Kang

While probably an interesting map, my memory of virtually all forum discussions lightly touching the subject - from world news to the supposedly harmless topic of aircraft inventories - requiring tremendous moderation efforts, it's probably not a very good idea.

Bit of a solution, mayhaps: have custom kneeboard pages (or an actual piece of paper if you aren't insisting on being VR only) that you write yourself a few pointers on. Previous posts are entirely right about start-up being the easy part for many modules, especially the more modern ones, and plenty of other things coming after.

I've previously built a mission that had a song playing on a radio station. Also, I hear the Viggen has a built-in cassette player in DCS?

Well, technically it turns the plane over to the AI irreversibly. In other words, you can't rearm and go up again. Might as well just end the mission.

If you know their set-up position well enough, you can throw a GBU-38 at their radar station and be done.

According to parts of this community: yes, precisely. Wait until the issues have filtered down to 'stable' branch and then report them.

I can't remember, are the net group settings adjusted automatically when setting up two A-10s in the same group through ME?

Good point actually, it is so slow that you definitely don't want to use it anymore when things fly in your direction already. I meant it more like a 'settle into semi-cover' in preparation for an attack kind of thing.

Without wanting to take a thing away from it, because it is a nice new feature indeed, there is probably a bit of documentation beyond public wikipedia lying around at ED somewhere anyway and service dates should be comparably easy to look up. It's just a matter of having one or two employees have the time to go through them and compile a list.

Perhaps not wanted, but since the changelog actually points towards it, it is known for sure. Probably necessary.

The customary 'when will there ever be a sale' thread literally in the week after a sale.

With the Shark in an autopilot assisted hover you can flip and hold the switch to 'descend' in order to move straight down slowly. Great for ducking behind cover and the like. The switch going back to neutral as soon as you let go is normal and intended.

[Later in Early Access]?

The warehouses pointed out in the image Paganus shared are part of the mission, not of the scenery. In other words: got to place your own.

It definitely should work, as far as I can tell.

Original A-10C seat moved as well, just saying.

The ship of having something like a 'planeset' that is in any shape way or form consistent to form a scenario that could be played from various sides, has sailed a long, long, long time ago, got lost in the Bermuda Triangle, mysteriously re-appeared in port, had the fate of its crew investigated, the insurance sum paid, has been scrapped for metal, the metal re-used for cooking utensils and several of these lost when friends helped moving house since.

Not without some changes, as of now it is directly linked to the wing pylons themselves.

No no no, it was stated that it was being handled by the fixed-wing team, that means something entirely different.

Thanks for clearing that up, I kind of missed out on the wording there.

This whole problem could be avoided if the timeframe for sales in ED's shop and Steam were a bit more synced. I get it that Steam seems to impose certain rules on these things. Or perhaps actually put in both relevant dates in each of the publications. I remember people on Steam usually get riled up quite badly if they get the newsletter displayed and it has information not relevant to the Steam version. So, at the end of the day, somebody is going to be miffed either way anyway.

You aren't doing anything wrong. It should work like that, even without the 'hook cargo command', just hovering above the cargo should prompt a message and an auto-hookup. The fact that the red marker smoke appears correctly is evidence the cargo is set up correctly. Only thing I can think of is checking the rope length on the Huey in the ME, perhaps it's set to something too short?

Well, it's not like NATO developed these things to go plinking tanks with them. The Soviet Union probably gets a bit of a raw deal in these discussions because it frankly ceased to be in the early 90s. It's easy to forget that, while the options were there, at that time most Hornets and Tomcats and whatnot were also throwing iron bombs at their targets mostly.

The 'wreckage should be an object of some sort' issue definitely has merit. If you use just 'ambient civilians', they go through anything and don't care. They drive through actively fighting units as well. But I can see that it should be a thing for placed unit civilians that actually do have AI. In related news, it would also be good if AI truck drivers would not drive into burning (but still 'alive') vehicles either, because that can lead to interestingly stupid chain reactions if you hit just the lead vehicle of a convoy.

So, apparently this is a serious wishlist thread now, all of a sudden. Can someone from ED make a quick post on which of this modest list of aircraft mentioned can actually be expected in the future?