Hulkbust44

Just set the programs the way you want in the files, passes IC too. Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Our Hornet is missing *a lot* question is how much documentation does ED have. My guess is this next one will be castle forward twice to toggle EMCON. Who knows, they could give us radar Azimuth bump, of SA format range bump via TDC. Could be TDC selectable options for the SA and attack formats. (Have some for A/A radar but not all) https://r.tapatalk.com/shareLink/topic?url=https://forums.eagle.ru/topic/262863-hotas-fuctionalities/&share_tid=262863&share_fid=74365&share_type=t&link_source=app Previous discussion on this from more knowledgeable people than me.... Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Well if it's skimming it's because it found something to attack. There's a chance that right off the rail it found something and went to the deck for it's terminal phase. All sounds like correct behavior to me. Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

I was able to reproduce the frozen/lack of stores issue by taxiing before rearm complete with the weapon visible. Driving away from refueling only did not yield the same result. Once I took off only the complete system reboot via toggling the generators made the stores system function. (I attempted MC 2) Here's the track for all of this. Note the 30 second freeze when the rearm menu is cued the first time. Incomplete_rearm.trk

That would be it, you've got to wait until the ground crew says it's complete even if you see the weapons on the pylons. Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

This generally occurs if you taxi before the ground crew has completed rearming. Basically it's as if the stores system does not know what weapons are loaded, in the A-10 we see this denoted by the red station boxes on the DSMS. In the Hornet it seems that the system just gets confused and freezes. To remedy this if/when it occurs, I re-cycle MC 2 with the switch in the back left and that seems to force a rescan of the pylons by the stores system. Sometimes this doesn't work and I fall back on cycling the left and right generators to force the systems to restart. It seems that occasionally if you taxi "before rearming complete" there is no "Hey, what are you doing?!" and you don't realize the issue until airborne. Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

I love the double ugly. You "get" a full pylon back that can mount any weapons the aircraft can carry (aside from AGM-62 there) compared to the centerline pod where you only get one AAM cheek station. Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Because pausing is unrealistic and this is a simulator/s (for those who need it) Pause should be in the UI layer controls. Escape will also "pause" if you need it. Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Hope not, it should be the other way around. No airframe should be able to change the codes of Paveway IIs in the cockpit. (aside from kneeboard or something for the ground crew) Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Nope, AI will break and chaff as soon as a FOX 3 comes off the rail, and they will flare a FOX 2 shot even if you launched from directly underneath where it would be impossible to see you... Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

If this is against AI, it's an AI issue not a Hornet issue, they know too much. Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Actually the video does. The HACQ circle would be flashing if he was looking outside of gimbal limits. Furthermore, the JHMCS tells us his current heading, and the bearing of his current LOS. Aircraft heading: 210°, LOS bearing: 156° the difference is 54°, so still within gimbal limits by the numbers. Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

+1 This definitely needs to be looked at. Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Uh, well then... that's interesting... Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Probably the only decent vid GR produced...(I know I know) Data/feedback from ED Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

That we know of, ED doesn't exactly announce everything in the change log. Such as Viper VRP, PUP etc I learned this was implimented a few patches ago and don't remember any mention in the notes. I just saw a video in it today. Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Has anyone tested this in 2.7 yet? Like Hammer said before, the Hornet may be better on paper, and I've yet to see it perform as such in game. I've had the Hornet almost since release and of course it's a great fighter, just haven't seen it outrate a Viper in practice. Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

You're not using the game mode controls setup by mistake are you? Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

TOO shouldn't loft unless something was just changed. PB should loft, and PLBK will just get there by any means necessary... Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Well, he then fails to do just a few minutes later. I refuse to believe that the DCS Hornet is out-rating the Viper until I see it myself with the numbers. Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Cool, got it now. Good info Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Sorry, what am I looking at? Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Exactly. It's all anecdotal "Viper is the best 2C aircraft period!" and you can't do rate "tests" fighting another aircraft, too many variables. I'm going to try each aircraft at their best rate speeds (separately) and see what turn rate results I get. Personally I've never won a rate fight against a proficient 16 pilot, nor have I out-rated a 16 in my Hornet against a proficient pilot. What we really need is real world tests knowing all the Variables. Sure a Hornet you merged with on GS beat you 2C, but because he was Winchester and running on fumes. Idk, I'll test tonight. Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

Say for a second that we believe you, how/why do you know this? Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

When you are trying to move the handle again are you pulling it out (mouse scroll aft) first? I have no clue what's going on with the rest though. Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk