ldnz Posted 10 hours ago Posted 10 hours ago In opt mode, a2g, in a dive with a good steady solution bombs appear to always fall short. In active pause, the only thing that appears to affect the indicated slant range is the altimeter setting, laser makes no difference. It appears that radar altimeter and laser aren't being used for slant range calculation, only baro alt. Unsure, but in previous mission in mountainous terrain I found a2g cannon with laser (I think, but altimeter would have been no use) to be pinpoint accurate, so possibly just not right with bombs. LastMissionTrack.trk 1
AeriaGloria Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago I have a feeling this has to do with the target altitude in DTC. I couldn’t understand the way Wags explained it exactly what this was changing, and it seemed to be for every waypoint 1 Black Shark Den Squadron Member: We are open to new recruits, click here to check us out or apply to join! https://blacksharkden.com
ED Team NineLine Posted 1 hour ago ED Team Posted 1 hour ago It's quite simple. For accurate ground attack, it helps for the aircraft to know the exact target altitude. If there is a difference in elevation of the aircraft altimeter and the target elevation, that can throw off calculations. The Target Point DTC function simply sets this elevation, just as Wags explained. 1 Forum Rules • My YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug**
ldnz Posted 1 hour ago Author Posted 1 hour ago Thanks, but which part of the calculation? Just density? Right now it appears only barometric altitude is used in the slant range calculation, not laser
Esac_mirmidon Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago And we should set barometric altitude to QFE or QNH for the Mig-29 regarding ground attack? " You must think in russian.." [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Windows 7 Home Premium-Intel 2500K OC 4.6-SSD Samsung EVO 860- MSI GTX 1080 - 16G RAM - 1920x1080 27´ Hotas Rhino X-55-MFG Crosswind Rudder Pedals -Track IR 4
AvroLanc Posted 45 minutes ago Posted 45 minutes ago 18 minutes ago, Esac_mirmidon said: And we should set barometric altitude to QFE or QNH for the Mig-29 regarding ground attack? Set QNH for ground atttck presumably, otherwise there would be no need for setting a target point elevation. This also assumes that, by design, you must ensure the target is co-located as closely as possible with your current Waypoint.
IvanK Posted 27 minutes ago Posted 27 minutes ago (edited) 1 hour ago, NineLine said: It's quite simple. For accurate ground attack, it helps for the aircraft to know the exact target altitude. If there is a difference in elevation of the aircraft altimeter and the target elevation, that can throw off calculations. The Target Point DTC function simply sets this elevation, just as Wags explained. But ....based on the limited documentation out there I believe IRL you cannot actually set a target elevation preflight into the INS/WCS. Though the DTC allows it and the DTC capability is being used to neatly simulate data entry by the ground crew on the ground , IRL there just isn't provision for any altitude entry into the system. Happy to be corrected here. I guess if there is documentation that shows that Baro ranging can be used then that would settle the issue ... just haven't seen that in the Docs I can source. Though I guess changing the QNH to a dodgy value (aka target area QFE) might work ?? Edited 12 minutes ago by IvanK
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now