Enduro14

Ya been that way since the Shark first came out if memory serves, what the warning is about is that the environmental conditions are that of icing, so its reminding you to switch it on. Now have no clue if thats 100 percent correct but i have always switched it on when i got the message and no issues. If i do not switch it on i know engine icing can happen same with the rotors. Have actually crashed in the caucus mountains due to it. Was many dcs versions ago though....

Yup I think some folks don't understand what all those gauges in the pit are actually used for..... Anyways i said my piece. Hope new stuff comes and cool we can restrict silliness in the mission editor.

I hope ED does a better job of the NVG modeling in SIM. What appears to be coming with the new thermal engine tells me they could definitely do a better nvg presentation. I pray DCS stays a Sim and is not going down the Gamey Stupidity of other platforms. Allot of SME's including myself can bring allot of Valid input on such systems and uses. Please do not open the floodgates of dumbing down Modules with systems that where not apart or used with them. Mission Editor restrictions or not..... I would prefer to fly a module and have to use certain tactics to overcome some technological deficiencies said Airframe had and not have Gamey Aid systems added to alleviate said disadvantages. Keep DCS to its high realistic standard, that's my Dream of this Platform.. MAC needs to satisfy the more relaxed crowd.

Same here noticed in Bunyaps Red Flag Campaign mission 6 i did today. Locked onto Mig 21 and the box was trailing behind just like above screenshot Was in Rift S and have conducted a repair and still get the same.

same issue with me with Rift s, for me its not a left eye or right eye thing its the angle i look at those lights they light and then fade. Odd hard to see in screen shot but move head left or right or up and down and the lights fade in and out

? Performance is night and day better since channel map release. Runs great in oculus but bad in wmr for me

Yup night and day difference for me. Very happy with the direction its going

it relatively works well for me they just need to get the hand size correct and tidbits like that, so those options and hotas disable stuff not here yet.

Did a quick test with leap motion post patch today, no improvements on my end. Tested in the Viper

Yes of course

Absolutely love it, with my eyes it’s very clear and can read and spot things great. I only use oculus software and don’t use any Vr shader mod. Hand controllers in my pit work awesome for flipping switches that not organic to a hotas. My system is 8700k at 5ghz 32 Gsb ram and 1080ti. I run much higher settings than I can in wmr with an odyssey +.

Very much this, shows how much your software aids in the flying of these birds, cant fly without it.

Syria 2015 until present and our Hind is over their operating. With Ispanka's and from looks of it no NVG.... could be wrong as i am not looking on a Red drive anymore

Have to chime in as well, Taking my time through this Campaign and its another absolute hit Bunyap. I did career as ground guy so never did redflag real world but lots of Jrtc's amongst other events. The feeling in this campaign brings me back, hard to describe but it has that feeling down pat. Well done, and I eagerly await more campaigns from you. Take Care.

Yes cant wait to see what the Glorious Hind Receives tomorrow and the Viper....

Funny though how they are being used in syria since 2015...... Jammer that is

The Vr thing for Apache eye piece is just for comfort for VR users. I am right eye dominant and use the right eye projection. Its a comfort thing not a capability thing.... The Dev of the Hind who by the way flew it in combat.... has already confirmed the Hind we have NVG was never a thing, He also Confirmed that the Ir jammer wont be put on because the current Environment in DCS aka weapons modeling, it would be pointless as it was used for older gen Heat seeking missiles. Point is Our hind should not have NVG, in the mean time its optional via the Mission Editor.... Now i personally don't agree we wont get the Ir jammer, As it just forces the mi24 into the modern scenario and not the Russia in Afghanistan Scenario..... So i can concede it seems some developmental time period liberties is happening.... its not the only airframe suffering this.

Well if we are doing period correct aircraft, we should be doing period correct weapon systems and defensive system yes? Especially important for Syria and Afghanistan scenarios but well that's another discussion. From that article as ive never read it, also in regards to the Ispanka Ir jammer, well his answer shows the faults of dcs having no period correct weapon systems in dcs...... Q: Will there be NVGs? A: Not right away. Maybe later, but that would require changing the lighting and textures. We might do it, but no promises. On the actual Mi-24 that’s not a thing.

Seems odd that it has NVG, was actually surprised it did when i first saw it. But what they did do is put the options in the Mission editor to Enable or Disable the feature. Having worn nvg's in vehicles not nvg capable its a blinding experience. But anyways I don't use them in dcs in the Hind. Currently I am more interested if they will add The Ispanka IR jammer as that was on our Hind.....

It’s always a battle between the PK online air quake crowd and those that like the restrictions that are true to the real world. I use to think it’s all sim and this and that, granted I’ve been here since Blackshark beta and never imagined Dcs world would come and have all these awesome modules to fly. It’s interesting, I will say I like realism I did a career in military and that’s how I am programmed, one thing I’ll say is the harm f16 thing I was totally fine with it being restricted as no proof at time showed 4/6 was usable for Harm. Well proof came and now will be recertified for 4/6 harm. Hey fine by me and ED has done a smart thing added the option to restrict load outs. Possibilities are endless with that feature especially online wise. I think what we all run into is, ED is doing this specific airframe from this specific time frame, thus certain capabilities that it has now doesn’t mean it did back then. So the real question is ok is ED going to stick to the Strict year or timeline of said airframe or for instance our hind in real world currently can do Nvg….. and add it as an example. Same could be said for F18 and F16 and on and on. I won’t lie I am a bit confused as to what the exact SOP is currently with DCS modules development and what to add and not add as far as it can do this it can carry this and so on. I imagine it can be optional which for the Hind nvg is optional so you can currently restrict it in the mission editor.

Yes dcs will allocate it all that it deems necessary. This trick made no difference in performance for wmr and OD+. Back to my Rift S....

Ya ever since i heard i think it was fighter pilot podcast with the Viper pilot, saying every landing is different and f16 is hardest thing to land i just go off feel myself as well and do quite well with it. Sure check some numbers but more of a feel thing for me anyways.

Just started campaign myself and loving it. On mission one i just edit the waypoint on the steerpoint page so tgp is ground level. Works well enough.

I have been saying for years we need a full fidelity su25…. All this bling bling tech is cool and all but having the equivalent of the Hog on Red side would be most welcome. Certainly have the maps for it minus Afghanistan also to add we have the Mi8 and Hind now, we need su25 to complete that trio….

Hey just flew this mission other day have to say love it, worked perfectly well for me in latest dcs open beta. I always like doing red flag campaigns in airframes before I go do the down range campaigns.. certainly looking forward to this one.