Enduro14

yup Max zoom and no quality loss and no environmental effects on these systems is Hugely lacking. Hope things get Sim'd better incorporation with the new Thermal engine. Same thing with NVG's hope its a core thing they are working to improve will add allot to the SIM

Yup more environmental effects on optics is greatly needed in dcs....

My eyes spend allot of time behind various pieces of glass, from first gen to modern as of 3 years ago. Granted Groundstuff, and can say the picture that dcs provides right know is way way to good. F14 Lantirn is certainly more inline to how the systems will look. Here's hoping the new thermal engine will allow PID to be much more difficult just like it is in the Real.... What i always did since Blackshark days is set the mfd res to the lowest in settings and that would make it seem more of what i have seen on ground systems

the question that needs to be answered is what settings do you run DCS with a G2 vs Q2. Talking High settings or all these low settings because the res is to high for what hardware and dcs can currently provide right now. Ya high res is nice but it is not nice when the sim is in PS2 settings mode.....

+1000

Well if DCS Mosquito matches what the Real did Guns where harmonized at 350 yards according to research I've done in mean time...

=+10000

make sure vr headset is enabled in dcs under the settings Vr tab

Yup be nice to have DCS full on OpenXR. No issues with my rift s in dcs but wow the overhead when I try to run dcs In WMR and Odyssey +. This piggyback stuff through steam Vr is killing dcs performance.

https://aeroantique.com/products/gyro-horizon-indicator-mk-ic?variant=7647008227358 Ya think some work needs to be done on MK 1-c. Before installation into aircraft it is uncaged via a Screw. Should self level eventually. Although the wording of above link almost makes it seem like you could cage it post install with that screw.... need to go to a museum and ask but then again looking at the pics that silver screw on back i wonder if that is the Uncage screw. If so ya no way in heck to get to that in flight LOL

Rift s doesn't need more sharpening anyway, its very clear on text as is and the Jaggies in game currently would only get worse. If that's even possible....

Thanks for clarification, so is that with the soldiers set to disperse under fire in mission editor? @NineLine

Ya I’m all about early access, but to stop and see how long it’s been since f18 is out and just know almost complete. Some heavy duty modules in systems I. These modules. I will also add love chucks guides, but I will say I grew up on those thick manuals. Sure miss them in the End.

Wags on a youtube reply about this said they the new infantry have been in dcs awhile unless i miss understood him.

I agree, for all aircraft I wish we had a Ratio listing, aka 4 ball to 1 tracer as example....

work in progress damage model, and Us as a ww2 flight sim community have been sensitized to a certain result due to unrealistic damage models in the industry. This isn't a German vs USA thing its a terminal ballistic thing that's a work in progress. I suspect wings will be more prone to detaching from said airframe with ammo belts and fuel explosions. But its the same old crap arguments in every ww2 sim community.

Brings tears of joy to my eyes, she's actually durable

F18 is 20mm Gatling right? Much Higher fire rate and muzzle velocity.... also a bigger shot group as well as intended. Much different than a .50cal Well just read your response again so it cant cut a 109? Well like has been said damage model is work in progress, anyways cutting a wing in half I don't personally believe is a common occurrence , main wing spar are hard and reinforced will take literally a perfect Situation to cut that thing. Now add in a ammo belt or fuel explosion I can see it. Kept my error in reading your post in to add context

.50cal doesn't magically saw things in half. ED's representation is pretty good and as the damage model matures things only get more realistic. Like Nineline has said, wings generally come off an aircraft due to a secondary explosion, weather thats an ammo belt or fuel cell. I imagine once those are added it will be a little more dynamic. ps. I think allot of us, myself included have been misguided in what and how .50cals do via Terminal Ballistics from old ww2 games and sims with not accurate and calculated damage models. Having the experience of using an M2 Allot in the Real glad to see ED making it much more in depth Terminal Ballistic sim on this damage model. Goes without saying, with an armor piercing incendiary round its on the end user to get those rounds on critical structure and parts to do effective damage. Now add in the Flying part.... this generation was the best for a reason....

Dream come true, cant wait!!

Thanks for the work!

Ya pretty cool, but we still don't have the F8 version of the 190......

Shadows reappear with terrain shadows set to Default.

Confirm, todays open beta update still have no shadows from Static objects that I assume are only placed by mission maker Syria instant action mission, Cold start up A10c 2

new infantry in that video????