Voodoo-chacal Posted June 7, 2013 Posted June 7, 2013 me too but probably Lockheed Corporation did not allow a DCS level sim (for a while) :cry: i guess these are about 5 or 6 years old images I see the f-16 as a manned missile ,pretty , beautiful , perfect ! ! !
WildBillKelsoe Posted June 7, 2013 Posted June 7, 2013 First you should pay ED to develope at least one big theater so that a fast mover makes (more) sense. :smartass: ^^ that too... AWAITING ED NEW DAMAGE MODEL IMPLEMENTATION FOR WW2 BIRDS Fat T is above, thin T is below. Long T is faster, Short T is slower. Open triangle is AWACS, closed triangle is your own sensors. Double dash is friendly, Single dash is enemy. Circle is friendly. Strobe is jammer. Strobe to dash is under 35 km. HDD is 7 times range key. Radar to 160 km, IRST to 10 km. Stay low, but never slow.
SkateZilla Posted June 7, 2013 Posted June 7, 2013 FPS Issues and EDGE :) Windows 10 Pro, Ryzen 2700X @ 4.6Ghz, 32GB DDR4-3200 GSkill (F4-3200C16D-16GTZR x2), ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate, XFX RX6800XT Merc 310 (RX-68XTALFD9) 3x ASUS VS248HP + Oculus HMD, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS + MFDs
Feuerfalke Posted June 7, 2013 Posted June 7, 2013 First you should pay ED to develope at least one big theater so that a fast mover makes (more) sense. :smartass: I'd pay for both :smartass: MSI X670E Gaming Plus | AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D | 64 GB DDR4 | AMD RX 6900 XT | LG 55" @ 4K | Cougar 1000 W | CreativeX G6 | TIR5 | CH HOTAS (with BU0836X-12 Bit) + Crosswind Pedals | Win11 64 HP | StreamDeck XL | 3x TM MFD
Silver_Dragon Posted June 7, 2013 Posted June 7, 2013 (edited) That list is 8 years old and nothing solid to go by. DGambo update the list some weeks ago. (Bold and Italic model on progress on the original post (russian forum)) Edited June 7, 2013 by Silver_Dragon For Work/Gaming: 28" Philips 246E Monitor - Ryzen 7 1800X - 32 GB DDR4 - nVidia RTX1080 - SSD 860 EVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 2 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Warthog / TPR / MDF
skouras Posted June 7, 2013 Posted June 7, 2013 If ED decide to make an F-16 it would be great a lot of people from BMS will attractive too i know a lot of guys that im flying with them online;) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]W10(64bit)Asus Rog Strix Z370-F - i7 8700K - Dark Rock Pro 4 - 16 giga ram Corsair vengeance 3000 - MSI RTX 2070 Super - Asus Rog Phobeus soundcard - Z906 Surround speaker - Track ir5 - HOTAS Warthog
Ryback Posted June 7, 2013 Posted June 7, 2013 me too but probably Lockheed Corporation did not allow a DCS level sim (for a while) :cry:..... I don't care.. If it doesn't work as DCS level let them do FC level..I would gladly pay one more FC3 cost.. So many countries can be active..I can't imagine how many virtual squadrons will pop up.. :pilotfly: It's feels good even to dream about..
SkateZilla Posted June 7, 2013 Posted June 7, 2013 If ED decide to make an F-16 it would be great a lot of people from BMS will attractive too i know a lot of guys that im flying with them online;) I doubt anyone from BMS will leave BMS For DCS, they might give DCS F16 a shot, but they'll quickly go back to BMS for the Theater and Campaign and online Campaigns. Windows 10 Pro, Ryzen 2700X @ 4.6Ghz, 32GB DDR4-3200 GSkill (F4-3200C16D-16GTZR x2), ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate, XFX RX6800XT Merc 310 (RX-68XTALFD9) 3x ASUS VS248HP + Oculus HMD, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS + MFDs
Nealius Posted June 7, 2013 Posted June 7, 2013 I would definitely play around with a DCS F-16, but for serious flying in multiple campaigns, theaters, and online play I will stick with BMS.
Voodoo-chacal Posted June 7, 2013 Posted June 7, 2013 (edited) I would definitely play around with a DCS F-16, but for serious flying in multiple campaigns, theaters, and online play I will stick with BMS. simulator for me has to have a high quality graphic , the graphic quality of the dcs aircraft is 10 times better than the BMS BMS can not achieve this level of quality DCS is crawling like a baby in a matter of quality of the theaters, but I believe it will still improve first I want to have my favorite modules F-16 and apache AH-64D , theaters may be for background Edited June 7, 2013 by Voodoo-chacal
Nealius Posted June 7, 2013 Posted June 7, 2013 I'm not ADHD enough to care THAT much about graphics. I mean, I do care about graphics to a point, but the level of graphics in BMS vs. the level of graphics in DCS isn't really that important to me. If DCS did do an F-16 module I wonder what Block it would be. One of the things I wish BMS had was specific modeling of individual blocks instead of just having the Block 50 cockpit in everything from Block 15 through 52+.
