NineLine

Using the same examples, the SH and the MH-60, the reason is we are still finishing the Charlie, so starting a SH doesn't make sense in that regards. As for the MH-60, our helo teams are simply tied up with current work right now. A FF Su-27 is possible, but the team that would do that most likely would be the one nose deep in a MiG-29 right now.

Yes, its not lack of data right now holding back the SH, not sure about the MH-60, but I believe the same.

That doesnt mean its too classified.

That's a silly statement, sorry. Especially with the ALE-50 already planned.

Its our job, and we found enough info on the F-35, so that is why we are doing that opposed to a Gripen. Thanks.

We will discuss the variant closer to release and when we have a more solid feel. IIB was removed from the FAQ to allow some more leeway on that. We have researched for over 2 years on this, and continue to do so. We will update later. Thanks.

You are assuming there is enough info on the Gripen, have you done research on either?

No, that is not true. a Superhornet, these days, is very possible. Data on them is not an issue. Thanks.

F-100D Super Sabre Development Report The F-100Ds’ development team, Grinnelli Designs, recently traveled again to Texas to work with the Collings Foundation’s F-100 Super Sabre. This unique opportunity allowed them to capture authentic cockpit audio during flight, preserving the raw and immersive sounds of this iconic aircraft. Please watch the F-100D Dev Log: The Road to Realism - Part 2. Beyond their work in Texas, they have been focusing on refining the cockpit model. By enhancing the geometry and textures they have ensured that even the most intricate details are represented with precision. Grinnelli Designs has made substantial improvements to testing and verifying the flight model through the implementation of in-house physics simulation tools. This allows them to quickly verify the accuracy of any changes to the flight model. Work has taken place in other areas such as the “Hun’s” unique Radar Warning Receiver (AN/APR-25 RHAW), Weapons Systems, Electrical Systems, Damage Model, Low Altitude Bombing System, and much more. “These efforts define our commitment to creating a highly realistic and immersive experience that reflects the legacy of the F-100 Super Sabre. Thank you for your continued support.” - Grinnelli Designs

Sorry, you were told this is most likely on your end. Making more posts about it will not fix it. Thanks.

Why the F-35A? The F-35 is rapidly becoming the backbone of tactical combat aviation of many countries. Its combination of low observability, sensor fusion, and advanced sensors has brought 5th generation combat aviation to today’s battlefield. We chose to simulate this aircraft based on its fame and the large number of both combat aviation enthusiasts and more casual virtual pilots that are eager to experience its capabilities on the modern, virtual battlefield that only DCS can offer. What version of the F-35? We will first release the F-35A. We may later also offer the F-35B Vertical Takeoff and Landing (VTOL) and F-35C aircraft carrier catapult versions, but this has yet to be determined. How will you simulate it given the lack of reference documents? Starting around 2010, hands-on F-35 demonstrations became commonplace at defense tradeshows. These featured detailed system demonstrations that covered a broad range of operations and capabilities that provided great insight into the operation of the aircraft across different mission types. Our goal is to create an F-35A simulation that combines this wealth of data with academic papers, public sub-systems data, and common Pilot Vehicle Interface (PVI) to fill in only a few areas lacking any information (like other existing DCS aircraft). Compared to other modern aircraft, we’ve discovered a great deal more information about its operation than most 4 and 4+ generation aircraft. Our F-35A will not be based on guesswork, watching air shows, Wikipedia or anything like that. Rather it is being designed in relation to credible data that we feel very confident will provide a good representation of what it is to operate this aircraft in the context of a study-level flight simulation game for the entertainment market. When will it be available? Development will start in earnest in 2025, with a release goal in 2026. This is subject to change. When we have a more specific date, we will update this FAQ. How much will it cost? The specific cost has yet to be determined for the F-35A, but it will be in-line with pricing of other full-fidelity, complex, modern aircraft in DCS. What weapons will be included?The complete weapons suite of a US F-35A in the 2015-time frame is planned. This includes the internal 25mm cannon, AIM-9X, AIM-120, GBU-31, GBU-32, and GBU-12. This list is subject to change during development. What countries will be included? The F-35A as operated by the US Air Force simulated but will have liveries for several countries including Australia, Norway, The Netherlands, Italy, Denmark, Belgium, Japan, South Korea, and Israel. More may be added later. How will you model its low observable characteristics? This will be based on open-source data and account for radar angle, range, and external stores, and open bays. How will you simulate the flight model given the lack of flight performance data? This would be derived from a combination of open-source performance charts, public F-35A pilot accounts of unique handling characteristics to test against, and Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) studies. Would this not unbalance DCS? Larger numbers of hostile aircraft can outweigh the F-35A's advantages in single-player missions (player versus environment). It will also lend itself well to cooperative multiplayer missions that are created to challenge F-35A pilots. Whilst in multiplayer player-versus-player, the F-35A will initially be the 800-pound gorilla in the room, its advantages can be offset with limited slots, creative mission building, and the later introduction of more comparable aircraft like the Eurofighter and others.

