but unfortunately my manual/electronics skills are not so good to do this mod...so sadly i had to get rid of it. I wish someone could do a FFB base with common grips compatibility (cheaper that the brunner cls-e). In any case congratulations for your awesome mod.

Yes but even a 3090 won’t be enough to keep 90/80 or even 60 fps in an heavy mission full of AI and scripting especially in MP.

DCS: F-14 Tomcat by Heatblur Simulations Esatto.... È noto da anni (da quando è stato annunciato il Tomcat) che verrà accompagnato da svariati assetti AI tra cui appunto l’intruder. Anche altre 3d-party hanno realizzato la stessa cosa (ai tankers o portaerei), e la stessa heatblur dovrebbe aggiunger il draken ai per accompagnare il Viggen...per cui sembra essere pratica comune.

They get on the Rift S (I got it also when I used it before the Index), because of what I wrote on my above post. Many people fail to understand that in a flight simulator, and in DCS in particular, the CPU IPC count is more important then the Graphics card. And there is no CPU that can run average dcs missions in VR at 90 (neither 60 trust me) every time. Of course the GPU has its own importance, but when the CPU cannot feed enough frames per second to the card to render, there is nothing it can do. This is not easy to address for developers. They would need to rebuild completely the dcs engine, and probably also to simplify some calculations in the background for far units for example. I hope this clarifies many doubts people seems to have with VR performances.

Asynchronous Reprojection explained aka ghosting, stuttering, etc Good post. I personally don’t care about Motion Smoothing. I notice it but I don’t care about it...better have it that have low fps in VR. Also you don’t consider something that in DCS in quite important. The low fps often are not due to the graphic card. That depends from many factors, but let’s say that in a fairly complex dcs mission, with ai units and triggers, and scripting the cpu will be the bottleneck so even the 3090 won’t save us. For that there is no solution. Of course Vulkan and multithread will help...but dcs calculate every single bullet, so complex missions won’t never be easy on the CPU.

Prendilo l’av8b se in sconto....merita assolutamente

DCS: Mirage M2000C by RAZBAM Falco tu sei sempre fuori luogo. 1 questo non è il 3d corretto. 2 hai scocciato con le tue lamentele continue....spesso immotivate. L’harrier avrà pure dei bug (ditemi quale modulo dcs non li ha) ma è tranquillamente utilizzabile ed aggiungerei anche molto divertente. Tu sei assolutamente libero di non spendere i tuoi soldi su moduli che non ritieni interessanti o non ben fatti...ma sarebbe da evitare il dare false informazioni (spero che tu almeno abbia provato il modulo in questione prima di emettere le tue sentenze).

I created a steerpoint using the coordinates given by the jtac and then refined the aimpoint with the tgp.

Rws can absolutely be used for firing solution, (it switches to STT) and it is by no means low fidelity. Quite the opposite in reality

Amazon takes the money only when they ship.... I don’t know if amazon spain still offers it at 599 but I preordered there..

I agree...as the bottleneck is more on the CPU side of things. Of course there can be some benefit but not a whole changing difference

Yeah...for FBW aircraft FFB is not indispensable. But some real life FBW jets have effects similar to Force Feedback. Just the Hornet is an example of this...both on the stick and the pedals. Of course it doesn't shake when buffeting, but it changes its behavior depending on the FCS configuration... So if properly implemented by ED a FFB stick would be worth it.

Help to identify Tornado version/nationality. My bet is a German one..Uk retired it...and I never saw an Italian one with that pod (the one under the left wing)

Please do it with sections and bookmarks which can be saved between sessions.... Looking forward to this other extension.

Strange...their Harrier seems in pretty good state right now.. Yes it still has some issues, but comparing it to VEAO modules seems pretty unfair to me.

Is there a way to make it MP compatible?

Boeing? Boeing has nothing to do with the Eurofighter....

Mmm.....interesting

Visibile range meno di high è un no-go...sopra i 15000 piedi vedi solo mare....lo sconsiglio....medium è proprio il minimo minimo sopportabile. Invece textures del terreno su low, la differenza visiva neanche si vede e risparmi anche memoria video. Ombre del terreno su flat o off...meglio off

È wip.... La usavo un annetto fa ma poi i side effects somo diventati più pesanti e la differenza di prestazioni meno evidente. Cmq quando completato dovrebbe migliorare teoricamente le prestazioni del 30%. Intanto in una delle ultime versioni OB hanno risolto alcuni degli effetti collaterali (il personale della supercarrier renderizzato in un solo occhio) In pratica è una implementazione custom del “single pass stereo”

You as a customer not...but 30% of what you pay for DCS modules goes to Valve..... So in my opinion better to buy modules from ED shop and so everything you pay will go to ED and fund other modules and core upgrades

Probably it is just a placeholder