Silver_Dragon Posted January 16 Posted January 16 1 minute ago, PawlaczGMD said: Imagine how much dev time this project will take away from much needed core improvements such as AI, dynamic campaign, VR performance, etc. Module building has nothing to do with core improvements, IA, VR, DC, etc.... has diferent teams. 3 For Work/Gaming: 28" Philips 246E Monitor - Ryzen 7 1800X - 32 GB DDR4 - nVidia RTX1080 - SSD 860 EVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 2 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Warthog / TPR / MDF
Bremspropeller Posted January 16 Posted January 16 The 35 we wanted null 29 2 So ein Feuerball, JUNGE!
Smashy Posted January 16 Posted January 16 45 minutes ago, Oban said: Don't buy it then... others will. Definitely a "wait and see" situation, at least for me. Who knows, Fat Amy might be a ton of fun but so many act like ED kicked their dog and keyed their car by announcing a module that no one has even seen yet. I guess some people aren't happy unless they're complaining about something. 6
TotenDead Posted January 16 Posted January 16 (edited) Thank you ED, but Спойлер null Edited January 16 by TotenDead 2
Akula Siron Posted January 16 Posted January 16 Where I can fly a sensor fusion blasted beast like the F35 if not in DCS? VTOL VR? That's nice, but I have a simpit. I like the haptics. And I want to fly with my friends with their DCS Modules. Even if it's not exactly like the real one. Now im watching all the other planes where other stuff also isn't really simulated? EW? Correct IFF ?(The JF17, yeah), Data Cardridges?, PreConfigured Profiles in my F16? RCS Simulation? DCS Is not that accurate many here stating it is. You can play it real, for sure. But you not have to. If this thing is bringing some cash for ED, it's welcome. And for all that 3-4th Gen "That's how a plane have to look like" - Dudes, im pretty sure it can get locked out from the Cold War Servers. But I missed my Strike Eagle in the Video. Don't like the idea of losing it. 6
Citizen Posted January 16 Posted January 16 2 minutes ago, Akula Siron said: Where I can fly a sensor fusion blasted beast like the F35 if not in DCS? VTOL VR? That's nice, but I have a simpit. I like the haptics. And I want to fly with my friends with their DCS Modules. Even if it's not exactly like the real one. Now im watching all the other planes where other stuff also isn't really simulated? EW? Correct IFF ?(The JF17, yeah), Data Cardridges?, PreConfigured Profiles in my F16? RCS Simulation? DCS Is not that accurate many here stating it is. You can play it real, for sure. But you not have to. If this thing is bringing some cash for ED, it's welcome. And for all that 3-4th Gen "That's how a plane have to look like" - Dudes, im pretty sure it can get locked out from the Cold War Servers. But I missed my Strike Eagle in the Video. Don't like the idea of losing it. If DCS isn't that accurate, then the documentation requirement of items like towed decoys is moot. Yet we've been told for years that those early access features were held up by the need to be super accurate. It seems like that's not the case and the element that determines which is at play is if ED wants to do the work or not. 16
Wizard_03 Posted January 16 Posted January 16 Thanks ED really looking forward to this one! 4 DCS F/A-18C :sorcerer:
Schmidtfire Posted January 16 Posted January 16 (edited) Also ED is running out of "commercially viable" aircrafts to model. F-15C and F-35A (possibly B & C) will keep this sim going. So will a Super Hornet if ED decides to go that route. As much as I love the Cold War jets, only a few of them has appeal enough for the mass market. I expect ED to make tons of sales on DLC's like airbases, highres areas etc. when the "world map" arrives. But until then, they need to keep the train rolling. Loosening up a bit on needed documentation is inevitable at some point. Edited January 16 by Schmidtfire 6
Cunctator Posted January 16 Posted January 16 This. It's a bold move, but I needed one. Just with remastered modules and increasingly obscure aircraft modules DCS can't stay afloat. 2
felixx75 Posted January 16 Posted January 16 (edited) Modern fighters like an F-35 are designed to take as much as possible off the pilot's shoulders to reduce his workload. In terms of flying, this borders on boredom. Older models are far more interesting for me. I don't just have to fly into the vicinity and drop a JDAM or similar, I have to do something for success. Since the Eurofighter is already too modern for me, I probably won't buy the F-35. Edited January 16 by felixx75 9
Sandman1330 Posted January 16 Posted January 16 10 minutes ago, Schmidtfire said: Also ED is running out of "commercially viable" aircrafts to model. F-15C and F-35A (possibly B & C) will keep this sim going. So will a Super Hornet if ED decides to go that route. As much as I love the Cold War jets, only a few of them has appeal enough for the mass market. I expect ED to make tons of sales on DLC's like airbases, highres areas etc. when the "world map" arrives. But until then, they need to keep the train rolling. Loosening up a bit on needed documentation is inevitable at some point. Sadly you are probably correct. I suspect the hardcore crowd isn't enough to remain economically viable, and this probably wasn't they way the wanted to go, but had little choice to remain competitive against other games. 4 Ryzen 7 5800X3D / Asus Crosshair VI Hero X370 / Corsair H110i / Sapphire Nitro+ 6800XT / 32Gb G.Skill TridentZ 3200 / Samsung 980 Pro M.2 / Virpil Warbrd base + VFX and TM grips / Virpil CM3 Throttle / Saitek Pro Combat pedals / Reverb G2
