Omega417

Thats a good looking nose right there.

I think the big issue people have with communication stems from both big studio update cycles, and real world job update cycles. Working in software and other fields, it doesnt matter if my work has been nothing but conducting peer reviews for the past 2 weeks, I am still required to give a status update to my boss. Scheduling and contract progress reports depend on this status being known. We have also been spoiled by Friday updates from ED, even if there is no real news there, at least we get a quick blurb from the developer. These developers havent signed a contract with us that requires them to inform us of their status. As much as i would love to see a quarterly status update, even if its just code percentages, there is no requirement for an update.

Not a lot of love for the long nose RF-4 Variants in here.

J/S and K/M are too sleek for me.

Which Phantom Nose do y'all find most aesthetically appealing? I myself find the B/N nose to be the most appealing, with its smaller nub.

Im actually on team "delay 1 week". The last week of winter i am super busy at work, but i have the next 2 weeks off. So like delay it a week for me and i can fly it nonstop for 2 weeks.

Vietnam was boring compared to WW2 liveries. Really wish they'd let squadron commanders chose what they wanted their birds to look like.

In all fairness it shouldnt be that hard to make a massive midway map. A few small islands in the middle and a massive expanse of water in all directions.

Avenger would be LIT, buuuuutttttttttttttt SBD Dauntless would be much better.

Why does he have an M-4 and not an L-86?

The video creator could have put our Phantom in a French Navy livery, and had it attacking a British Rapier site, and still called it a Wild Weasel mission. The term has been taken over for a modern meaning. I personally prefer SEAD/DEAD, but HUNTER/KILLER is also pretty cool. But its way easier to ask a wingman to Weasel that missile site so we can have a better chance at destroying it.

Ok negative Nancy, ill go be excited over A6 somewhere else.

Did anyone else see the AI A-6? at 1:05?

Darn, if only had payed attention in High School German.

Im not wrong.

Lot of armchair generals in a topic asking if our plane will have any form of datalink.

If we do get a 1970s EW picture, I feel the F-4C Wild Weasel IV would fit perfectly. Modified F-4C, extra antenna, extra systems, etc. Not too powerful, got just enough systems to be deadly to SAM sites.

This little tidbit alone makes designing planes for the DOD a nightmare. Every branch calls the exact same thing something a little different then act like you are crazy for calling it something else. Some of the liaisons are pretty chill if you call something by another services name, others will get ticked off.

You could always win the "CIA Excellence in Journalism" award for your efforts

Stolen from YouTube, made in 90 seconds

Well now i am sold. haha JK ive wanted all the McDonnell aircraft in game since forever.

Next time i will be sure to add *SARCASM* to the end haha. Don't worry brother, I will wait.

The manual would be a nice Christmas present. I could go out and get it printed and put in a nice binder and spend my break studying it and taking notes. Hint Hint, Wink Wink. Otherwise Im a size

The only visual IDing I will be doing is visually identifying your wreckage on the ground.