DCS: F-16C Block 50 by EDSA

[FlankerMan]

As I said in another thread, the F-16DJ Block 50D would fix everything, as it's multi-crew, SEAD-capable, and it's an F-16. Plus, it's a later block with a GE engine.

[*Rage*]

Years ago Wags mentioned that if they did an F16 it would be an F16CJ which would make it a block 50/52. Hopefully that's still the case.

[Esac_mirmidon]

Block 50/52 is perfect for me.

[gianlu320]

Yes

Block 50/52 please

[Rangi]

It is such good news, we get a very interesting jet that is used by many different countries (assuming the exact varient is acceptable as a stand in for so many different modifications out there). Most of all I am happy that one in twenty threads won't be derailed into F-16 wishlists. Let the release date betting begin, my pick is sometime in early 2021.

[David OC]

Not sure exact model ED will go for? I think their not sure just like the F/A-18, it will work itself out once all the info has been gone through and sorted out.

 

Where DCS / ED is right now, especially now with the F/A-18 systems, general ground radar tech, soon to be tweaked for the F/A-18 ground radar.

 

I don't think the turnaround time will be far off for this module, 3D model is done I believe, I'm guessing they will be using some of the DCS F16 demo FM? Or the same source data from NASA for flight model and engines. (Extrapolated equations from the NASA manned sim)

 

So depending on team workloads for other projects? Late 2019, I hope.:D

 

.

[Ala12Rv-watermanpc]

O M G!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

 

 

 

 

[beppe_goodoldrebel]

I hope in a Block 40 or Block 50/52.

 

With the Syria map incoming maybe even some Isreali version :-)

[Buckeye]

I hope it's a more modern variant with either the PW-229s or GE-100/129.

 

+1 :thumbup:

[Vitormouraa]

I hope it's a more modern variant with either the PW-229s or GE-100/129.

 

I'd rather the GE engine.

 

Higher airflow, higher propulsive efficiency. Better at low/slow.

[Pilotasso]

Agree, those things are rocketships

[mvsgas]

Please don't do the C model, a D would be much better. You can do everything in singleplayer like in the C but it opens a new world for coop online flying. A F-16D with terrain following could be used like a mini F-15E.

 

As I said in another thread, the F-16DJ Block 50D would fix everything, as it's multi-crew, SEAD-capable, and it's an F-16. Plus, it's a later block with a GE engine.

 

Keep in mind that most D models are made for training. So MFD/CMFD just mirror each other. Also, many lack the Aft Seat HUD Monitor (ASHM)

 

So no HUD information unless you use one of only two MFD/CMFD.

Finally, D models carry less fuel that C models.

 

AFAIK, the only "multicrew" F-16 ( as in both pilots can use different MFD/CMFD and work together to strike a target) is the F-16I Block 52+ and Singapore block 52+. The easiest way to identify these are looking for the large bulges on the nose.

Edited August 9, 2018 by mvsgas
1.16

[FlankerMan]

I've seen pictures of Ds with combat loads, and I know that they are used, just not as often. By the way, how exactly do multi-seat aircraft work in single player? I don't have any, so I'm wondering if you get to decide which seat you're in, and what the skill level of the AI in the same aircraft is.

[mvsgas]

I've seen pictures of Ds with combat loads, and I know that they are used, just not as often.

Absolutely, as a matter of fact, the first USAF AIM-120 kill was with an F-16D (90-0778)

From F-16.net

The only reason for it flying the combat mission (4 Hours) that day was to take flying hours off it so it could go in for a phase inspection. Most of its flight time during Operation Southern Watch was (FAM) rides for in coming pilots and VIP's, being the only D model. The canopy was so bad that Lt. Col North (at that time) stated "it was like landing with a paper bag on your head.

But there was nobody on the back seat AFAIK.

[BeastyBaiter]

I wouldn't buy a two seater. Two seat fighters are a deal breaker for me (bombers/strikers/choppers are different of course). This is doubly true with the F-16 where you gain nothing from the second seat but get reduced rearward visibility, extra weight and less fuel. This is all moot though, I'm not convinced an F-16 is in the pipe. I've seen trailers for DCS advertising the OH-58 as an upcoming flyable too. It's about 4 years old and nobody is working on it as far as I know.

[Svend_Dellepude]

F-16!!!!!!! :D

That'll be the day!!! :pilotfly:

[rjetster1]

Yes... that will be the day alright!!! That will be a good day!!! Show your optimism!

[*Rage*]

I wouldn't buy a 2 seater fighter either.

[Oceandar]

I don't like F-16D idea. Multiplayer? I rarely see players play together in one Gazelle in MP in any server.

[StandingCow]

I don't like F-16D idea. Multiplayer? I rarely see players play together in one Gazelle in MP in any server.

 

Big difference between that and a jet like the F14 and F16D. You would see a lot more people in MP twin seats once they come out.

[NineLine]

The cool thing is this argument already seems to be solved as ED is doing the F-16C ;)

[Vitormouraa]

The cool thing is this argument already seems to be solved as ED is doing the F-16C ;)

 

Yeah internet being internet...

[Buzzles]

Yeah internet being internet...

 

It's the same thing some of us mentioned in the many, many wishlists:

 

You'll never please everyone as it isn't their F-16.

 

 

The forum will be...fun?...when ED announce the block they've chosen.

Edited April 10, 2018 by Buzzles
Spelling

[kontiuka]

The forum will be...fun?...

Ya. Hopefully, people will be mature enough ... wait .. what am I saying?

[Pikey]

I believe the popularity of an F-16 is down to the long list of export countries which does mean it fits into so many scenarios in a sandbox. If it's a C then I guess people will crow over the 50/52 for the '91 HARM addition. It will be nice when done, I wonder if the work on F-18 helps improve speed. I hope they dont have research delays like the Hornet.