F-2 Posted January 16 Posted January 16 1 hour ago, lonewwolf said: I'm shocked, speechless... @Wags answered someone who asked for a possible FF F/A-18E/F Superhornet, he simply said "not possible not enough data"... and yet we'll get FF F-35A ? and possibly later, the B and C variants as well, an aircraft witch is still in active duty as the superhornet... so one could say "diimmed classified" ! Really, I would expect anything but a FF F-35A... Amazing ED, simply amazing! Do you have this? I’m trying to figure out what’s the future of DCS right now. 1 1
Akula Siron Posted January 16 Posted January 16 I also fly the tomcat, the F86 and the phantom. Never mind Mi24, Mig21 and other stuff. Our little group is munching through all the interesting airplanes and we try different missions with different tactics. But why not the F35? I don't see any advantage by letting this thing out of the sim. 1
bfr Posted January 16 Posted January 16 13 minutes ago, Schmidtfire said: Also ED is running out of "commercially viable" aircrafts to model. F-15C and F-35A (possibly B & C) will keep this sim going. So will a Super Hornet if ED decides to go that route. As much as I love the Cold War jets, only a few of them has appeal enough for the mass market. I expect ED to make tons of sales on DLC's like airbases, highres areas etc. when the "world map" arrives. But until then, they need to keep the train rolling. Loosening up a bit on needed documentation is inevitable at some point. They could've gone a slightly different way and thrown something up like a B-1B (which I think would fit the game quite well with the ability to make really bad days for people balanced with its vulnerability). My main issue with the F-35 is just feels horribly out of place/time with the other jets either in the game or in the works. If the brief appearance of the F-117 in the video is indicative of something someone is actually working on then that would actually feel much more at home with what we have/will hopefully soon have. 5
Rudel_chw Posted January 16 Posted January 16 56 minutes ago, Arecibo said: The F-35 cockpit has all the visual appeal of a truckstop ATM. agree, I'm more attracted by the F-104 paired with the Germany Map 10 For work: iMac mid-2010 of 27" - Core i7 870 - 6 GB DDR3 1333 MHz - ATI HD5670 - SSD 256 GB - HDD 2 TB - macOS High Sierra For Gaming: 34" Monitor - Ryzen 3600 - 32 GB DDR4 2400 - nVidia RTX2080 - SSD 1.25 TB - HDD 10 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Cougar Mobile: iPad Pro 12.9" of 256 GB
ESA_maligno Posted January 16 Posted January 16 hace 1 hora, PFT_Orph3us dijo: Maybe the famous Mig-31 but from the movie FIREFOX. What would You say? ...and second more thing, very soon in DCS "There are many videos of how it flies and its systems...; you can talk to one of the pilots who lives in the US to describe them..." Jijijiji 3
bies Posted January 16 Posted January 16 (edited) 9 hours ago, Phantom12 said: This should tell you something about the standard of guesswork that has been used in other modules thus far..... Not really - current modules like Hornet, Viper, Apache etc. are in big part declassified, with manuals in public, hundreds of real life pilots verifying many things. They were too moden, but acceptably realistic. Edited January 17 by bies 2
ThePLAYGUE Posted January 16 Posted January 16 Honestly, for the time and resources ED would put into an F-35 (which would be at most a hypothetically full fidelity module given the highly classified nature of the aircraft for the coming decades), I feel they would better put their effort into a Gripen C or other aircraft which they can simulate with proper resources and not essentially something along the lines of brochures.... 1
MAXsenna Posted January 16 Posted January 16 "There are many videos of how it flies and its systems...; you can talk to one of the pilots who lives in the US to describe them..." JijijijiClint knows... Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk
ED Team NineLine Posted January 16 ED Team Posted January 16 2 hours ago, lonewwolf said: I'm shocked, speechless... @Wags answered someone who asked for a possible FF F/A-18E/F Superhornet, he simply said "not possible not enough data"... and yet we'll get FF F-35A ? and possibly later, the B and C variants as well, an aircraft witch is still in active duty as the superhornet... so one could say "diimmed classified" ! Really, I would expect anything but a FF F-35A... Amazing ED, simply amazing! No, that is not true. a Superhornet, these days, is very possible. Data on them is not an issue. Thanks. 15 Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug**
Canada_Moose Posted January 16 Posted January 16 How do we know ED haven’t been asked to get involved with creating a procedural sim like they did with the A-10? They have contacts at Lockheed Martin I think? They may have more access to information than they are allowed to divulge at the present time. 3
ED Team NineLine Posted January 16 ED Team Posted January 16 29 minutes ago, ThePLAYGUE said: Honestly, for the time and resources ED would put into an F-35 (which would be at most a hypothetically full fidelity module given the highly classified nature of the aircraft for the coming decades), I feel they would better put their effort into a Gripen C or other aircraft which they can simulate with proper resources and not essentially something along the lines of brochures.... You are assuming there is enough info on the Gripen, have you done research on either? 3 1 Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug**
mxgunshot Posted January 16 Posted January 16 there is no way you can get a full fidelity full disclosure document as a civilian for F35 unless you are ready for go to jail. so like it or not. this is the best we can get . 1
Thump Posted January 16 Posted January 16 1 minute ago, mxgunshot said: there is no way you can get a full fidelity full disclosure document as a civilian for F35 unless you are ready for go to jail. so like it or not. this is the best we can get . At that point, it's no better than a random mod maker. Will be equally accurate. 3 3
Recommended Posts