Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Wondering if the F-15C would/could ever become a hifi module? I understand security boundaries, but if ED can make an FA-18C, why the hell cant an F-15C? Both are retired/retiring from USAF/USN.

 

Also, would you buy it? I most certainly would, and I already have FC version.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Win 10, AMD FX9590/water cooled, 32GB RAM, 250GB SSD system, 1TB SSD (DCS installed), 2TB HD, Warthog HOTAS, MFG rudders, Track IR 5, LG Ultrawide, Logitech Speakers w/sub, Fans, Case, cell phone, wallet, keys.....printer

  • Replies 100
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

because the AN/APG-68 radar is still classified.

AWAITING ED NEW DAMAGE MODEL IMPLEMENTATION FOR WW2 BIRDS

 

Fat T is above, thin T is below. Long T is faster, Short T is slower. Open triangle is AWACS, closed triangle is your own sensors. Double dash is friendly, Single dash is enemy. Circle is friendly. Strobe is jammer. Strobe to dash is under 35 km. HDD is 7 times range key. Radar to 160 km, IRST to 10 km. Stay low, but never slow.

Posted
because the AN/APG-68 radar is still classified.

 

 

 

Ah. That makes sense. Thank you.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Win 10, AMD FX9590/water cooled, 32GB RAM, 250GB SSD system, 1TB SSD (DCS installed), 2TB HD, Warthog HOTAS, MFG rudders, Track IR 5, LG Ultrawide, Logitech Speakers w/sub, Fans, Case, cell phone, wallet, keys.....printer

Posted (edited)

There is an F-15E in dev right now.

 

@WildBill

Classification is irrelevant. F-18 and A-10 also have classified aspects.

 

 

 

I really don't know why people pull that sort of stuff out of their butt. It's completely illogical if you think about it for even two seconds.

Edited by zhukov032186

Де вороги, знайдуться козаки їх перемогти.

5800x3d * 3090 * 64gb * Reverb G2

Posted (edited)

F-15C v3.0??

 

There is an F-15E in dev right now.

 

@WildBill

Classification is irrelevant. F-18 and A-10 also have classified aspects.

 

 

 

I really don't know why people pull that sort of stuff out of their butt. It's completely illogical if you think about it for even two seconds.

 

 

 

Yeah, but the radar for the 15C is a very big key in the airframe. I doubt ED would develop this just to cut corners on something so interweaved into the aircraft weapon systems.

 

Also it’s a different radar. Wait.... no it’s not. At least when it was developed it was the same radar. Developed APG-63. Now APG-70.

 

I withdraw my statement. They could still make a hifi version of the FC3 model.

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Edited by Eagle7907

Win 10, AMD FX9590/water cooled, 32GB RAM, 250GB SSD system, 1TB SSD (DCS installed), 2TB HD, Warthog HOTAS, MFG rudders, Track IR 5, LG Ultrawide, Logitech Speakers w/sub, Fans, Case, cell phone, wallet, keys.....printer

Posted (edited)

It's APG-63 modeled currently.

 

And, yes, I would love full fidelity F-15C. I'm not into Strike Eagle that much.

Edited by draconus

🖥️ Win10  i7-10700KF  32GB  RTX4070S   🥽 Quest 3   🕹️ T16000M  VPC CDT-VMAX  TFRP   ✈️ FC3  F-14A/B  F-15E   ⚙️ CA   🚢 SC   🌐 NTTR  PG  Syria

Posted

@eagle

Radar is extremely simplified ingame at present. It's ALREADY 'corner cut'. That said, classification is irrelevant, I repeat. The way that sort of thing works is you produce something with similar results that generates them in a different manner. That's what they do on all the OTHER classified systems on these active duty aircraft we ALREADY have.

 

These are NOT 1 to 1 replicas of the real aircraft, there are countless compromises made on each of them.

Де вороги, знайдуться козаки їх перемогти.

5800x3d * 3090 * 64gb * Reverb G2

Posted

I would certainly like to see a more functional F-15C. You don't need to simulate every single system but I'd like to see more interaction with the cockpit. Also, give the F-15 the AIM-9X and JHMCS. :D

F/A-18C; A-10C; F-14B; Mirage 2000C; A-4E; F-16C; Flaming Cliffs 3

Posted
@eagle

Radar is extremely simplified ingame at present. It's ALREADY 'corner cut'. That said, classification is irrelevant, I repeat. The way that sort of thing works is you produce something with similar results that generates them in a different manner. That's what they do on all the OTHER classified systems on these active duty aircraft we ALREADY have.

