Vitormouraa Posted May 5, 2017 Posted May 5, 2017 Yea i thought carriers would need updating to. That's very true.. we need a new 3D model and textures for the Kuznetsov! Look how beautiful it looks: I'm not sure why they haven't released it yet. Anyway, back to the topic, Su-33 with its new PFM, definitely needs an updated Kuznetsov. SplashOneGaming Discord https://splashonegaming.com
kobeshow Posted May 5, 2017 Posted May 5, 2017 That's very true.. we need a new 3D model and textures for the Kuznetsov! Look how beautiful it looks: I think they need some more time to remove that flag aft of the boat, that looks dangerous :D 1 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] "DCS World is the main public build, it has nothing to do with being stable" -Bignewy
Esac_mirmidon Posted May 5, 2017 Posted May 5, 2017 This flag? XDD " You must think in russian.." [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Windows 7 Home Premium-Intel 2500K OC 4.6-SSD Samsung EVO 860- MSI GTX 1080 - 16G RAM - 1920x1080 27´ Hotas Rhino X-55-MFG Crosswind Rudder Pedals -Track IR 4
Vitormouraa Posted May 5, 2017 Posted May 5, 2017 I didn't notice that flag before lol SplashOneGaming Discord https://splashonegaming.com
frixon28 Posted May 5, 2017 Posted May 5, 2017 I'll see if I can poke the hive on the PFMs for the remaining FC3 aircraft. I would think with the carriers eventually coming the PFM for the Su-33 would be important. Thank you. I was thinking the same thing about the PFM of the Su-33 being important with the next few modules coming out.
ED Team NineLine Posted May 5, 2017 ED Team Posted May 5, 2017 Thank you. I was thinking the same thing about the PFM of the Su-33 being important with the next few modules coming out. Yeah, that isnt official from me, but as I understood it, PFM aircraft dont interact with the old carriers correctly, if they were to update the Su-33 without the carriers it could break carrier ops for that aircraft, least that is my guess. I could be way off too :) Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug**
Drona Posted May 5, 2017 Posted May 5, 2017 Come on ED, the PFM for the Su-33 is just taking too long. I know you can't please everyone, every time, I understand that, but honestly, this is taking too long! At least some news on progress would be appreciated!
Pocket Sized Posted May 5, 2017 Posted May 5, 2017 PFM aircraft dont interact with the old carriers correctly Can confirm (on the Kuznetsov) F-15/Su-27 explode upon reaching the center point of the carrier (even if your wheels are a few feet above it) Su-25T/A have a weird bug involving the ramp that makes their wheels pop when going back down onto the main deck. Most other aircraft are OK, if I remember correctly. DCS modules are built up to a spec, not down to a schedule. In order to utilize a system to your advantage, you must know how it works.
ED Team NineLine Posted May 8, 2017 ED Team Posted May 8, 2017 Ok guys, I dont have a lot of info, but I can tell you the Su-33 PFM is currently in progress. Sorry I cant give you more, but I would imagine we will here more soon. Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug**
Pocket Sized Posted May 8, 2017 Posted May 8, 2017 Yay! DCS modules are built up to a spec, not down to a schedule. In order to utilize a system to your advantage, you must know how it works.
WildBillKelsoe Posted May 8, 2017 Posted May 8, 2017 I could be way off too :) well it follows logic that a carrier craft can not be looked at first without upgrading its mothership to include pitching decks, etc... It even follows more logic that Wags signature says "more news on F/A-18 when Normandy gets done". AWAITING ED NEW DAMAGE MODEL IMPLEMENTATION FOR WW2 BIRDS Fat T is above, thin T is below. Long T is faster, Short T is slower. Open triangle is AWACS, closed triangle is your own sensors. Double dash is friendly, Single dash is enemy. Circle is friendly. Strobe is jammer. Strobe to dash is under 35 km. HDD is 7 times range key. Radar to 160 km, IRST to 10 km. Stay low, but never slow.
Weta43 Posted May 8, 2017 Posted May 8, 2017 Slightly OT, but the decks already pitch if you change the sea state. Cheers.
