Baco

Must admit, that´s a sound argument. I wish they would drop the specificity in DCS and let as have trans era modules, Having late blocks or models BUT being able to carry old weaponry like AIM 9B or bullpups to be able to represent earlier birds of the same make. maybe adding or removing asmll exteriors detaile slike the F1 does now on different modesl that are skin dependant.

Excellent News!! THANK YOU. Gracias Vibora! a pintar se ha dicho!!!

Yes I guess so, still the problem adds to the simple, or better said non existent, damage model for ground units. Some sort of suppression or even track damage could result from splash damage.Maybe not on T-90s or Abrahams, but T-55s or M-60s would be affected.

I would be one. carrier capable and different enough to make it really interesting... Add an official HMS Ark Royal and I´ll even pay full price for it.

So Pto. Natales was not announced and we are missing Santa Cruz as per announced. "New - Added Airfield Aeropuerto de Santa Cruz New - Added Airfield Aeropuerto Guardiamarina Zanartu(Puerto Williams) New - Added Aerodromo Guardiamarina Zanartu (Puerto Williams) New - El Calafate" Cool grate variety so far... Personally hoping Santa Cruz, Luis Piedra Buena and O´higgins are next.

Point taken. And yes I see why the E is the logical comercial conclusion, just like i see why it made sense to have an Apache or a Hind. But its not my cup of tea. Luckily some 70´s aircraft are being made so there will be toy for me in the future and hopefully the option of other models will not be taken off the table in the future for a shinier module like the 95GR was scrapped in favor of the brand new phantom II, EF 2000, etc... and the Intruder pushed back. P.s. the kills stats to justify one model over another makes no sense to me. i would kill for a Panther and it had very few kills, still it was the backbone of the USN in Korea...

Atcually we do have opposition, what red asset we have are more suited for early cold war than modern scenarios. besides 60s and 70s for the red side was pretty rudimentary: mig 17, 19 and 21. we have all three, not exact versions but still very close. Yes i woudl kill for an SU 15, Su 17, maybe a il-28, Yak 28 or any of teh obscure small tactical bombers... But a 90s Tomcat is not close, and a 90s Phantom is not close either.

ok, i get it. Me, i prefer the old ways, the hard way LOL... and it frustrates me to have a "cold war plane" that is not a "cold war asset". I am eagerly waiting for the 95-GR Cat for instance... but i might get stuck with a 135 early ...

I don´t think I will get the E. If you cant launch it from a carrier then I am not interested in a Phantom II. I will wait for the B and can compromise with a J. If you are going to have a legend, give us the war proven original models, not the "franken" rehashes that can do what we already Can do with what we have. Give us new experiences, more variety, not more ways to drop laser bombs...

Its a cold war plane why have the latest and baddest.. give use the essence of the plane: B/C or J tops, It gives us the possibility of flying different air frames with different systems and capabilities.. If you want the latest for PVP get a hornet for Christ sake. Why get a Phantom that can do the same thing as a hornet or eagle?

Well i found it actually the best of the early radars on DCS compared with Mig 19, 21 and F-5. And also NOT magic like early FC3 radars. I enjoy it a lot, it is useful within its limitations and like I said you need to work for the lock its not magic. If anything those 530 track too well LOL.

YEs in principle, yes but I believe the engine of the Kfir gives it the edge in power to weight ratio and better aerodynamics with the canards. a more stable platform. Also I am not very versed on the Kfir but the Nesher had no bombing aids I believe and i think the Kfir did introduce some kind of ccip or at least a rudimentary ccrp. Still yes dealing with DCS we need to use what we have and sometimes is not ideal. but the F1 is more age related and same avionics suit in case of the CE at least. so yeha until we get a Nesher/Dagger we can only use what we have.

sorry hecktic week but its not mine to share...

or maybe right, and ED needs to fix the MK and NA series... Its ridiculous to drop 6 MK 84SE 50cm away from a tank and get NO damage... Couple that to the rudimentary damage system for ground units and it becomes very frustrating to use dumb bombs in DCS...

Hopefully FIX the ones that don´t do the correct amount of damage, and not bring the ones model right to the Wrong standard... Very frustrating of attack pilots by the way...

so, is next Patch going back to Wednesdays or will it be Thursday or Friday? Eagerly waiting new airstrips in South Atlantic and different cockpit on my F1...and if you release the MB 339 much better yet...

Very much. Thank you. Very, very appreciated. Sorry guys for being so rude, but you have to listen to peoples opinions without trashing them. I know, we all know, what it feels like to have your air force plane done right in this very hi standard sim. I really appreciate it and value. one or two people might complain for nothing, but if you see quite a bunch of old pilots telling you the same thing, do not dismiss it so fast. Really a huge thanks again. Looking forward to the M in the future, but right now very happy dropping iron with the CE.

why are developers and fans so stubborn? its NOT practical its not useful it does NOT add to immersion to NOT see the cockpit switches in a clickable SIM. Geez, how hard is it to understand? I bet real pilots see in 3D and can tell where a switch IS, in a 2D monitor its harder. Simple as that. Is it going to change in the next update or further down? (Thanks).

Download the A4E mod it does not bite.... And they already announced the Seaking if I am not mistaken... There is also a nice s-2 Tracker mod out there....

Never understood the utility of submarines in DCS there is no ASW modeled nor planes or helicopters to do it with. Surfaced subs are not in their natural state. besides no real damage model to ships nor sensors or weapons that actually work.

Well the Kfir, is a much more potent weapons systems than the Mirage Nesher. Its like to pretending that an M2k with dumb weapons is an MIII. The Finger was finished after the war, so no Finger was deployed in 82. Yes the Kfir could stand in for the Finger since the project was finished with a lot of IAI´s help. Very similar avionics and systems. You would still have a more powerful and reliable engine tho... I truly hope that Razbam delivers a nice Nesher, or MIII CJ or EA or something from the period.

Link is dead, but not even Ed has anounced a patch date.... Maybe you are mistaking the Mythical "two weeks" thingy?

Where did you gte that information? My guess is that MB 339 is next in line for release...

Bump. Pretty please!!! very much needed. Mirage F1 out, Mig 23, F-8, A-7, F-4, comming... We need Air Defenses from the same era, not late 80s and 2000s defenses...

Hello guys.. Maybe I am dumb but I cant find teh scrip for download anywhere... I see the mission but not the script alone, to use in another map. Can you guys point me in the right direction please?