 

These are NOT 1 to 1 replicas of the real aircraft, there are countless compromises made on each of them.

 

 

 

Yeah I came to that conclusion after the fact. I guess you didn’t see me say I withdrew my statement. Obviously it wasn’t the case since it is already using APG-63 in the sim.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Win 10, AMD FX9590/water cooled, 32GB RAM, 250GB SSD system, 1TB SSD (DCS installed), 2TB HD, Warthog HOTAS, MFG rudders, Track IR 5, LG Ultrawide, Logitech Speakers w/sub, Fans, Case, cell phone, wallet, keys.....printer

Posted

A full advanced F-15C module from ED would be a first day buy on prelaunch. I would buy from any 3rd party also but not a prelaunch buy there. There is already buttons and knobs that move when you press the key combination for them. For instance the fuel knob.

Posted

they most certainly should - we need all of the teen models

 

 

 

and for sure.. they should indeed try their very best to "simulate every single system" (as much as possible - i'm aware the A-10 and F-18 haven't modeled every system either - you get what i mean...)

i7-4790K | Asus Sabertooth Z97 MkI | 16Gb DDR3 | EVGA GTX 980 | TM Warthog | MFG Crosswind | Panasonic TC-58AX800U

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted (edited)

‘Eagle upgraded to full module’ was on the unofficial roadmap for a few years, wasn’t it? Am I misremembering that or was it removed? Didn’t a forum member also find that all of the cockpit switches were actually animated, but the animations aren’t enabled in-game? There was speculation at that time that behind the scenes work was being done to bring the Eagle up to full module standard. Again this was all like 5+ years ago.

It’d be an instant purchase for me too but I’m also not holding my breath.

 

Edit: Found the cockpit animations.

Edited by SonofEil

i7 7700K @5.0, 1080Ti, 32GB DDR4, HMD Odyssey, TM WH, Crosswind Rudder...

Posted (edited)

F-15C and F-15E use AN/APG-63/70 radar family. AN/APG-63(V)3 is latest generation AESA radar for F-15C and F-15SG (Singapore).

 

-68 family is F-16C/D radar.

 

Both have AESA upgrades. Very likely all active F-15C have -(V) AESA upgraded 63/70 radars, and most of Air National Guard.

 

US doctrine uses ANG F-15C and F-16C/D squadrons for air sovereignty , air police role, DCA and training US, NATO, and allied crews . While active squadrons are organized under expeditionary wings for rapid deployment. Their training emphasizes OCA and air dominance DCA missions.

ANG and Active USAF F-15E train for air-ground mission with secondary OCA and DCA roles for self-escort and air policing.

 

All of those sets are classified. I would be surprised if current radar model of F-15C in DCS is later then 1979, and most of that performance is estimated.

Edited by DmitriKozlowsky
Posted (edited)

F-15C v3.0??

 

‘Eagle upgraded to full module’ was on the unofficial roadmap for a few years, wasn’t it? Am I misremembering that or was it removed? Didn’t a forum member also find that all of the cockpit switches were actually animated, but the animations aren’t enabled in-game? There was speculation at that time that behind the scenes work was being done to bring the Eagle up to full module standard. Again this was all like 5+ years ago.

It’d be an instant purchase for me too but I’m also not holding my breath.

 

Edit: Found the cockpit animations.

 

 

 

Now this is disappointing. With all the animations made, to me that says they hit some sort of road block to finish it. Me thinks there is a greater power stopping ED. That’s like stopping halfway to paint a masterpiece.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

Edited by Eagle7907

Win 10, AMD FX9590/water cooled, 32GB RAM, 250GB SSD system, 1TB SSD (DCS installed), 2TB HD, Warthog HOTAS, MFG rudders, Track IR 5, LG Ultrawide, Logitech Speakers w/sub, Fans, Case, cell phone, wallet, keys.....printer

Posted
There is an F-15E in dev right now.

 

Makes me wet dreams...do you have any more facts and information about that?

Brrrrrrrrrrrt

I'd rather call in a Strike Eagle...

I7 6700K, MSI Z270 Gaming Pro Carbon, 32GB G.Skill Ripjaw V 3200, Inno3D GTX 1080, Samsung 970 Evo, Thrustmaster 1.6000M, TrackIr 5

Posted

SSSSSSSSTRIKEeagle!