Winston 60 Posted May 10, 2017 Posted May 10, 2017 How does one "change the sea state" ? CPU: i7 980x @ 4.2GHz RAM: 24gb Corsair Vengeance MB: Gigabyte Sniper X58 w/onboard Soundblaster X-Fi HD: SanDisk 480gb SSD OS: Win7 Pro 64bit VIDEO CARD: EVGA GTX 980ti FTW MONITOR: LG 34" Ultrawide 2560x1080 MP SERVER: ibuypower i7-4810MQ w/Win7 Home 64bit GEAR: Saitek X-52 Pro; Combat Rudder Pedals; Throttle Quadrants. Thrustmaster MFD's, TrackIR 5 w/Pro Clip, Turtle Beach X-12 Headset
ED Team NineLine Posted May 10, 2017 ED Team Posted May 10, 2017 Increase the wind Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug**
Pocket Sized Posted May 19, 2017 Posted May 19, 2017 Su-33 banner ;) DCS modules are built up to a spec, not down to a schedule. In order to utilize a system to your advantage, you must know how it works.
JazonXD Posted May 20, 2017 Posted May 20, 2017 Su-33 banner ;) Lol as soon as I saw it, I came to the FC3 section to see if anyone noticed... sure enough... AMD 5600X -- Gigabyte RTX 3070 Vision -- 32GB 3600MHz DDR4 -- HP Reverb G2 -- Logitech 3D Extreme Pro -- Thrustmaster TWCS BRRRT! Car and aviation enthusiast, gun nut and computer nerd!
Hueyman Posted May 20, 2017 Posted May 20, 2017 Same here, directly came here to check ... ED never do this kind of thing without any clever hint, so we might be getting new Su-33 FM in the coming 6 years I assume ;-) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] CPL(A)IR ME/SEP/MEP/SET - CPL(H)
=OPS=Slider Posted May 20, 2017 Posted May 20, 2017 We had MiG-29 banner for some time as well, and nothing happened... I've lost my faith long time ago.
Sryan Posted May 20, 2017 Posted May 20, 2017 We had MiG-29 banner for some time as well, and nothing happened... I've lost my faith long time ago. We had the Fulcrum banner last year, and that has received some great 3D model upgrades over the past year for a number of its variants. Who knows what the Su-33 banner may hint at. I believe it has been said the Flanker-D PFM would come before the Fulcrum PFM. Check my F-15C guide
OnlyforDCS Posted May 20, 2017 Posted May 20, 2017 I don't fly the Su-33 or the Mig29 because there is no PFM. I have absolutely zero interest in flying SFM aircraft. I would like to though. The Su33 in combination with carrier operations would probably be a blast. The Fulcrum is my favorite Soviet designed and built fighter aircraft. Current specs: Windows 10 Home 64bit, i5-9600K @ 3.7 Ghz, 32GB DDR4 RAM, 1TB Samsung EVO 860 M.2 SSD, GAINWARD RTX2060 6GB, Oculus Rift S, MS FFB2 Sidewinder + Warthog Throttle Quadrant, Saitek Pro rudder pedals.
Texac Posted May 20, 2017 Posted May 20, 2017 (edited) There were already small additions to the Su-33 flight model such as the Cobra maneuver. I don't know how someone can lose faith if it is noticeable that they are defenitaly working on it. Edited May 20, 2017 by Texac - My Skins/Liveries - Improved F-16C Texture Template • Texac on YouTube •
probad Posted May 20, 2017 Posted May 20, 2017 because people have figured out threats like "losing faith in" and "wont purchase any more of" are simple tricks to extort devs into providing some instant gratification. it doesnt help anyone in the end though, devs dont get any money out of it and we don't get the product any sooner.
Pocket Sized Posted May 23, 2017 Posted May 23, 2017 Does anyone know about the specific differences between the Su-27 and 33? I can't help but wonder if the canards make the aircraft less stable, or if they compensate for a further aft CoL caused by the larger wing. DCS modules are built up to a spec, not down to a schedule. In order to utilize a system to your advantage, you must know how it works.
schroedi Posted May 23, 2017 Posted May 23, 2017 Su-33 can fly slower and is more stable at slow speeds.
Recommended Posts