Hulkbust44

Can you press num 5 to reset the view? Mobius708

Well the ACM modes are taking priority here, as they should. Yes, it is annoying. SCS right in ACM doesn't have a function so FLIR to right DDI should work. Mobius708

Ah, I should've actually looked at it lol. Just downloaded it now. In that case, two things I would also mention are the NWS FLIR SP via NWS twice again, and the weapons select switch towards the selected weapon will step the station. Real useful for the 9X. These are really awesome. You should link it in the Hornet resources channel of the TDCS discord. Mobius708

TA: yes MSI: yes Just a few days ago ED moved the thread of missing MSI functions from "wishlist" to "reported" bugs. Looks like an MSI rework might be coming soon, it really is needed. Mobius708

This looks fantastic. Great job! One thing I would add is TDC depress long for SPOT as this is an important RWS function. Are you planning on doing ACM modes or the AZ/EL format as well? I'm asking about those specifically as they are still part of the radar. Mobius708

The numbers I saw for the Hornet and Viper radar's output was 1,800 and 800 watts respectively. By raw numbers the Hornet radar is 44% more powerful. Now again that doesn't have a perfect linear relationship with detection range. Mobius708

Why do you believe it would only be a slight advantage, in reference to radar range? Mobius708

Can the 68 in the Viper even change the PRF? Im sure it can, but can the pilot control it? On a whim in discord someone mentioned the 16+68 could only use a medium PRF. Mobius708

Yep, hopefully this gets tweaked with the TDC slew rate as well. Mobius708

No issue there. With an STT the range scale would automatically be changed, it just shouldn't be STTing like this...

Known bug already reported. Edit: at least the ACM mode issue are, haven't heard of issues with AACQ yet. Mobius708

I might be nitpicking here but there is no "ready" indication for any BIT test. When no failures have been detected for a certain system it will display "GO" at the beginning NOT RDY will be displayed. I just did a cold start (my abridged version) then messed around with some of the BIT pages to see what works and what's WIP. In my track I did not receive an "GO"s until the FCS bit was completed. Any chance you could try to replicate and share your track? startup_BIT.trk

With realistic TDC disabled selecting an EXP sub-level will not allow the EXP scan zone to be slewed unless TDC depress is held. This logic would make sense if there was a TDC cursor as well with this sub-level however there is not one in DCS. Either a yellow TDC cursor is missing in the undesignated EXP sub-level, or the slew function with realistic TDC slew disabled is bugged. I demonstrate this in the track. Hope someone can look into this. AGR_EXP_TDC.trk

Well yes there is. As of 2.7.1 "TDC cursor added for EXP mode." So you still have the issue of the two cursors that would be competing. Disregard. I just test for my self. I now understand what you are saying, however I think it's reasonable that there is a TDC cursor missing in the selected EXP mode for search. I highly highly doubt that there's no TDC cursor there as you can't to anything with the format now until you designate or undesignate something. You would expect the same logic to carry through. It could be that the logic really is correct as ED has tagged, but is still missing a TDC cursor for that sublevel. I will start my own thread specifically with this inquiry and see what response I get. Mobius708

Yeah, just look at the 16s clusterf*ck of avionics they crammed in to "make it work." Mobius708

As said below, is SEQ1 boxed? Are there any waypoints in your sequence? HSI-DATA-WYPT will display the waypoints by number that are in the current sequence. If you have have none, you needed to then go to SEQUFC in on the WYPT sublevel. UFC will display options. Hit INS for insert and type the waypoint number, enter. Repeat for all that you want in the sequence. (DEL= delete TGT= target for TOT TOT=time on target programing.) Mobius708

After initializing the BIT as part of startup? Mobius708

I'm just say that since there's not a "gamey" function that there's nothing to restrict. Mobius708

No, and why would that be a thing? It's not like the IL-2 autolevel cheat is a thing in DCS. Mobius708

Just note that current open beta is 2.7.1 and 2.5 was a while back... Mobius708

That's about half my issue with GR... Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

For chaff I have found that a burst of three with a .25 second interval works great for me. Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk

https://r.tapatalk.com/shareLink/topic?url=https://forums.eagle.ru/topic/271806-range-marker-on-nird-circle-barely-visible/&share_tid=271806&share_fid=74365&share_type=t&link_source=app

Thanks, I misread your post and forgot what pod TINS was...

Wait, this is contradictory to what you were previously saying. Now you are saying that we should have x because it was added later and the 2005/2007 Hornet is the "minimum"? Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk