Hobel

can you upload a track of the situation, in my test it worked as intended

in the options it should be "target tracking on/off

and not to forget one of the most useful tools in CA... I have watched many tutorials on youtube or elsewhere but for whatever reason no one has mentioned this feature that you can observe in my video. "tracking mode"

This is normal, back when the KA50 handle was introduced there was hardly any news either and it took a long time until you could finally buy it I would guess based on Virpil's past that it will be a good 1 year before we can buy it, but maybe the processes have accelerated in the meantime, who knows, I'm just glad that they make one at all

can you still create a track so that I know what error it is? because there is one that causes some Vikhr to trigger with proxy and as a result of course do no damage to tanks

Fixed

It is about Direct Hits That means to be precise: T80U before the patch took 8% damage from a Blu97. Now 10% BMP-2 before 57% now 71%

Thx! So DCS is spot on

nah, I don't think it was that one, there was another one. But thank you.

Hm. Wasn't there once a topic about the 50cal also having too much drag or something? I can't remember exactly and I can't find the topic right now.

Ohman ansich eigentlich eine mega coole Idee. Aber soweit ich weiß geht das leider nicht.

I have not been able to test it, but can the Planner also enter the Altitude into the PVI-800 through a backdoor, just like the ME does?

hm interesting test. one more note, if you press the active pause and the aircraft was flying at let's say 600km/h from that point on, it should be added to that, at least it is with many other weapons, if it is the same here I can't say for sure. that means there should be a difference between an active pause between say 100km/h or 600km/h.

Basically, it should be related to this and with the transmission it is then not surprising that it is not quite accurate.

In the Russian forum pictures from the manual were posted and these times seem to be correct. also you can see from other post that the fast alignment is not intended for combat operations so 10-20min is the minimum for combat missions. But in the Russian area Dev mentioned that sometime in the future there might be something similar to a prealignment so that you don't have to wait 15-20 minutes for an exact alignment, when that will come nobody knows. GLOSSNASS is not connected to the PVI-800 in our KA-50III so it does not affect the alignment. The alignment is also so long because it is probably (correct me if you like) a part of the system must come to operating temperature.

Sounds like a desync. In sp, the hellfire has absolutely no problems hitting vehicles even when they are travelling at top speed.

Actually, a track would be better. I will also check the whole thing again.

The first time you join there is no problem, only after 2 times it kicks you out because of ic, just restart the game and it works again. This way I can use dice without problems

Some tanks have certain damage dead zones where the damage is absorbed, maybe this happened to you. Do you have a track file from the mission?

This has nothing to do with the actual topic because such things will be implemented sooner or later anyway and pixelated digital zoom is one of them, it has nothing to do with litening or lantirn itself.

Of course, the digital zoom is too perfect but the number of steps is still correct. Such things, however, deviate from the actual topic, otherwise we can also start asking questions why the laser goes through the thickest clouds, which no tgp should actually be able to do, yet they all can, but that is another construction site.

In my opinion with Lantrin, which is older and less capable pod, you don't lose any aspect of a 2007 Viper, since they were using Lantrin after all. We will get Sniper later, and remember Viper is still in EA, and in the future if ED gets access to more info a Litening pod as well. Nevertheless, the f16 equipped with litening is the one with more possibilities and these possibilities are not necessarily unrealistic and that is my point.

What is realistic representation? Is the litening missing a few functions and symbols, yes for sure! But the real task, and that's what it's all about, is to display an image, and as far as I know, important functions like -white/hot -TV -zoom levels -digital zoom -LSS Mostly correctly displayed, so in most cases you can work with it as it is intended for a modern f16c. Is that unrealistic now? On the other hand we have the lantirn which will come with a few limitations and we can no longer fully use some aspects of a 2007 f16. Just my personal opinion

The barometric altimeter actually had an influence on this a few patches ago. This means that if you set the altitude of the target and then enter the coordinates into the pvi-800, the shkval will give you quite close to the target. But this possibility was removed whether it was intentional or happened by mistake I can't say.

Then name at least one thing