skouras Posted June 7, 2013 Posted June 7, 2013 I doubt anyone from BMS will leave BMS For DCS, they might give DCS F16 a shot, but they'll quickly go back to BMS for the Theater and Campaign and online Campaigns. the dynamic campaign for DCS will come sooner or later;) 1 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]W10(64bit)Asus Rog Strix Z370-F - i7 8700K - Dark Rock Pro 4 - 16 giga ram Corsair vengeance 3000 - MSI RTX 2070 Super - Asus Rog Phobeus soundcard - Z906 Surround speaker - Track ir5 - HOTAS Warthog
Voodoo-chacal Posted June 7, 2013 Posted June 7, 2013 the dynamic campaign for DCS will come sooner or later;) you're absolutely right : Thumbup: the DCS is alive in constant update. BMS is dead ready to be buried by DCS
theOden Posted June 7, 2013 Posted June 7, 2013 .. BMS is dead ready to be buried by DCS Are you really really sure? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Voodoo-chacal Posted June 7, 2013 Posted June 7, 2013 (edited) Are you really really sure? yes. they had plenty of time to try to improve their work, their time is over fast rise or fall slowly BMS is dead Edited June 7, 2013 by Voodoo-chacal
sorcer3r Posted June 7, 2013 Posted June 7, 2013 maybe you should inform the bms community about this. :megalol: [sIGPIC]http://i1293.photobucket.com/albums/b582/sorcerer17/sorcf16-b_zpsycmnwuay.gif[/sIGPIC]
SUBS17 Posted June 7, 2013 Posted June 7, 2013 you're absolutely right : Thumbup: the DCS is alive in constant update. BMS is dead ready to be buried by DCS No they are still improving BMS the latest patch was just a few weeks ago.:music_whistling: [sIGPIC] [/sIGPIC]
SUBS17 Posted June 7, 2013 Posted June 7, 2013 I'm not ADHD enough to care THAT much about graphics. I mean, I do care about graphics to a point, but the level of graphics in BMS vs. the level of graphics in DCS isn't really that important to me. If DCS did do an F-16 module I wonder what Block it would be. One of the things I wish BMS had was specific modeling of individual blocks instead of just having the Block 50 cockpit in everything from Block 15 through 52+. It was mentioned in an interview F-16C block 52 if ED were to do an F-16. As for theatres we have to wait for EDGE and the SDK before people can make theatres for DCS World. ED has plans on doing a DC so eventually we'll see one hopefully. Although the F-16 is not on the list maybe after the DCS Hornet someone will make one. I think eventually we'll see DCS World with a Korean theatre like Falcon 4 and most likely see a DC exactly like whats in Falcon 4 because there is a lot of information about the Korean theatre including SRTM and Google Earth so an exact copy of Falcon4s theatre may one day happen.:thumbup: [sIGPIC] [/sIGPIC]
Voodoo-chacal Posted June 7, 2013 Posted June 7, 2013 (edited) No they are still improving BMS the latest patch was just a few weeks ago.:music_whistling: is still far from being good will have to improve a lot simulator with graphics quality as atari fast rise or fall slowly they are slowly falling are close to be buried Edited June 7, 2013 by Voodoo-chacal
Nealius Posted June 7, 2013 Posted June 7, 2013 is still far from being good will have to improve a lot simulator with graphics quality as atari fast rise or fall slowly they are slowly falling are close to be buried Clueless doesn't even begin to describe....
Darkwolf Posted June 7, 2013 Posted June 7, 2013 BMS/DCS flame war inbound..... :( Both games have good point and bad point. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] PC simulator news site. Also....Join the largest DCS community on Facebook :pilotfly:
Nealius Posted June 8, 2013 Posted June 8, 2013 Hopefully not. I like both DCS (when I can play it) and BMS, but when someone spouts off bullshit about either one....
Pyroflash Posted June 8, 2013 Posted June 8, 2013 People can play whatever they want IMO. I just want a DCS Eagle. If you aim for the sky, you will never hit the ground.
SUBS17 Posted June 9, 2013 Posted June 9, 2013 Clueless doesn't even begin to describe.... I agree funny how people can judge BMS like that yet those guys have improved Falcon 4 way beyond the original sim. The F-16 FM is the best ever made for F-16 sim.:thumbup: [sIGPIC] [/sIGPIC]
Snoopy Posted June 9, 2013 Posted June 9, 2013 People can play whatever they want IMO. I just want a DCS Strike Eagle. I fixed it for you ;) :D v303d Fighter Group Discord | Virtual 303d Fighter Group Website
Recommended Posts