Baco

kola: At last a proper cold war map!!! very eagerly waiting! besides, beautifull landscapes and demanding terrain. Love the chioce! reminisence of Janes F/A-18 and EF 2000: legendary sims...

I think BZ is not yet working. Redkite only talks about TEL. but havent tryed yet...

Well yeah its part of teh plane. There is no technical way to do a separate thing that ataches to a plane.... Maybe they could have a function that inmobilices the plane when on, but it woudl also be unrealistic...

yes we definatly need a Hunter in DCS.

I agree fully we need legacy air defenses for cold war era jets. Gameplay in DCS is getting ridiculus either WWII or ultramodern and all teh FF mdules are in between... Please give use coherent toys to play sandbox with. Thanks!

Pretty please... Por favor!

Thanks for the warnings guys a very apreciative not customer here. I would have felt infuriated if I had to find out the hard way.... I am not picky but no coms and no damage model are really a deal braker for me.

It doesnt matter what they promis, I am still waiting for the SAAB 35 Draken (Viggen) and the A-6 intruder ... Not to mention the persian cat... But yeah Ground vehicles for having period apropiate assets at the base would be very, very welcome.

yeah circa 2024 LOL

Really Nice!!! when we finaly get the Corsair we can replay the Football War. But My heart is half Uruguayan so I also want to thnak you for those wonderfull skins!!!

Nobady uses it much since it defies the prupose of virtual flying unless you do want to practice emergencies.... Engine faliure means return to base asap. so whats the point of creating a mission were you dont get to fly it. People want realism, Not "too much realism" lol

Excellente guys, thanks alot. The topic becomes relevant in Naval Operations and the new ATC. You can use the Kiss of command and that sort fo things. Not to mention taht you can populate a mission a lot faster taht way too. Thanks again!

I know it is recomenden to create single flights for every client slot. Is this still the case or has it been sorted and we can naow create flights of client slots? In other words, si it still recomended that every client slot should be a single flight? Thanks in advance!

Gracias Eduardo!

Any chance this mod will be fixed? its very unstable for me, depending on the object I choose, my DCS shuts down, digax crash... I love what I can use, but I wish it would be optimized!

I have pedals and I fly sim since 1984.... yes it is "usable" but its a bigger difficulty than it needs to be. You use it alone, put 10 planes on deck and you will see the problem. I hinders Realistic operations of the plane on realistic conditions. The Q had NWS, for instance...and many were retro fitted. you can call us "useless", to those who complain, but it doesn't change the fact that is an unnecessary hassle and a royal pain in the but.

not the same at all my friend. the planes you mention don´t lock the front wheel on a whim, and if no input is given the free casting wheel returns to center very quick. Not the case with the A-4E-C, that is very difficult to guide, and work with. It bafles me that with so much negative feedback the makers of the MOD are not willing to give an option to use or not NWS.

Agree!, and then again we can have multiple Mirages form multiple 3rd parties, I will buy them all!. Like I said before: If its made by Dassault, I´ll buy it.

You are assuming Razbam is only one team. Razbam actually takes small groups or single developers and gives them a place to develop their work. so the work on 4 or 5 modules is simultaneous, not sequential. ED is teh bottleneck here, taking ts time to triple check the work on modules submitted as "release candidates". And on the other side Aerges would start from scratch on the M III or dagger and to date the F1 has been over 4 years in development and still counting ;). So any witch way its going to be at last a couple of years till we see a Mirage III on DC. I would hope ED would fin a better way to sort releases and of course get more 3rd party developers on board.

So, after the summer sale...

Oh it would be grand for Razbam to concentrate on the Dagger M IV and Aerges do the III EE It must be pretty close to the EA This way we could have all the Mirage Family before 2025 !

Oh I agree from Razbam I am waiting for the Pucará, the A 29, the Mig 23, hopefully the Mirage III... I don´t think I will ever get the 15, I have the 16 and the 18, systems wise must be very similar to both of the other teens... I also Want the G.91, A-7, F-8, F-4, I love the "early days of modern air warfare", 60s, 70s...

Oh I am not interested in the 15 at all -Stop rehashing 80s superstars (Jane´s F 15, Gunship, Janes Longbow, etc...)- give me something different give me Mirage F-1

Thanks for the Info mate. Thats what I feared. but maybe someone had discovered a system to occupy a slot in certain order or something. With my squad GAE we were occupying all of us in the runway (catapult), and moving bakwards to let another pilot in, but the new realistic handling of the A4 prevents any such maneuvers. Also found out that if you leave the server and return its easier to get a slot on deck. but to complicated. I guess we will have to get creative with the back story and operate only 6 Scooters at a time from deck.

Hello Guys. My squad is a role play type, and we are based on the 70´s Argentinian navy thus we operate from the ARA 25 de mayo and Independencia. when it was 6 or 8 of us it was just fine but now that we have grown we have trouble occupying slots on the Melbourne carriers. up to 4 is ok, more than that we get the "your flight is delayed" or worst, we spawn on top of each other. Is any other Squad operating A-4s on the Melbourne? Anyone has any experience on how to build missions with 8 to 10 planes on deck to start? We use to spawn in turns and move backwards but with the new "steering" on the A-4 its proving too complicated. Any help or tip will be appreciated. Cheers