104th_Crunch

Yes, in a perfect world the 29/33 would be updated. ED have already put more work in to this than originally planned due to customer demand. If they kept at it right now, FC would still take a long while to come out. They need to move on IMO and start work on the next DCS module. While the FC update is excellent and worth every penny to me, we need NEW blood. Yup, 3rd parties can come in and take up some of the work. Would be great.

Looks awesome. Unbelievable amount of work I am sure has gone in to this. The big news is that this will be the release version of FC3! Great, on to DCS F-18! :)

:D

Still a great idea. ROF has this implemented. Need one to as well to give the finger when someone cuts you off on the tarmac :)

Same with in DCS, if you were online and need to type a chat message. There will always be a situation where you need to look at the keyboard. Maybe an onscreen virtual keyboard. Also, an option to blank screen in the Rift by pressing a key so you can see regularly. I imagine though that Trackir/Natural Point must be thinking this a major threat to them.

Your opinion has been expressed by others here before. The last combat F16 study sim was Falcon 4, the last combat F18 and F15 study sims were released by Janes. All these I believe before the year 2000. That was over 12 years ago. There is no mass flood of sims for these that we are sick of sorry. For sure as well none are at the level of an ED DCS release. Eventually, I am sure there will be a F-14 release.

:thumbup:

I think you may have missed the point of why the 104th have went to 2 servers for A2A and A2G. It is because current online stability for FC3 with more than 20 players is bad. Separating A2A and A2G means more people can try to fit in their choice of A2A and A2G. The 104th did not create 2 separate servers to purposely divide A2A and A2G. I really do not like the idea personally, but I can see why it was done. You want to fly A2A and the server is full of A2G. I guess though, if what you are saying, that the A2A server is not busy, then perhaps there is no need for an A2A server. I have been offline for a while and can not confirm that. Hopefully FC3 will return to the days when FC could handle 50+ players with good pings soon! edit: In regard to your comment about a FLOT. It think it is nice to have both options. Not every A2G operation happens on the front line anyway.

Quick forum search http://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=70274&highlight=mig+29+fuel+gauge

Nice work ED to include an option. You guys never rest. Awesome.

Give me a DCS Fighter, and I will never, ever compalin about fighting a FC Fighter! Besides, the beauty of personal servers is that people can design missions and include what ever aircraft they want if they do have an issue.

Relatively easy to have pretty graphics when you don't have to spend time and resources on physics and modeling actual reality.

The Su-33 is great, but it's not to DCS standards, and the F/A-18 has guided A2G. FSX is great as well, but there is no combat at the level of even the current FC/DCS standard. Listen, I want that F/A-18 now damn it. Nothing you're going to type gonna change my mind :)

This scenario is not possible in any modern sim at a DCS level. When a F18 comes out for DCS, hopefully by ED, there will be nothing like it. I can't freakin wait!

Using Trackir, and looking in the mirror is a great way to show off the P51 sim to a friend, and look like a geek at the same time :)

Very cool info, thanks Griffin. I wish though the focus was on fighter aircraft as opposed to bomber crews. Still, I am sure it will be amazing. BoB and Pacific are excellent.

What DCS module, or Flaming Cliffs? Are you using a downloaded profile for the rudders? Did you install CH Manager software, or just plugged in the pedals with no CH Software?

This should help http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=1637714&postcount=7

If we keep asking for more and more in FC, when will ED ever have the time to work on the next DCS release? There are a million things FC3 could use. You gotta draw the line somewhere I think. On the other hand, with the F15 and Su27 high detail cockpits in place, why not go all out and them both to the level of DCS :)

Not to mention the original starting post of that thread is dated 07-19-2010 :cry:

If you are using force feedback, swap axes in the FF tune panel in the control settings.

Loss in translation I believe. Here is the google translation http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=ru&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&eotf=1&u=http%3A%2F%2Fizvestia.ru%2Fnews%2F541639&act=url

I guess they are doing what they need to make money, and that is important. I personally have no interest in anything like this. I enjoy simulations to be simulations, and arcade games to be arcade games, and not mix the 2. I wish them best of luck though. I just hope work continues on DCS Fighter and this is not slowing them down.

You mean, "Houston, we've had a problem here." :)

One other thing. If you are in a RUS jet, than you can use the RWR to get the distance of an active missile tracking you pretty accurately. For ex. you can wait until there is 2 bars left on the RWR to light up before preforming the roll.