Why the F-15C? The F-15C has been a pillar of United States, and other nations, air superiority for decades. While the F-15C has featured in Lock On and then the Flaming Cliffs series, it’s now time for a full-fidelity simulation of this legendary fighter. A full-fidelity F-15C will join the F-14, F-16C, and F/A-18C to round out US 4th generation fighters in DCS. It will also serve as a great counterpart to the upcoming MiG-29A. What version of the F-15C? As with the Flaming Cliffs version, it will be an F-15C Multi-Stage Improvement Program (MISP) II as operated by the US Air Force in the early 2000s. This will feature either the AN/APG-63(V)1 or AN/APG-70 radars (TBD which one), Programable Armaments Control System (PACS), the JTIDS datalink with Situational (SIT) Display, and Joint Helmet Mounted Cuing System (JHMCS) with AIM-9X. It will be powered by two F100-PW-220 engines. Will it just be an updated Flaming Cliffs F-15C? Not at all. The entire external model and cockpit will be rebuilt to meet 2025 graphical standards. The avionics, sensor, and weapon systems will be at the highest level of fidelity with a fully interactive cockpit. While the flight model will be based on the Flaming Cliffs version, it will be further improved. Please note the Flaming Cliffs version will remain unchanged. When will it be available? Development will start in earnest in 2025, with a release goal in 2026. This is subject to change. When we have a more specific date, we will update this FAQ. How much will it cost? The specific cost has yet to be determined for the F-15C, but it will be in line with the pricing of other full-fidelity, complex, modern aircraft in DCS. What weapons will be included? The complete weapons suite of a US F-15C in the mid-2000s time frame is planned. This includes the internal M61A2 20mm cannon, AIM-9L/M/P3/X, AIM-7F/M/MH, and AIM-120B/C. As this is based on the US F-15C, it solely carries air-to-air weapons. What countries will be included? There will be a single F-15C version as operated by the US Air Force, but it will have liveries for several countries' liveries including Japan, Israel, and Saudi Arabia.

Dear all, Sven of Polychop has made a statement on this, which you have all seen and I will share once again. There is nothing to discuss here on this subject, it is internal and private. This is a support forum for our products and that is all that we need to discuss on this. If something new comes up and Sven thinks it's important for all of you to hear it, it will be announced on their Discord I am sure. But for now, let's please not turn this into something it is not, let's not play to the handful of people who are looking for DCS to fail, and let them sort all this out. All other discussions on this topic will be removed unless, as I said above there is something important to discuss. Thank you NineLine/Norm

Yeah, trains need mucho love.

I believe this is reported already but will confirm. This thread also proved a fight can break out in any topic, bravo gents.

What modules in Early Access have gone 5 years with no improvements?

Hi Dmitri, I am sorry you do not like what it looks like in the real world for a US 2005 Legacy F/A-18C, of which we are trying to model. Arma is not a simulation as I understand it, and can play a little faster and looser with how they want it to look. If you have detailed real-world evidence that it should be different I would be happy to take a look, if this is just a preference thing I cannot do a lot for that. Thanks.

It's not currently planned, but it doesn't mean it won't happen if there is enough demand, I will move this to wishlist for now, and note it with the team. Thanks!

Reported, thanks!

Sorry guys for the delay, I am looking into now, I think its been brought up before, but we had been waiting on the new AI FM. I'll let you know what I find out.

It is not a simple issue to fix or else it would have been already, its reported and we are hoping a solution can be found with all the changes ongoing with the core. Thanks.

Thanks I will be taking a look at this, this week.

Thanks, guys, I will use the info found here https://www.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/104500/b-1b-lancer/ along with your additional information on these and fuel tanks in the bays and go from there. Here is what I have requested: Leaving open for feedback, info and corrections.

Full disclosure, I edited the title, we have certain not abandoned anything. That said, I am not sure what the point of this thread is. You always have to remember to make time for yourself, or you do get burned out, that's what this sounds like. A better thread maybe would have been to suggest what you found to be so difficult and what we could do to improve this. I myself would love to get back to painting some liveries from time to time, but yes the complication has grown over the years as the models started using new technologies, etc. The devs build these things with development in mind and do not always think about how the end user mind use or like to use these things. Feedback in this regard is great to have, and if you already have shared it, point me to it. Heatblur would be responsible for releasing their template. Realistically, you don't yet, the model isn't 100% finalized so the template is not 100% ready for release. When that is ready we will share that with everyone. I am not sure what this is in reference to, but I certainly do not understand why you made the abandonware jab in the title (which I removed). Feedback is critical to DCS's success, there is no way with our Q&A and volunteer tests we can catch every issue, especially when there are so many things people use DCS for. I briefly looked at your post history and didn't see anything related to livery issues. If you decide to return, and we hope you do. Give us some feedback, and if you are worried no one will look, send me a DM when you posted it and I will take a look. Thanks.

This looks like a good idea, the team is on holiday but I will submit it to them for consideration. Thanks!