NineLine

Oh, very cool I will check soon. Thanks so much for this!

Track from the crash file didnt work, but was easy enough to reproduce, will report it. Thanks all! Update: Already fixed internally.

Thanks, will take a look.

I quickly took a peek at the track in the first post and it did not seem to be a fog issue at all, I will flag it with our team and get it looked at. PS looking at the posts after this one I see the interesting finds, thanks all for checking. It's flagged now with the team.

That is what I am wondering, possible his 'vision' needs to be tuned, but I can't look right now.

Sorry all being Christmas, I would take a look when I can, let me know if there is fog in the mission at all.

2006 would probably still be controlled, but if you know of a valid legal place to download from then it could possibly be useable. I generally only see the older ones out there.

To bring our F-5E more in line with the Swiss F-5E operating with US forces, we are open to investigating the addition of the digital radios and the INS. However, public information on the operations of these appear to be limited. If anyone is aware of such data, kindly message us and we’d be happy to take a look. Thanks all!

Its still WIP, so a number of items may not have destruction models yet. Thanks.

Moved to Missions and Campaigns and marked as reference, thanks for the work on this, its appreciated!

Yes, we use legally sourced documents, that does not mean that we can share or reference them. We do not just look at the internet for sources. And that fact means nothing as neither of those sources was used according to our dev team, thanks.

Unless I missed it, no evidence has been sent. Sorry.

Your assessment of the data we used is not correct, we did not use this as a source but we are also unable to share our sources. As well, you should be careful leaning too hard on Tacview, while it is a good tool to feed speculation, it is not necessarily valid for diagnosis.

Also, keep in mind it's not our intention to do a 1:1 representation of Iraq. It's important to have some decent POIs, have the towns and cities have the look and feel with some key buildings and more so airfields to be more accurate. But to achieve a 1:1 representation would be an much to long to do, and little reward for towns and cities people may never interact with. To add to this, the map will be mixed era to allow the most mission possibilities and fun for customers. So keep this all in mind for expectations and bug reporting, major POIs we will very much consider. Where there is over usage of a certain model is also fair to report, but as I said, keep in mind its WIP, and these things may change or have already changed internally. Thanks!

The map is in early access as we have stated POIs are still being fleshed out, that said if you have found an issue then post a bug thread about it, posting here is just going to get lost if you are hoping for us to see it. Thanks.

Ok, it appears to be related to the country you set it to, if I run the track or open the track in the ME, and then run it, it doesn't work, if I change it to USA it works. Seems like it doesn't like the Red Coalition. If I make a clean mission with changing the coalition members it seems to work fine with red. So something weird going on, but anyway the lesson of the day is always include a track

Just tried again, again setting a custom waypoint and it seemed to work, will try the track now as well. I was using the L-39C for my test. I'll admit I do not use this much so maybe I am not replicating the steps exactly. Will report back after the track.

Thought I tried both but it was a long day yesterday, will try again. Thanks for the track.

The SA team supplied us with the artwork. We are trying to clear up what happened now. Thanks.

I just tried entering my own waypoint in the L-39 with the NS430 and it seems to be working. Just tried choosing direct to one of the airfields and it worked fine as well, this is why its also good to include a track on any bug report it might be something with a specific aircraft, or something else, as of right now I cannot reproduce the bug sorry.

I think you are being a little dramatic about it, we said after what we have planned is done we would look at other airbases, I think there are more than plenty including the ones that added to thoroughly enjoy the map. Most customers do not want a really long flight time to get to the action. The request has been noted, but closing now as we do not need to start questioning our decision-making or design decisions in a less-than-constructive manner.

Reported, thanks!

Well that's interesting, will check it out.

This area is WIP and not complete yet, thanks.

Thanks I will take a look. The reason I wanted to see the exact coordinates is so if it is being worked on yet I could show what it looks like internally, it never hurts to give more info than needed. Thanks.