Hobel

Our Viper has exactly lau-88A/A

EHSI show me your monitor layout

track?what tank is it? could be something known that has nothing to do with this here

The Sa-15 should also be able to do this in the M1 version, but I would throw that out there as a strong assumption for now.

To be honest, I didn't know that the TOR /SA-15 in DCS could do that until yesterday. I think this is new. Therefore, I do not know which systems (except for c-ram) can still do that in DCS. But my guess would be that it is close to the real capabilities, so my guess would be that the Gepard can now possibly do that too.

The difference and the main task is that the final result is almost the same on all systems. What's the point of having a perfect result on 3440/1440 if everything above or below it delivers completely different results? so the feedback here is precisely what is being asked for. How does spotting work on different systems

As already mentioned, evidence would be very helpful here. -picture -resolution -graphics settings That would support fine tuning. on other systems you see the dots max to 12-15nm miles so how do you get your 30nm?

Yes, but this has to work for all kinds of resolutions, everyone here has different hardware. The thing certainly still gets fine tuning BTW. It would be helpful if pictures were posted of what distance the dots were actually seen, no feelings of "that might have been 20nm", what resolution And graphic settings, there are many different reports of the new spotting

There are real recordings where the SA-15 shoots at much smaller objects, so a bomb is also a good possibility.

eh? 2 and 3 are basically the same?

Hello would you have example of this? A track or a Youtube video that support your statement?

Hm interesting if that were the case you would not actually have to make an alignment

there are squadrons who were not satisfied with the factory settings and some of them made their own harmonization Basically, the pilots have found out from experience the best Harmonizing for their aircraft, which was then partly adopted by other squadrons. How is this to be evaluated? http://beyourfinest.com/sticking-to-your-guns/

Additionally At some airports, the frequencies are also simply reversed

Die Situation ist halt diese, das KI einheiten und Sensoren immer den Perfekten durchblick durch die Dicksten Wolken haben, du als Human bist blind aber eine Manpad oder auch Flak sieht dich KM weit durch eine Wolke und holt dich runter, ich denke mal das wäre ein möglicher grund das auf schlechtes wetter in diesem Sinne teils noch verzichtet wird.

This was even planned for the dcs KA-50III and there are even pictures of it, but unfortunately certain circumstances have changed and this feature did not make it to our ka-50s

TV Mav no IR MAV Yes

Aus Welchen FLugzeug hast du Die GBU-38 abgeworfen?

you can set your own auto start programs = faster, also I think there is even the possibility to set the necessary switches for the startup so that they are flipped immediately when joining the aircraft

So as far as the INS aspect is concerned, I would say that is there. You can see in the video how I turn off the radar of the Sa-15 immediately after the AGM-88 goes active and turns off, but the AGM-88 continues to turn to the HDG from which the signal came and flies towards it , even though the radar is off.

basically that

i haven't looked at it that closely yet. But BF109 and others had that too, but in the meantime that has been changed and the oil cools down more slowly, I would also say as you would expect. track of it would be cool

Here is all the information you need. In short that the Dcs manual gives automatic 56° max pitch limit and ingame it as far as I can observe 48°. https://forum.dcs.world/topic/286094-question-about-manual-vs-automatic-prop/#comment-4828821

so in your link it's about the AGM-88 going active too early, in the topic here it's about INS`?