Brrrrrrrrrrrt

I'd rather call in a Strike Eagle...

I7 6700K, MSI Z270 Gaming Pro Carbon, 32GB G.Skill Ripjaw V 3200, Inno3D GTX 1080, Samsung 970 Evo, Thrustmaster 1.6000M, TrackIr 5

Posted
F-15C and F-15E will be in service until 2040.

New weapons such as AIM-120D and its replacement, AIM-9X-Block2. New mission and weapon for anti-satellite work. Tactical airborne laser.

 

You forgot the hyperdrive :P

 

 

Modules: [A-10C] [AJS 37] [AV8B N/A] [F-5E] [F-14] [F-15E] [F-16] [F/A-18C] [FC3] [Ka-50] [M-2000C] [Mig-21 bis]

[Afghanistan] [Cold War: Germany] [Iraq] [Kola] [NTTR] [PG] [SC]

Intel i9-14900KF, Nvidia GTX 4080, Gigabyte Z790 Aorus Master X 64GB DDR5 @ 6400 MHz, SteelSeries Apex Pro, Asus ROG Gladius 3, VKB Gunfighter 3 w/ F-14 grip, VKB STECS throttle, Thrustmaster MFD Cougars x2, MFG Crosswind, DSD Flight Series button controller, XK-24,

Meta Quest 3

Posted
because the AN/APG-68 radar is still classified.

 

On one hand...I agree with this statement...no matter how cool it would be to have the late latest and greatest tech available to the military available in game...we don't want to give away secrets...

 

Now that being said...

 

I think there are a lot of things people default to "It's Classified" that while truly and honestly classified in the real world...can be simulated in the game quit nicely with giving away a single secret.

 

For example..DCS Simple Radio simulates the KY-58 secure voice system. It simulate the chirps and static and basic operation quite nicely in my opinion having used the real thing during my career...How they are simulating this is as magical to me as the real one...but there is nothing classified about it. They are using unclasssified code to simulate what the real KY-58 does. Nothing more.

 

The same can be done with the radar. We already simulate radar. Our computers aren't creating radio waves in the GHz range and bouncing them around inside the screen looking for targets. It's simulated. There are capabilities associated with the radar that can be simulated just as easily.

 

For example, the fact the F-15 C has NCTR is not a secret. How it " works" in real life is probably classified as hell...but the fact it exists isn't a secret. We can simulate NCTR using code that has nothing to do with how the real system works in the real plane. No security issue.

 

I think the key is what is available open source to work from.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Primary Computer

ASUS Z390-P, i7-9700K CPU @ 5.0Ghz, 32GB Patriot Viper Steel DDR4 @ 3200Mhz, ZOTAC GeForce 1070 Ti AMP Extreme, Samsung 970 EVO M.2 NVMe drives (1Tb & 500 Gb), Windows 10 Professional, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS, Thrustmaster Warthog Stick, Thrustmaster Cougar Throttle, Cougar MFDs x3, Saitek Combat Rudder Pedals and TrackIR 5.

 

-={TAC}=-DCS Server

Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3, i7-3770K CPU @ 3.90GHz, 32GB G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 @ 1600Mhz, ZOTAC GeForce® GTX 970.

Posted

Very curious to see how RAZBAM simulates the APG-70. Also still wondering if it will be based on the early MudHen with the F-15C engines or the later with the upgraded F100-PW-229 engines.

F/A-18C; A-10C; F-14B; Mirage 2000C; A-4E; F-16C; Flaming Cliffs 3

Posted
Now this is disappointing. With all the animations made, to me that says they hit some sort of road block to finish it. Me thinks there is a greater power stopping ED. That’s like stopping halfway to paint a masterpiece.

 

I don’t know if anyone is necessarily stopping them. ED seems to have a good enough relationship with Boeing already.

Warning: Speculation Ensues!!

My guess is the roadblock they hit (if they were even attempting to upgrade it in the first place) was the rudimentary state of the radar and the amount of investment at the time that it would require to bring it up to ED’s full module standard.

Radar and its integration with other systems has been, continues to be, and will be for the foreseeable future, a massive aspect of F-18 development. They’ve also repeatedly said that it’s one of the very foundational techs for future modules. Presumably the advancements ED’s made with the F-18 are what’s allowing them to be so optimistic about a 2019 F-16 release (color me skeptical though).

But if they have, or have ever had, plans for an Eagle upgrade, I think the chances for it increase significantly once ED is comfortable with the state of their current radar development.

/speculation

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...